rakaminko Posted March 27, 2009 Share Posted March 27, 2009 Yup I know her. A friend of mine dated her back in 6th grade but broke up with her because she did many wrong things. Well she was always "edgy" but I never expected this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mylez Posted March 27, 2009 Share Posted March 27, 2009 Don't say anything else about her identity.. Keep it to yourself, thanks ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rakaminko Posted March 27, 2009 Share Posted March 27, 2009 Yeah trying to be as vague as possible. Anyways, this was quite the stupid thing to do on her behalf. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sa121 Posted March 27, 2009 Share Posted March 27, 2009 Don't say anything else about her identity.. Keep it to yourself, thanks ;) Omg, u suck i wuz gunna myspace stalk herr. Just playing. Anyways, on-topic, I think its pretty funny people are getting charged for this, it's kinda odd to be charging a 14 year old with child pornography if its herself, but I guess she'd be liable to distributing pornography to minors. R.I.P Shiva and The Old NiteVisit My Huge Goals!!! <---- Click ThisMy Pk GalleryGWD: 3x Saradomin Sword, 2x Saradomin Hilt, 2X B Boots, 1x Tasset, 2X B Plate, 2X Shard, 1X D MedTDs: 3x Solo Claws, 1x Solo Armour Piece99 Untrimmed HP, 0% Pc'd and before Soul Wars -- Trimmed July 1, 2009First Untrimmed HP Cape to 96 summon, top 300 to 96 summonProud owner of the strength, magic, range, and hitpoints capes.Spa_Ins/LOLCANADA on IRC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mylez Posted March 27, 2009 Share Posted March 27, 2009 She's not the only one, trust me.   Plenty have done it before her, and plenty will continue to do so. It's pretty stupid I agree, but it's going to happen and I don't really see what all the fuss is about, besides the fact she's being treated extremely harshly. :roll: :|    I actually feel somewhat sorry for her, I remember at that age all I wanted to do was have fun (still do). And lots of my friends were first talking about sex, and actually starting to try it. There's nothing really wrong* with it as such, there's just alot of stigma attatched to acting outside of "government guidlines" ie, the law.   *Depending on your morals, and values. Some people will completely disagree with me, however I'm merely voicing my opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
l0rd Posted March 28, 2009 Author Share Posted March 28, 2009 No pics no prove i guess? :thumbsup:    On a more serious note: Dumb of her to post it on such a site, but it's even stranger for her to get a jail sentence for it. Like the mom said, she needs help.   Well, some people on /b/ were trying to find the profile. :-k   GTFO my TIF. No /b/ talk here :x   Trust me, that wasn't "/b/ talk". It was referencing to /b/.   If I talked like people do on /b/ I'd be banned faster than you can read a short novel. [iNSERT "I R EATIN TEH SHIX ATM" BILL COSBY SIGNATURE GIF HERE, LOL] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laura Posted March 28, 2009 Share Posted March 28, 2009 She's not a sexual offender in any way - legal or otherwise, because the law is simply faulty here. Those laws were set to protect children from exploitation by adults. And furthermore, there's nothing less than a sexual offender that is severe enough to compel anyone to stop their acts. If anything, a new law should be set as a median between no action and sexual offenses. But what really needs to be done is parental counseling and involvement. If I was 14, I'd be far more concerned about getting my phone taken away then status of "sexual offender." Something needs to be done, that's for sure, but it should not be to label a 14 year old girl a sex offender for the rest of her life when she can barely contemplate right from wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chained_life Posted March 28, 2009 Share Posted March 28, 2009 That's just hilarious. She shouldn't have been an idiot and posted them on Myspace. Secondly, I'm not sure how she'd be considered a sex offender, that's stupid.     Distributing child pornography. This sucks, parents need to start parenting these days :thumbdown: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dongleberry Posted March 28, 2009 Share Posted March 28, 2009 I don't get why she didn't just e-mail them...   And if that makes you a sex offender, then there are plenty of sex offenders in my school.   See this is exactly what I thought you'd do. post a link wait until you know how people will sway on the subject, then post vague information on why you think they are right. The problem with this situation is it isn't black and white. Is she stupid for doing this? YES! Is she guilty of taking naked pictures of an underage child? Yes.    The situation arrives on the base principle of child porn, that no matter what the idea that child porn is around is proof someone is a victim. You don't get a picture of an 8 year old girl and not think, someone abused her, because the photo exists is proof. The idea that a girl would willingly take a picture of herself challenges this theory. That she wasn't coerced nobody had any stake and this was a gift. There is literally no victim in the dissemination of this photo to someone she is in a relationship with. Myspace for people her age is considered private communication like a cell phone.    I think they DA is trying this because if she isn't charged with it, then anybody found with these photos aren't held accountable. Most likely they have evidence that there are people in custody of these photos and make sure they are convicted they have to proove that the photos themselves are illegal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1_man_army Posted March 28, 2009 Share Posted March 28, 2009 That's just hilarious. She shouldn't have been an idiot and posted them on Myspace. Secondly, I'm not sure how she'd be considered a sex offender, that's stupid.     Distributing child pornography. This sucks, parents need to start parenting these days :thumbdown:   While by the letter of the law your 100% correct, the reason there are laws against distributing child pornography is to protect children. This case is puzzling as the person involved here would normally be considered the victim if the material was distributed by somebody else, so it poses the question of whether you can be both the perpetrator and the victim of the same crime?   My own personal view over this is, because it is her that is depicted in these pictures that she is distributing then she shouldn't be charged. There is a difference between paedophiles distributing images of abuse and what is basically a very stupid girl who is trying to impress somebody (albeit in a very misguided way). He who learns must suffer, and, even in our sleep, pain that cannot forget falls drop by drop upon the heart,and in our own despair, against our will, comes wisdom to us by the awful grace of God. - Aeschylus (525 BC - 456 BC) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lionheart_0 Posted March 28, 2009 Share Posted March 28, 2009 I already knew that it is illegal for ANYONE to have and share child pornography (There was a case of two 16 years olds sharing pictures being prosecuted for having CP, I could understand that). I do feel that this is very different. Just because a girl took a picture of herself and uploaded it, she shouldn't be labled as a sex offender. It is as bad as looking at yourself in the mirror or going streaking while being under 18. Sig by IkuraiYour Guide to Posting! Behave or I will send my Moose mounted Beaver launchers at you! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
