NoMoreDead
-
Posts
715 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by NoMoreDead
-
-
Updatizzled
-
Off topic: Nomoredead, your sig is from Mitch Hedberg right?
On Topic: BAN. Just because you're high level doesn't mean that you dont get the same treatment as a level 3 :twisted:
Yes, indeed it is.
-
Ban, the person could have autoed to lvl 126 from lvl 3 lol.
The posed question assumes that the 126 didnt auto the combat lvl up.
-
ill be there, not for the party, but to congratulate you.
..ok, maybe for the party too :D
-
-
-
-
i really doubt jagex would let this happen in the first place, this is hypothetical right?
yes, this is a purely hypothetical question derived from an event I thought was happening.
-
126's dont auto......Yes, do not ban. We know that Jagex probably makes many mistakes when banning. You always here the occasional tifer saying "my account was unfairly banned". Whether it was unfair or not doesn't matter. It's the fact that it can go either way. You have to think "WHY would a 126 jeopardize his account"? There's a larger chance you're wrong with a 126 than a level 3. Hell, jagex can't even catch the obvious ones why would they focus on a 126? It's better to give a second chance to them and automatically ban the level 3s that you know are autoing.
This is a hypothetical situation in which the level 126 IS, in fact, autoing. We know the chances of a level 126 are far less than the chances of a level 3 autoing, but that is not the issue to be debated.
thank you...: )
-
The top five list, at least in my opinion:
Least Admirable
5. Attack
4. Strength
3. Hitpoints
2. Cooking
1. Fletching
Most Admirable
5. Slayer
4. Crafting
3. Farming
2. Herblore
1. Mining
Although I am a bit biased, Since I love mining and know how hard it is to stick to it. :P
-
ban: 22
dont ban: 1
ban, unless it's chuck norris: 1
-
more bank space is a-o-k with me. I'd say another 2-3 rows would suit everyone just fine. =D> You've got my support!
-
i say most definatly yes. 8-). I mean, its just as admirable, if not more in some cases. I think there should even be a way for you to show that it's f2p. It would be rad!
-
yay! our first DONT BAN vote! Now its an official debate.
-
ban: 22
Dont ban: 0
-
Anyone want to try to make a "dont ban" argument?
-
lol thanks! someone bump me into the correct forum please. Thanks much in advance! :thumbsup:
-
oh and to a mod...could someone bump this into a autoers-macroers page please?? Sorry about that :oops:
-
Recently, I saw a couple of lvl 126's whom I suspected of auto-fishing. I did not report them, since many 126's refuse to talk or do anything but focus on what they are doing, and I have no problem with that.
But, here is my posed question to everyone...If a combat level 126 is autoing, should they be banned instantly, or given a second chance?
My stance: Although the player has prooven him/her self as a good and fair player of the game (assuming he didn't auto kill anything), the penalties should be stiff. I vote that the player should be banned.
Do they diserve a second chance? Does the mass amounts of legit time
they spent outweigh the hours they didn't? You decide.
I'd be interested to see if anybody will take the "Dont ban" side. It would make for a fun debate \
Votes:
Ban: 61
Don't Ban: 6
Ban, Unless its Chuck Norris: 7
-
examine big bones---"Ew, its a pile of bones"
examine spinach roll- "A homemade spinach thing"
To ban or not to ban: A lvl 126---1,500+ views
in General Discussion
Posted
updated.