Jump to content

BlueLancer

Members
  • Content Count

    3972
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by BlueLancer


  1. I mean, I'm not really going to debate this, but instead I'll just state it. I don't really believe Wikileaks should exist.

     

    Its endangering soldiers and other innocent peoples lives right?

     

     

    And this, is why I'm not debating it.

    But it's not.

     

    The Government comes out with the same BS every time about it risking lives and it's absolute crap. Of ALL the times Wikileaks have released 'life-risking' documents, how many people have died from it? None. They're not bloody advertising troop movements and pointing a big neon sign saying 'HERE'S A WEAK SPOT GO KILL THEM'. It's exposing the hypocrisies and corruption of their regime. This doesn't equate to 'blood on Julian Assange's hands'.

     

     

    I'd like to quote the CBS article above. (And I have that set of documents on my computer)

     

    One specific example cited by the paper is a report on an interview conducted by military officers of a potential Taliban defector. The militant is named, along with his father and the village in which they live.

     

    They probably wont be alive for very long.

     

    General information and diplomatic cables should be leaked, but names and locations should be censored.

     

    People will as a direct consequence of leaking some of the secret documents, be (or already are) murdered, tortured or kidnapped if they contain identifiable people and civilian names. Assange has blood on his hands.

     

    What he is doing is a favor to transparency and democracy. But he has no business exposing individual people who were collaborating with foreign forces to catch other insurgents, criminals, terrorists etc.

    Comparable to leaking out press sources. Without anonymous press sources you could never interview anyone in undemocratic countries.

     

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reporter's_privilege

    Reporters' privilege is the qualified (limited) First Amendment right many jurisdictions by statutory law or judicial decision have given to journalists in protecting their confidential sources from discovery.

     

    The only reason protection of sources exists (in the case of individuals) is to guarantee their untouchability and physical safety.

    If they gave out sensitive enough information & you take anonymity away from them you are signing their death warrant


  2. Musicians, software engineers and game developers get their living with future commissions and royalties.

     

    Depriving them entirely of income is suicidal if considering future productions.

    These people have to either earn money from their work in the long term or face unemployment. Inspiration alone is not going to pay for their massive development costs, studio time, tools, physical equipment, office rent etc.

    http://economics.uchicago.edu/download/musicindustryoct12.pdf

    For the group of users of peer-to peer systems, piracy reduces the probability of buying music by 35% to 65%.

    Is piracy something you need to demonize? No. Perhaps it sends a good message to these companies that product prices should be more reasonable to make them affordable to a wider base of consumers (including poor students). Piracy is a symptom and a reaction to high prices or bad availability (and semi-malware such as DRM and rootkits)

     

    However, refusing to absolutely pay *anything* for work other people have put forward is a form of theft. In the case of software, for example, the copyright holder/licensee is selling a digital copy of a program for a determined price per consumer that the company has deemed appropriate for recouping development losses.

     

    The product being a digital good instead of a tangible, touchable physical object doesn't make it's illegal usage any less financially damaging to developers. By entirely refusing to purchase the artist's product, you would not be hurting the 'greedy record companies or publishers', but the artist who directly depends on people buying the products to earn a living.

     

    No, one download does not equal one sale, ever. There are people who wouldn't pay for a product either way even if no pirated equivalent was available. But it always equals some form of loss to the developer. Should all consumers simply choose the pirated option instead of the commercial copy, the company would not attract investors for a second game/software/etc. (which is happening to PC games due to abnormally high piracy rates)

    http://www.shacknews.com/onearticle.x/53357

    Crytek Estimates 20 PC Game Pirates for Every One Legitimate Buyer

    Echoing previous reports that Crysis Warhead would be Crytek's last PC-exclusive title, Yerli added that rampant piracy may lead to "less and less games appearing on the PC, or less and less games pushing the boundaries of PC gaming."

     

    "For one sale there are 15 to 20 pirates and pirate versions, and that's a big shame for the PC industry."

    "Our message is if you're a PC gamer, and you really want to respect the platform, then you should stop pirating."

    I don't believe it's fair to say all the developers are just lying or shifting blame.

    They are really abandoning the PC as a gaming platform because the games simply don't sell over the pirated equivalent.

     

    Console platforms which are hard or impossible to pirate on such as PS3 and the 360 sell the same games at exponentially higher rates compared to the PC even though they cost the same (or more).


  3. I believe in voluntarism.. which is basically anarcho-capialism.

    What have I said that makes me sound like I think stealing isn't wrong? The first thing I stated was that stealing is wrong..

    Only I can say what is for my own good. And only you can say what is good for you.. "Public" services are just monopolies.