angryjoe Posted March 28, 2009 Share Posted March 28, 2009 Link to her myspace rakaminko? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dizzle229 Posted March 28, 2009 Share Posted March 28, 2009 Something needs to be done, that's for sure, but it should not be to label a 14 year old girl a sex offender for the rest of her life when she can barely contemplate right from wrong.   She's 14, not 2. Granted she's a dumb 14 year old, but that's plently old enough to know right from wrong. Get back here so I can rub your butt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Giordano Posted March 28, 2009 Share Posted March 28, 2009 She's not a sex offender, she's a [bleep]. Don't the cops know these terms? "The cry of the poor is not always just, but if you never hear it you'll never know what justice is." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Riku3220 Posted March 28, 2009 Share Posted March 28, 2009 Even if what she did was against the law they should label her as a sex offender, She'll have a hard time getting into college and finding a job when she's older having that kind of label on her police records. At most they need to fine her.   Isn't it in the MySpace code of conduct to not post any kind of pornography? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mmmcannibalism Posted March 28, 2009 Share Posted March 28, 2009 Isn't it in the MySpace code of conduct to not post any kind of pornography?   most likely, even so that just means MySpace can/should ban her acc   The idea that she will be labeled sex offendor is quite sickening. Sex Offendor status should be reserved for people that are actually a threat, not people that did something stupid and immature. Orthodoxy is unconciousnessthe only ones who should kill are those who are prepared to be killed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Makoto_the_Phoenix Posted March 28, 2009 Share Posted March 28, 2009 I don't think that she should be labeled or convicted as a sex-offender. There are some other charges to satisfy the punishment, but registering her as a sex offender virtually guarantees a crappy life for her. Linux User/Enthusiast | Full-Stack Software Engineer | Stack Overflow Member | GIMP User...Alright, the Elf City update lured me back to RS over a year ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lenin64 Posted March 28, 2009 Share Posted March 28, 2009 The idea that she will be labeled sex offendor is quite sickening. Sex Offendor status should be reserved for people that are actually a threat, not people that did something stupid and immature. Plus, was there actually any sex involved? Exactly. But even if that case is made with people that possess other child porn, it's all about context. Command the Murderous Chalices! Drink ye harpooners! drink and swear, ye men that man the deathful whaleboat's bow- Death to Moby Dick!BLOOD FOR THE BLOOD GOD! SKULLS FOR THE SKULL THRONE! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lenticular_J Posted March 28, 2009 Share Posted March 28, 2009 Man, if this goes through, she's going to have to introduce herself to neighbors and tell them she was convicted of child pornography. You know how [bleep]ed up that will make ... Everything for her? I doubt people will let her live in most neighborhoods, trying to kick her out before she can even explain. catch it now so you can like it before it went so mainstream Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dongleberry Posted March 28, 2009 Share Posted March 28, 2009 Don't forget her picture and address will be posted on a publicly accessible registry that lumps her with actual sex offenders. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lenin64 Posted March 28, 2009 Share Posted March 28, 2009 Don't forget her picture and address will be posted on a publicly accessible registry that lumps her with actual sex offenders. Think of the laughs to be had by visitors of the sites, though. And the confused expressions and eventual decisions that there must have been some mistake. Command the Murderous Chalices! Drink ye harpooners! drink and swear, ye men that man the deathful whaleboat's bow- Death to Moby Dick!BLOOD FOR THE BLOOD GOD! SKULLS FOR THE SKULL THRONE! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dongleberry Posted March 28, 2009 Share Posted March 28, 2009 Don't forget her picture and address will be posted on a publicly accessible registry that lumps her with actual sex offenders. Think of the laughs to be had by visitors of the sites, though. And the confused expressions and eventual decisions that there must have been some mistake.   Think of the actual child predators who know where this hurt little girl is located. Somehow her name is not allowed to be listed in the media but if you go to "state registry.com" you can find a picture, her charges, where she lives, her age. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MirageOfDeath Posted March 28, 2009 Share Posted March 28, 2009 Heh, 11 year old murderers, 13 year old fathers and now 14 year old 'sex offenders'... doubt she'll be a registered sex offender though when this is all done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
____ Posted March 28, 2009 Share Posted March 28, 2009 Heh, 11 year old murderers, 13 year old fathers and now 14 year old 'sex offenders'... doubt she'll be a registered sex offender though when this is all done. I can remember at least 5 cases where a female has been convinced of child pornography for sending illicet photos of herself to peers. And from memory, some of the male recipients were charged for possession of child pornography and most of them were then required to be registered as sex offenders.     I will not be surprised if this girl, and anyone who has the photos (even in their browser cache) is gone after for being in possession (or distributing - is the case of the girl) child porn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Errdoth Posted March 28, 2009 Share Posted March 28, 2009 I'm going to laugh if she's tried as an adult. Last.fm Signature Overlays Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now