Jump to content

Welcome to Rune Tips, the first ever RuneScape help site. We aim to offer skill guides, quest guides, maps, calculators, informative databases, tips, and much more to help you get the most from the Massive Online Adventure Game, RuneScape, by Jagex Ltd © 2009.

Report Ad

Welcome to Forum.Tip.It
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Photo

Tip.it Times 21 March 2010


  • Please log in to reply
51 replies to this topic

#21
the_korny
[ Display Name History ]

the_korny

    Bear Fur

  • Members
  • 262 posts
Article #1 was meh.

Why do we need two of each skill?
Something that takes 15 weeks vs something that takes 30 weeks?



Article #2 was also meh.

Its true that a trip to most bosses require being strong in melee and not many bosses (if any) are weak to magic. But Runescape has a boss that requires specialization and teamwork. Its called the Penance Queen. I'm guessing that Jagex saw the lack of people playing Barbarian Assault and assumed that specialization like that was not the way to go.
I've never seen Sixth Sense nor Inception nor many other popular movies and I intend to keep it that way.

#22
murtagah8
[ Display Name History ]

murtagah8

    Chicken Feather

  • Members
  • 10 posts
  • Joined:15 March 2010
Article 1 was interesting although personally I don't skill widely enough to really benefit from Shattered Hearts.

As for article 2...

"These free spirits need to be integrated into the community only if they wish it, as single-player alternatives remain. These single-player elements need to be less effective than their cooperating counterparts."

I'm sorry but, seriously? You say that free spirits need to be integrated into the community only if they wish it? You just used need to and only if they wish for the same subject? Also, it seems as though you're penalizing those of us who choose to be more solitary by making us " less effective than [our] cooperating counterparts." Yes I know it's an MMORPG, however, that does not give you the right to penalize someone if they choose to play a more solitary game. It really irks me when people try to force their ideology on others like that. :angry:

Oh and P.S. I'm not a loner, I'm just able to see a loner's viewpoint.

#23
tortilliachp
[ Display Name History ]

tortilliachp

    Hobgoblin Killer

  • Members
  • 1,693 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Norway
  • Joined:20 November 2004
  • RuneScape Status:None
  • RSN:nacho

Article #2 was also meh.

Its true that a trip to most bosses require being strong in melee and not many bosses (if any) are weak to magic. But Runescape has a boss that requires specialization and teamwork. Its called the Penance Queen. I'm guessing that Jagex saw the lack of people playing Barbarian Assault and assumed that specialization like that was not the way to go.


The penance queen can be killed by 5 level 80s (summoning included). the rewards have always been, and are still not comparable to any other bosses, and it takes 30 mins to get to the boss, and less than 10 mins to kill it. With a team that has played barbarian assault for a couple hours as individuals, you never fail killing the queen with ease. Mithril dragons are certainly more bosslike than BA. quite frankly, barbarian assault is popular with the lower levels to some degree, and is in no way master or elite in content or reward. does soul wars also constitute boss killing?

All bosses currrently can be farmed effectively with a small team of players all wearing the same gear. By all "bosses" i consider monsters that should be difficult to kill, not just a routine. If Jagex assumed anything about bosses comparable to the corporeal beast and god wars dungeon from an old minigame, i would be extremely surprised, and very pesimistic about the future of the game.

Article 1 was interesting although personally I don't skill widely enough to really benefit from Shattered Hearts.

As for article 2...

"These free spirits need to be integrated into the community only if they wish it, as single-player alternatives remain. These single-player elements need to be less effective than their cooperating counterparts."

I'm sorry but, seriously? You say that free spirits need to be integrated into the community only if they wish it? You just used need to and only if they wish for the same subject? Also, it seems as though you're penalizing those of us who choose to be more solitary by making us " less effective than [our] cooperating counterparts." Yes I know it's an MMORPG, however, that does not give you the right to penalize someone if they choose to play a more solitary game. It really irks me when people try to force their ideology on others like that. :angry:

Oh and P.S. I'm not a loner, I'm just able to see a loner's viewpoint.


reorganizing the words of the first sentence you quote, retaining the original meaning: "These free spirits need only to be integrated into the community if they wish it."

