Jump to content

The Offical TIF American Elections thread


Necromagus

Who are you going to/would you vote for?  

359 members have voted

  1. 1. Who are you going to/would you vote for?

    • Gene Amondson (Prohibition party)
      0
    • Chuck Baldwin (Constitution party)
      3
    • Bob Barr (Libertarian party)
      5
    • Róger Calero (Socialist Workers party)
      4
    • Charles Jay (Boston Tea Party)
      7
    • Alan Keyes (America's Independent party)
      0
    • Gloria La Riva (Socialism & Liberation party)
      1
    • John McCain (Republican party)
      80
    • Frank McEnulty (New American Independent Party)
      0
    • Cynthia McKinney (Green party)
      3
    • Brian Moore (Socialist party)
      2
    • Ralph Nader (Independent, "Peace and Freedom")
      6
    • Barack Obama (Democratic party)
      247
    • Ted Weill (New independent party)
      1


Recommended Posts

What the heck is up with all these names? At most it should be Obama, McCain and maybe Nader. None of these other candidates will EVER win the presidency. History has been rather unkind to third parties, let alone these other guys/girls.

100% F2P

85 Mining achieved on Dec 4, 2007

85 Smithing achieved on May 28, 2009

anim7.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

 

Everyone says they'll vote for Barack Obama, but i doubt he'll win. I said i'd vote for Barack Obama, but really in secret, if i was a legal adult, and could vote, i'd go off and vote for McCain.... :oops:

 

... Why?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

looks like most people like obama. although im not that excited about mccain, obama seems like the kind of guy that would get elected, mess everything up, then leave. like jimmy carter.

 

Or vote for McCain. He'll continue to mess everything up from the start, and refuse to leave.

 

 

 

at least he has political experience. i wouldnt trust obama if an emergency situation arose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Obama all the way. (I've met him before too :thumbsup: )

 

 

 

[hide=the reason why, Don't click if you don't want to see my views.]Mcain's ads that say "Obama wants to raise taxes! and not drill oil off the coast!". Let's see, Obama wants to get out a war that is costing us millions of dollars, and possibly the reason for the oil problem. Then (I'm guessing) he WILL raise the taxes, but only to (possibly, maybe) help stabilize the economy. Mcain on the other hand, doesn't care if we STAY in the war, and then to make up the difference of the war causing the oil problem, create oil platforms off our coasts, because we don't have enough oil spills happening :roll:. An who knows, he will probably raise taxes too.[/hide]

Unfinished netherrack symbol of Khorne.

 

Never forget. ~creeper face w/single tear~

 

DO YOU HEAR THE VOICES TOO?!?!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like I'm with the majority here. Obama definitely deserves it, just hope he doesn't get shot. We've been in Iraq long enough, we don't need to stay longer.

7 years 'scape knowledge and counting

m8pu02.png

99 Attack - June 8th 2010 99 Defence - August 2nd 2011 99 HP - December 2nd 2011

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow...... thats quite a result.

 

 

 

 

 

Remembering though that this is a "world vote" and not an American one it does not mean all that much.....

 

 

 

I am english. but as a proud resident of planet earth I feel American politics are fairly important. I place my vote with Obama....

 

 

 

 

 

Lets face it it's either going to be McCain, or obama...... and I don't trust McCain one little bit!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I feel America and the world need difference, and that only lies with Obama, he may be a left winger, which is not something I would normally support, but he seems like a fair balanced man who will do the world proud.

sig2webzx7.jpg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Canadian but I think Obama. And by the poll results I'm not the only one.

 

 

 

For varying reasons, mainly the policies that will affect Canadians in positive ways.

 

 

 

renegotiating nafta could affect canada in negative ways.

My carbon footprint is bigger than yours...and you know what they say about big feet.