     

     

    Capitalist enterprises and property-driven societies, even quasi-anarchic ones like Russia, need protection and facilities by default. They can't only rely on private security companies for security, or on community collections for enormous projects such as sewage maintenance, building of oil pipes, heating routes, electric grids, etc.. The only way to finance these facilities is through taxing every participating and non-participating member of that society for a set amount of money regularly.

     

    Though, there are many ways to go about with it. The current model used in Europe and the US guarantees a certain minimum level of services even for non-contributing citizens on grounds of humanity, but it's not particularly 'effective' and it significantly drains economical resources from people aspiring to rise out of the lower or middle social classes by labour. For example, in tax havens such as Panama, the vast majority of tax revenue comes from VAT and import tariffs, which do not have much direct impact on a consumer at all.

     

    Salaries are taxed at 0%, companies pay some tax, but there are numerous loopholes in the legislation that effectively allow 0% taxation for corporations as well (especially if split in multiple shell entities). In return, the government only maintains the basic functions of society, such as waste management, military defence, rudimentary public schooling and some transportation duties. Advanced features such as social security or healthcare are not available, so if you fall poor or jobless suddenly, you are in big trouble (screwed) in a country of low taxation. Especially if you have loans or try to upkeep your previous lifestyle.

     

    If it were not for the relatively heavy taxes levied on everything you do in society, you probably would not have your current standard of living, assuming you are middle class in a western country.


  4. Where was America when Hurricane Katrini hit? Seriously though, what sort of contribution do you think Haiti could have possibly made to the Katrina relief effort?

    We have been porting money into Haiti for years and where has it gone?

     

    France and the US ultimately made Haiti into what it is today (or was, before the earthquake - a poor, crime infested drug harbor) during colonial times.

     

    Think of it like the guilt-responsibility relationship between Germany and Israel. It is bad PR for the US if they didn't keep helping them after using the land for enormous coffee, spice, cotton, manual slave labor etc. profits, and leaving the local population all alone with a corrupt hierarchy after they had collected worthwhile profits & deemed the exploitation to be no longer politically viable due to the negative response in their respective countries.

     

    You are not responsible for what happened in the past, just as today's young Germans are not responsible for what happened in WW2 to jews, but the political and moral ground for continuing aid and 'reparation' money exists, and has been paid to Haiti ever since they gained independence. As a result of the earthquake it will probably continue almost indefinitely.


  5. I never bought expensive headphones yet one of them pairs worked for over 4 years. Your statement of "money equals quality" is invalid.

     

    Don't see how it can be invalid only based on a single personal experience, statistically more expensive headphones (especially coiled cable) are percieved as much superior when comparing to cheaper ones.

     

    For example Pioneer ON headphones get about 100% approval rating and 5/5 on most sites, while costing roughly $100, and lower-end headphones from Sennheiser (of which I own a couple of products) consistently get horrible 1/5 reviews from most users due to poor construct and lack of suitability for anything else than light use, while only costing a fraction of the higher end models.

     

    Of course it's possible you just ran into an exceptionally well-manufactured patch of hp's, and they will never break, or will not wear due to only light gaming use/some mp3's. But a great number of people experience difficulties especially with lower-end models. There was a thread just like this one on bit-tech last year.

     

    http://forums.bit-tech.net/showthread.php?t=151282


  6. I've now gone through 5 sets of headphones in probably the past 3 months and they all break the same way. First one of the headphones suddenly doesn't work unless I position it a certain way in the jack. So then I position it that way so I can listen to it, and then it gets harder and harder to do and finally the other one goes out and absolutely no noise comes out no matter how i position it.

     

    I put my headphones in my pocket w/out being plugged into Ipod or wrapped around it (I wrapped around for the first 2 pairs and then the other 3 I tried not doing that and they lasted a bit longer). All of headphones were good ones - Sony and they sound great at first.

     

    So is it something I'm doing to the headphones, something wrong with my Ipod or just unluckyness?

     

    any help appreciated

     

    EDIT: btw, this pair sometimes get's better for a day or two and I don't need to move cord around or anything and then it goes back, so idk if that's helpful or not. O and I also have Ipod in my pocket while I lift weights and sometimes it get's tight in my pockets, do you think that could be a reason for it?

     

    Sounds so familiar. :D

     

    Found a simple solution... Stopped buying cheap stuff like $5 sony headphones. Money equals quality in this issue. Spent $60 on some earbuds, still using them (Sennheiser) worked great for 2+ years and no degradation whatsoever, no need to mess with the wires, etc


  7. Girls do sometimes settle for nice guys who are providers, (at later ages it means they have money) but they are still hardwired to cheat on/leave them for an alpha male.