What i meant by the second sentence was obviously also unclear on my part: consider soloing bosses today. It's very inefficient, especially at god wars, because you spend your time mostly getting kill count, not fighting the actual boss. That means the single player alternative is clearly ineffective compared to a team strategy. That leaves you identical options as today: get a team, or spend more time on your own.

However, the single-player way of killing bosses should never be as efficient for the individual as working with a team. You have a free choice to play as a pure character, however in making that choice you sacrifice some aspects of the game. The same goes, and should go for those who choose to turn their public chats to "off", choose not to add friends to their friendslists, and choose to contribute to the runescape community.

#24
murtagah8
[ Display Name History ]

murtagah8

    Chicken Feather

  • Members
  • 10 posts
  • Joined:15 March 2010



Article #2 was also meh.

Its true that a trip to most bosses require being strong in melee and not many bosses (if any) are weak to magic. But Runescape has a boss that requires specialization and teamwork. Its called the Penance Queen. I'm guessing that Jagex saw the lack of people playing Barbarian Assault and assumed that specialization like that was not the way to go.


The penance queen can be killed by 5 level 80s (summoning included). the rewards have always been, and are still not comparable to any other bosses, and it takes 30 mins to get to the boss, and less than 10 mins to kill it. With a team that has played barbarian assault for a couple hours as individuals, you never fail killing the queen with ease. Mithril dragons are certainly more bosslike than BA. quite frankly, barbarian assault is popular with the lower levels to some degree, and is in no way master or elite in content or reward. does soul wars also constitute boss killing?

All bosses currrently can be farmed effectively with a small team of players all wearing the same gear. By all "bosses" i consider monsters that should be difficult to kill, not just a routine. If Jagex assumed anything about bosses comparable to the corporeal beast and god wars dungeon from an old minigame, i would be extremely surprised, and very pesimistic about the future of the game.

Article 1 was interesting although personally I don't skill widely enough to really benefit from Shattered Hearts.

As for article 2...

"These free spirits need to be integrated into the community only if they wish it, as single-player alternatives remain. These single-player elements need to be less effective than their cooperating counterparts."

I'm sorry but, seriously? You say that free spirits need to be integrated into the community only if they wish it? You just used need to and only if they wish for the same subject? Also, it seems as though you're penalizing those of us who choose to be more solitary by making us " less effective than [our] cooperating counterparts." Yes I know it's an MMORPG, however, that does not give you the right to penalize someone if they choose to play a more solitary game. It really irks me when people try to force their ideology on others like that. :angry:

Oh and P.S. I'm not a loner, I'm just able to see a loner's viewpoint.


reorganizing the words of the first sentence you quote, retaining the original meaning: "These free spirits need only to be integrated into the community if they wish it."

What i meant by the second sentence was obviously also unclear on my part: consider soloing bosses today. It's very inefficient, especially at god wars, because you spend your time mostly getting kill count, not fighting the actual boss. That means the single player alternative is clearly ineffective compared to a team strategy. That leaves you identical options as today: get a team, or spend more time on your own.

However, the single-player way of killing bosses should never be as efficient for the individual as working with a team. You have a free choice to play as a pure character, however in making that choice you sacrifice some aspects of the game. The same goes, and should go for those who choose to turn their public chats to "off", choose not to add friends to their friendslists, and choose to contribute to the runescape community.


Ok the first sentence makes more sense to me now. And the second sentence I can see where you're coming from now, I just thought you originally meant that players who are more solitary should be directly penalized for being solitary. But I agree with you that undoubtedly a solitary player should be indirectly penalized by not being as effective at killing bosses etc.

#25
blakdragon39
[ Display Name History ]

blakdragon39

    Hobgoblin Killer

  • Members
  • 1,658 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Joined:13 March 2005
  • RuneScape Status:None
  • RSN:Blakdragon39
  • Clan:MASORS
In response to the second article:
I kind of like being a lone player. I don't participate much in group activities, and thats the way I like it. However, I do really like the idea of needing multiple classes of people to take on monsters. That sounds like a lot of fun. I would love to take an a monster like that, could try out whatever class you wanted. ^^
Posted Image

#26
fredgiblet
[ Display Name History ]

fredgiblet

    Chicken Feather

  • Members
  • 2 posts
  • Joined:23 March 2010
Re: Second article

"different complementary roles should be the foundation of most activities"

No. Fun should be the foundation of most activities, forcing people to not do things because their friends aren't on or their friends aren't interested in that right now or their friends are too busy with something else isn't fun.