 

These are the times that try mens souls...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem with Obama is the fact that he's VERY weak on foreign policy/security. He simply doesn't have the experience to succeed. However, Mccain's stance domestically isn't great either... This is a close one, but I'll lean towards Mccain here- Nader cost Gore the election, and he should just stop trying.... And the rest of them... well... most haven't heard of...

signatureforkam42705lorpj5.jpg

i mean wth no1 cares about that weak noob that was scared of the great almighty lord ZAROS!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In my opinion, it's a lose-lose situation for Americans. There isn't a good solid person running that I can connect with. I would vote McCain because I think he has more experience. Meh...Don't like either of 'em much though.

sig2-1.png

Last.Fm

 

My Bloggy

 

Proud to have served on Tip.it Crew

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well I have no intentions of voting for either of the main candidates, will either sit out the presidential election or vote for a third party candidate I actually believe in. Chuck Baldwin looks promising. I don't care for some of his defeatist outlooks on things though, like when he said we should not be the worlds police. I think we should be taking over the world by now, should have been doing it all along. Hell if it where up to me we would have annexed much of South America (numerous opertunity's during civil unrest such as revolutions, and terribly opressive and brutal governments that should of been replaced with our own) and Mexico a long time ago (Mexico pretty much lost at least one war with us, should of done it then).

 

 

 

But that's just me, quite possibly one of the last imperialists living in the world. At any rate I sure as hell don't trust our current government to do that right; they are squandering a wonderful opportunity in Iraq to secure that oil for our nations use. So I can't hold it against any one who say's we shouldnt be the worlds police, we just don't have the right mindset (or government for that matter) to do it right. Also since I brought it up I might as well let you know I am not like one of the Imperialists of old (who exploited other peoples), I believe in granting citizenship to the annexed and partitioning their lands into territorys, and then within 30 or so years making them into states with a voice in the government.

Clan Moderator from December 15th 2006- August 20th 2007

Founder of: Terran Gamers, formerly known as Militos Deci

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who was it that posted on a topic the "Time to start a'campaignin' " video? That was hilarious.
http://www.jibjab.com/originals/time_for_some_campaignin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it not possible to split the poll into US voters and non-US (and underaged) people? Because I read that McCain has gained on Obama; in fact according to recent polls McCain woul win with a pretty significant difference compared to Obama. I'm sure that a large part of these votes are from non-Americans or underaged people, so the poll is pretty irrelevant.

 

 

 

As for me, Obama would have to drastically change his course to lose me as a supporter.

 

 

 

The problem with Obama is the fact that he's VERY weak on foreign policy/security. He simply doesn't have the experience to succeed. However, Mccain's stance domestically isn't great either...

 

I don't know if you know something about your former presidents, but charisma makes a great deal of difference, especially in foreign politics. Franklin D. Roosevelt (1933-1944 I believe) was a president that wasn't particulary good in anything, except for talking and surrounding himself with the right people. Because of him, the US flourished and recovered from the bad blow caused by the stock market plummet in the late '20s. He even ruled for 3 succesful terms, a feat only Washington ever did before him.

 

Now Obama has great charisma, that's the least you can say, and he's very popular abroad, especially in Europe, and I'm sure in many other parts of the world as well. The US badly need the opposite of G.W. Bush Jr., as he's done a tremendous amount of damage PR-wise and economically seen in all parts of the world. With Obama (black, a democrat, open-minded, a listener,...) as the opposite, much of the hatred against the USA would fade away. I don't know if he's the best person to deal with the economical crisis, but nor was Roosevelt, and yet he dealt with it, thanks to his 'brain trust', which were all of his advisors. Because Obama is known to be a listener, someone who does not act without carefully thinking everything over, I think that he may be fully capable of restoring the economical balance with a little help of well-picked advisors.

Bill Hicks[/url]":dhj2kan9]Since the one thing we can say about fundamental matter is, that it is vibrating. And since all vibrations are theoretically sound, then it is not unreasonable to suggest that the universe is music and should be perceived as such.

heinzny2.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^^ Washington only served two terms. He was the one who set the precedent for it. Roosevelt is the only President to ignore it and go for reelection again. After him they made it a law that you can't serve more than 2 terms.