     

    Which is the problem behind many divorces in western countries. There is freedom of choice, and there are biological urges which are not controllable. Well, I wouldn't entirely blame it on women, but men as well.

     

    Just as men usually prefer a woman who is healthy and at least not very obese, women usually prefer physical men (though everybody is an individual, so you can't generalize 'men' and 'women').

     

    The issue boils down largely to the fact that men neglect themselves. This frustrates some women, just as some husbands can become dissatisfied when their ex-beautiful wife turns into a lazy slob. There are also numerous studies and proof about monogamy being unnatural[1]. Up to over a half of people in 'committed' relationships eventually cheat, even those in decades-long marriages.

     

    So if you want to stick with your woman/man for a long time, you must know how to be his/her best friend, what needs the person has, how to entertain them, etc... If some of these needs go unmet, especially the physical ones, the relationship has no ground to stand on. The man/woman will meet those needs with someone else behind your back, they don't disappear just because you're in a "relationship".

     

    And it's not just the older people who cheat. Even people 18-25 who profess eternal love to their partner often cheat 1-2 years down the road when they become 'bored' (at younger than 18 it's even worse with the 2 week romances which are nothing but lust). I've been in 1 long term relationship and some shorter ones, imo living with one person for extended periods of time (besides family members) creates tension and frustration, becoming 'bored' of the other, etc.. But, again, everyone has their preferences. For some people it works great for years.

     

    Also, having a child occassionally does wonders for relationships, though this isn't a minute issue for most tip.it'ers (albeit there are plenty of parents here too). Children truly can bind a family together and couples usually find it very meaningful to bring and raise a new life in the world, and nurture him/her.


  8. Used to have a pretty nice sports car, until I crashed it (speeding & stupidity). Posted some crash pics as a reminder to other drivers on tip.it.

     

    Would still have the money to buy a fancy car, but I realize it's b.s. Why build your ego with 'rares'? To be honest, even a $5k car is just fine. A 30k mercedes benz is more than you'll ever need. Why bother spending upwards of $100k on a sports car that guzzles gas like no tomorrow and has no real utility (and it's worth drops dramatically when you gain mileage on it compared to normal cars)

     

    Unless you have *tons* of excess money. People do spend massive cash even on 'shallow' rares like jewelry, shoes, rolex watches etc. that don't really serve any meaningful purpose. The only thing a rare is, is a status item.

     

    And believe it or not but most people don't respect unofficial status, only the other shallow ones. Normal people are indifferent or will see you as boasting


  9. It's because we look for something to make us unique when really there's nothing there.

     

    Exactly. If someone is so hellbent on categorising themselves, just ask the random opinions of 10-20 average people on the street. They will tell you your ethnicity. You would probably get very honest replies. To be honest, it's ok to be proud of your heritage. But if you are concerned about how others percieve you.. Racial (and, racist) profiling is all about how you look, not from which province your grandmother or father was from. If you look black, that's how the government profiles you. If you look white, asian or native, that. Regardless of your genetic chart.

     

    People should be proud of their life achievements, family members, etc.. Instead of trying to romanticize their roots. There is nothing inherently special, good or bad about being from any ethnic group. Ultimately it's your upbringing, attitude, decisions, environment and DNA that determine who you are as a person. The color of your skin or the structure of your face plays no role in that.


  10. Personally i would add two more sections, Indian and Arabic, as they make up a very large proportion of the world and don't immediately fit into any of the other sections.

     

    I however am a British White man.

     

    I am pretty sure Indians are Asians. :mellow:

    I guess you can say that, but India is the 2nd most populated country in the world (correct me on this if I'm wrong), so it deserves its own section.

     

    China is the most populated country in the world yet it's not a "race". (Besides the fact that China is not homogenous; There are multiple, mostly asian and tatar ethnicities in the country, and tons of different languages)

     

    Not to mention India isn't homogenous as well. It includes tamils, various people from muslim countries, south/north indians (who for a large part look completely unlike each other), pakistanis, afghans, sri lankans, etc...

     

    Ethnic profiling as done by intelligence agencies, insurance companies (yes some do it) includes only the most rudimentary races that even advanced computer programs can distinguish from a face: Caucasian, Black, Asian. Some very advanced recognition softwares can even break them down to subcategories like ethnic native american, inuit, australian aboriginal etc...

     

    Of course, the more racial mixture you have, the more difficult it becomes to just 'lump' you in a category. USA is one of (if not the only) the few countries with this 'issue', people have so diverse backgrounds not even the most sophisticated computers can say what they're supposed to 'be'.

