#1
Posted 13 August 2010 - 09:30 AM
[ Display Name History ]
But one day I started to wonder, if the 10% boost is really worth for all that range attack bonus you get from dragonhide or Karils.
At the moment I'm just guessing Void is better for low and mid level monsters, but not for high level monsters (Black dragons for example) or am I wrong and the 10% boost makes all the difference?
Do you have any ideas or better yet is there a theory of some sort out there.
#2
Posted 13 August 2010 - 09:33 AM
[ Display Name History ]
Low-mid defense = void.
It depends on how high you can get your accuracy bonus in void, though. Extreme range pots and eagle eye (Soon to be the ranged piety) tip the scales a bit.
#3
Posted 13 August 2010 - 11:37 AM
[ Display Name History ]
#4
Posted 13 August 2010 - 12:32 PM
[ Display Name History ]
For example with ranged Void: When calculating your hit accuracy, your equipment attack bonus will be added with your ranged level accuracy, and then BOTH of those will be multiplied by 10%. So in actuality the Void set not only uses 10% of your armor bonus for your ranged accuracy bonus, but 10% of your ranged level as well.
The same thing goes with your max hit. Your range level + ranged strength bonus is added to provide a hit. That hit is then multiplied by 10% giving you a 10% bonus of your ranged strength and ranged level combined.
This is why Void is often seen as better than d'hide for the reason the 10% accuracy applies to both level and equipment bonuses. It is difficult to say Void is better than Armadyl because Void takes 10% of the ranged level for accuracy while Armadyl does not. We do not know how much ranged level plays in part for accuracy compared to ranged armor bonuses. I feel as if they are very close to the same accuracy, so I would use Armadyl for places you need defense and Void at places you don't.
On a personal note, on slayer task Armadyl & black d'hide will outperform void 100%, since you get 15% att/str (slayer helm) + the amazing accuracy bonuses of the ranged armor.
#5
Posted 13 August 2010 - 07:21 PM
[ Display Name History ]
On another note, void melee has been proven to have higher DPS than full bandos. Just a little fact there.

By popular demand, this signature is back- however I currently do not have a blog up at the moment and if I did I wouldn't update it. Sorry, the sig links to nowhere :( .
#6
Posted 13 August 2010 - 07:27 PM
[ Display Name History ]
mario_sunny, on 13 August 2010 - 07:21 PM, said:
On another note, void melee has been proven to have higher DPS than full bandos. Just a little fact there.
DK drops (solo/LS): 49 hatchets, 10 archer rings, 11 berserker rings, 12 warrior rings, 11 seerculls, 9 mud staves, 2 seers rings
QBD drops: 1 kite, 1 visage, 4 dragonbone kits, 3 effigies, lots of crossbow parts
Obtaurian, on 21 October 2010 - 06:31 AM, said:
...
It's not called a Compensation Longsword for nothing.
Quyneax, on 02 March 2013 - 01:40 AM, said:
#7
Posted 13 August 2010 - 07:29 PM
[ Display Name History ]
Aeil, on 13 August 2010 - 07:27 PM, said:
mario_sunny, on 13 August 2010 - 07:21 PM, said:
On another note, void melee has been proven to have higher DPS than full bandos. Just a little fact there.
I trained my range at iron dragons.

By popular demand, this signature is back- however I currently do not have a blog up at the moment and if I did I wouldn't update it. Sorry, the sig links to nowhere :( .
#8
Posted 13 August 2010 - 07:31 PM
[ Display Name History ]
mario_sunny, on 13 August 2010 - 07:29 PM, said:
Aeil, on 13 August 2010 - 07:27 PM, said:
mario_sunny, on 13 August 2010 - 07:21 PM, said:
On another note, void melee has been proven to have higher DPS than full bandos. Just a little fact there.
I trained my range at iron dragons.
DK drops (solo/LS): 49 hatchets, 10 archer rings, 11 berserker rings, 12 warrior rings, 11 seerculls, 9 mud staves, 2 seers rings
QBD drops: 1 kite, 1 visage, 4 dragonbone kits, 3 effigies, lots of crossbow parts
Obtaurian, on 21 October 2010 - 06:31 AM, said:
...
It's not called a Compensation Longsword for nothing.
Quyneax, on 02 March 2013 - 01:40 AM, said:
#9
Posted 13 August 2010 - 09:19 PM
[ Display Name History ]
#10
Posted 14 August 2010 - 03:29 PM
[ Display Name History ]
CruelArctic, on 13 August 2010 - 09:19 PM, said:
#11
Posted 14 August 2010 - 04:39 PM
[ Display Name History ]
#12
Posted 15 August 2010 - 05:31 AM
[ Display Name History ]
#13
Posted 15 August 2010 - 05:44 AM
[ Display Name History ]
#14
Posted 15 August 2010 - 06:13 AM
[ Display Name History ]

Fisher/Woodcut------Me-----Miner/crafter----Stabber----Leecher
^Golvellius must be so proud^

#15
Posted 15 August 2010 - 01:08 PM
[ Display Name History ]
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Sign In
Create Account

Back to top

