My carbon footprint is bigger than yours...and you know what they say about big feet.

 

These are the times that try mens souls...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

^^ Washington only served two terms. He was the one who set the precedent for it. Roosevelt is the only President to ignore it and go for reelection again. After him they made it a law that you can't serve more than 2 terms.

 

 

 

Oh, my bad, I really thought he served 12 years.

Bill Hicks[/url]":dhj2kan9]Since the one thing we can say about fundamental matter is, that it is vibrating. And since all vibrations are theoretically sound, then it is not unreasonable to suggest that the universe is music and should be perceived as such.

heinzny2.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It made me die a little bit when Ron Paul chose to focus on his reelection in the house. He was by far my favorite candidate. Now, I'll just be voting for Obama to prevent McCain from getting into office. I agree with most of Obamas policies, it's just Ron Paul seemed more like a citizen and not a politician.

Foooman.png
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not to mention Obama's stance on healthcare- it is IMPOSSIBLE to offer every American free healthcare. Look at Britain, and tell me how it went there. The only way it can be offered in in tiers- one may pay a higher tax to get better benefits, and the funds are placed into a national pool from which insurers may withdraw from. This would lower the effect on individual consumers, but, of course, this MUST be limited to tax-payers....

signatureforkam42705lorpj5.jpg

i mean wth no1 cares about that weak noob that was scared of the great almighty lord ZAROS!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not to mention Obama's stance on healthcare- it is IMPOSSIBLE to offer every American free healthcare. Look at Britain, and tell me how it went there.

 

 

 

Actually our healthcare is fine, some people choose to go private because it's better. That doesn't mean the free healthcare is crap though.

 

Everyone gets a free GP, and it's working. So you know, research, proof and facts is generally good to back up things you say. :|

megakillersigbyhawkxsrh0.png

Quit Runescape 30th May 2006.

Thanks to Hawkxs for my signature :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not to mention Obama's stance on healthcare- it is IMPOSSIBLE to offer every American free healthcare.

 

It is entirely possible, if they did it the way Finland does it. I don't know the way Obama is wanting to do it, though.

C2b6gs7.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Half of the people in this thread obviously don't know [cabbage] about either of their policies. But, to sum up, McCain is well-experienced, particularly on security and foreign policy. I'm also fairly certain he'd choose a VP good with economics and more domestic things.

 

 

 

Obama, on the other hand, is much the opposite. He's a good people person as well. He'd have a better shot at helping out the economy without a vice president. But if Russia make an aggressor move, we'd have to hope his VP is good.

 

 

 

I figure Obama will win. Of course, it won't matter for too many years; most Democrats and Republicans are quite similar in policies and such these days.

catch it now so you can like it before it went so mainstream

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not to mention Obama's stance on healthcare- it is IMPOSSIBLE to offer every American free healthcare. Look at Britain, and tell me how it went there.

 

 

 

Actually our healthcare is fine, some people choose to go private because it's better. That doesn't mean the free healthcare is crap though.

 

Everyone gets a free GP, and it's working. So you know, research, proof and facts is generally good to back up things you say. :|

 

 

 

 

 

Yes the British health service is great! America could take on a model built on the same system for probaly under 20 bill. The main issues of the health service is 11 years of a left wing political party running it full of nannying bureaucrats who don't let doctors work so they can fill in paperwork telling said bureaucrats how hard they aren't working (because they have no time left).

 

 

 

Get a right wing party with left wing aims in power and we are sorted! (and I DON'T mean centralist..........)

sig2webzx7.jpg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It made me die a little bit when Ron Paul chose to focus on his reelection in the house. He was by far my favorite candidate. Now, I'll just be voting for Obama to prevent McCain from getting into office. I agree with most of Obamas policies, it's just Ron Paul seemed more like a citizen and not a politician.

 

 

 

Ron Paul is now focusing on his Campaign for Liberty. I voted for Chuck Baldwin of the Constitution party in the poll

 

 

 

http://www.campaignforliberty.com/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.