     

    For example, people with mid-eastern complexions, but asian eyes, and white/black mixed facial features. Such a person could be found in the US but not very many other countries of the world. It would also be very hard to lump them to a racial category


  11. Unfortunately no. I would have sympathy for the person especially if I loved them (and some people don't get to choose whether they are infected or not, for example previous rape victims, been stuck with a needle by a narc, etc), but the relationship could never work.

     

    Or, if you ever decided to have kids, you would fear to death the childbirth process could transfer the disease onto an innocent baby (which happens every day in poorer countries). I couldn't bear with that.


  12. Well. I live in Florida(305, lol), so I don't know if my basis is accurate, but my view is pretty much the same as yours. Mostly everyone cusses excessively and tries to act hard. Crap like that. Thinking they're bad and saying they're in gangs. I don't really take them seriously, though.

     

    That's a good thing, just means you're safe in most cases. The people who would be a real threat to you don't advertise themselves or wear baggy jeans and hoodies. They will be likely russian, chinese or italian and they wear suits & are on average older than 'gang' kids.

     

    In some areas though, yes, there are lots of druggies and petty thieves etc.. Who would mug you for 10 bucks, and it's sad. The best thing to do is avoiding places they frequent, why play hero and risk death/HIV infections from needles etc. if they get pissed off?


  13. As a general rule anything over 10 reps is cardio, not muscle mass improvement.

     

    The entire point of trying to increase the amount of muscle is causing microtears in the muscle fiber by lifting weights that are at 80 to 100% of your maximum, for 2 to 8 repetitions at the maximum. Which in turn causes proteins to be carried to that area of the body to repair it & slightly improve the mass every single time.

     

    I would definitely not recommend 'real' weight training after a serious back surgery. Cardio is a safer option until you get absolutely better with the back, because there is a possibility you can wreck it again.


  14. 99% of accelerators are adware filled junk. Contrary to what they advertise, you simply can't download faster (without hacking the config file of the modem box) than your ISP sets the dl speed roof at, or the speed the server you get the file from.. Sets it to.

     

    The remaining, working accelerators split a file similar to BitTorrent, connecting to the file via multiple connections. One of your connections downloads part 1, one downloads part 2 etc... And then combines them at the end. Which is significantly faster than just waiting for the single file to download at the capped speed. (If the server sets cap at 200kb/s and your connection can handle 1000, it's a waste of time so people use accelerators)

     

    One of the software pieces I found was Internet download manager. Has no adware or spyware, but it's a trial


  15. Being incapable of laughing at yourself is emotional immaturity. You take the world too serious if you get offended by racist jokes.

     

    You know who I heard the best 'jew' jokes from? Jews, and their parents when I visited their homes. And not just puns, but extremely offensive & vulgar ones. At least 1 group of people who knows how to take humor. It seems non-jews take these jokes more seriously than the subject of the jokes themself.

     

    A joke on it's own is not racist. Even offensive humor can be comedy. Nobody is perfect, there are flaws within human nature, sometimes these jokes and the stereotypes can hit close to home despite being only rude jokes. A piece of comedy should be only evaluated for it's humoristic value, not for political, historical or social agendas.

     

    Even many black comedians make fun of jews/asians/arabs, many asians mock asian/black traditions/customs, yet when anybody white says any of these jokes, it's suddenly racist and offensive. It's ridiculous. Stop appealing to the past because the people alive today have nothing to do with people of the past. Nobody chose to be born a certain skin color nor can they effect it in any way. People are individual human beings, not colors.


  16. I know appeal to experience is a fallacy of sorts, but I'd definitely recommend wearing it whenever you remember to. Got into a crash only going about 30-40km/h at age 19, and it hurt like hell because my left knee hit the panel. With seatbelt = no damage at all, but I was ignorant.

     

    If you get into a crash at 60km/h+ speeds, it's almost certain you will be killed by the impact without a seatbelt. The only thing that can save you in that situation is good luck or a working airbag (older cars may not have them at all or like in my case, it did not pop out at all)


  17. Edit: Reading the wikipedia description is like reading a description about me. Amazingly accurate. Then again it makes me wonder if I'm exactly like 3.3% of the population.

     

    Personality tests are very much like horoscopes in the sense that they are written on the Barnum principle of appealing to as many people as possible within the reader base. If the respondent recognises some traits in himself, the 'tailored' result will attempt to re-inforce those thoughts.

     

    You are your own self, that 3.3% includes people all the way from prison pedophiles to millionaire businessmen and kind philantrophists.

     

    These can be useful as a reference for improving yourself & understanding your personality, but I would just treat it as entertainment. 3.3% of the population getting that result doesn't mean they have anything in common together besides possibly some rudimentary characteristics (such as overall higher percentage of introvercy)


  18. Just more freaking tuna and salad. I'm thinking of just dropping protein diets for a few days to eat those italian subs another guy posted on this page. Eating only one or two things starts getting annoying over time. Actually, now that I think of it, no normal person would care if their body fat went up by 0.05% by having a few subs every now and then.


  19. Acknowledging the ridiculous nature of 'required societal norms' and the general emptiness of life does wonders for anti-socialism. When you free yourself of shackles like self-conscious shame, you can have polite conversations with strangers, have a good time with friends, be open with loved ones, etc... Just think of life as another game. Don't be scared to speak; Ultimately most people will not laugh at you or think you are awkward, as long as you have something meaningful to say.

     

     

     

    The bad part is that only you can do it. Nobody, probably not even a psychiatrist, can just 'make' you social. It's not an inherited trait any more than other traits (roughly 50/50 between genetics & environment). You can learn to control aspects of your personality if you really want to.

     

     

     

    For me, I realized how unattractive, unprofessional and unfriendly people find it when you don't look at them or try to engage in meaningful conversation, instead just grunting simple responses and staying silent. I don't live for other people's opinions, but other people can definitely give you some perspective on what you could change in yourself.


  20. Acknowledging the ridiculous nature of 'required societal norms' and the general emptiness of life does wonders for anti-socialism. When you free yourself of shackles like self-conscious shame, you can have polite conversations with strangers, have a good time with friends, be open with loved ones, etc... Just think of life as another game. Don't be scared to speak; Ultimately most people will not laugh at you or think you are awkward, as long as you have something meaningful to say.

     

     

     

    The bad part is that only you can do it. Nobody, probably not even a psychiatrist, can just 'make' you social. It's not an inherited trait any more than other traits (roughly 50/50 between genetics & environment). You can learn to control aspects of your personality if you really want to.

     

     

     

    For me, I realized how unattractive, unprofessional and unfriendly people find it when you don't look at them or try to engage in meaningful conversation, instead just grunting simple responses and staying silent. I don't live for other people's opinions, but other people can definitely give you some perspective on what you could change in yourself.


  21. Research aside, personally I don't believe the death penalty has any preventive effect in society. It's obviously not very rehabilitating either.

     

     

     

    Life in prison without the possibility of parole, in solitary confinement & eventually dying of old age in your feces inside a cell you've been in for 40 years is worse than being injected with chemicals and dying peacefully.

     

     

     

    There are more effective punishments than death if you want revenge. If my own child was killed or molested, why would I want the offender to simply die? (if there was no way to extract vigilante justice on him) It wont bring anyone peace of mind, least of all to my kid. Western countries have something to learn from pseudo-democracies like China that have different judicial systems.

     

     

     

    If your crime is bad enough, like murdering bystanders during an armed robbery, you can be sentenced to intense forced labor camps for life. There are no parole hearings or ways to get out, as the heavily armed military police guards those camps. They are strategically placed near army barracks so there is no way to escape. You work for 12 or more hours a day in a coal or salt mine, get enough food to stay alive, and continue every day for the rest of your life.

     

     

     

    That way, the offender both creates economic resources back to the society he hurt, plus he loses all control of his life. So instead of ending up costing the state money in forms of prisoner upkeep or the death penalty, he will actually generate resources for the rest of his life & have an extreme punishment at the same time.


  22.  

     

     

    I find all sorts of humor funny, sometimes even inappropriate rude troll humor is funny as hell, but that was just lame. The author constantly makes personal attacks on the personas and lives of the artists instead of concentrating on the title, and it gets unfunny fast. Horrible list.


  23. Why would you anyone watch a movie on youtube? The quality would be ugh.

     

     

     

    Most of the HD vids on youtube have stunning picture quality, I couldn't distinguish some of them from a 1080p BluRay movie. Those were official trailers though, not user-shot content.

     

     

     

    If the streaming rate was high enough for there to be no lag, I'd probably pay $0.50 to $1 per view. Even torrent users or illegal downloaders could find it convenient, you don't have to resume downloads or rely on seeds, just write the film name, click full screen and watch it instantly.

     

     

     

    Though, if the audio quality was bad & the price was too high ($5 gets you a real cinema ticket in many countries), it probably wouldn't succeed. It's also going to place heavy bandwidth demands on YT servers, for full HD imagery and 5.1 sound, maybe 800-1000kb/s per user

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.