"All bosses should be most effectively killed with at least one mage, one ranger and one mêléer."

No. To borrow a word you use repeatedly, there should be diversity. There should be bosses that can be defeated solo by mid-level people of each side of the triangle, there should be bosses that can only be soloed by high-level users of each side, there should be bosses that require combinations of mid-level players, etc.

" Quests involving cooperation with players who make different choices is a niche Jagex explored early on in the game, but moved away from. That was a mistake."

No, it wasn't. I've seen people standing in the GE begging someone to help them with Heroes' Quest for 10 minutes before they gave up and went to do something else, why would you want to make that more common? Quests that are easier to do with a group but still possible to do on your own (like Blood Runs Deep) or that offer other incentives for teamwork (like for instance if raiding Movario's base in WGS required a friend to help) are OK, but requiring multiple members is a bad idea. If Jagex starts doing that very often, well, there's plenty of other things I should be doing with my time, and that $6 a month could probably be going somewhere better too.

"These free spirits need to be integrated into the community only if they wish it"

So as long as we don't want a quest cape at all we'll be just fine, good to know.

"That is how Runescape remains relevant for the future, and players spend longer with the game before growing bored and moving on."

I doubt this, cutting people off from things their friends don't want to do isn't going to help keep people interested in the game, it effectively puts you at the mercy of the whims of your friends. You love that new skill? Better hope like hell that your friends like it too or else you're screwed

#27
Nifflin
[ Display Name History ]

Nifflin

    Hobgoblin Killer

  • Members
  • 1,722 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Location:Amman, Jordan
  • Joined:17 March 2010
  • RuneScape Status:P2P
  • RSN:Nifflin
  • RSN2:Runnersdie
I think the thing about the second article is this. We all miss those days a lot, many aspects of the game were more community based, specialization made the game less monotonous. However, it would certainly be a pain in the rear to go back. I doubt anyone would. What would be interesting is if higher level items were released that could not be traded over the GE, just person to person. Maybe this would bring back the specialized skill feeling to an extent. The only problem would be trade limits and I don't know how putting this into place would work. The point about the bosses is right on. Perhaps they could implement something where the first melee person on a team does 100% damage, the second 90%, the third 80% and so on with the same for range and mage so that it would be preferable to have for example two melee, two range and a mage at a Bandos trip over simply five melee.

Great articles :D Thanks guys!

PM me in game anytime


#28
Zepheras
[ Display Name History ]

Zepheras

    Scorpion Pit

  • Members
  • 655 posts
  • Location:Lumbridge. Many many times...
  • Joined:26 December 2006

Re: Second article

"different complementary roles should be the foundation of most activities"

No. Fun should be the foundation of most activities, forcing people to not do things because their friends aren't on or their friends aren't interested in that right now or their friends are too busy with something else isn't fun.

"All bosses should be most effectively killed with at least one mage, one ranger and one mêléer."

No. To borrow a word you use repeatedly, there should be diversity. There should be bosses that can be defeated solo by mid-level people of each side of the triangle, there should be bosses that can only be soloed by high-level users of each side, there should be bosses that require combinations of mid-level players, etc.

" Quests involving cooperation with players who make different choices is a niche Jagex explored early on in the game, but moved away from. That was a mistake."

No, it wasn't. I've seen people standing in the GE begging someone to help them with Heroes' Quest for 10 minutes before they gave up and went to do something else, why would you want to make that more common? Quests that are easier to do with a group but still possible to do on your own (like Blood Runs Deep) or that offer other incentives for teamwork (like for instance if raiding Movario's base in WGS required a friend to help) are OK, but requiring multiple members is a bad idea. If Jagex starts doing that very often, well, there's plenty of other things I should be doing with my time, and that $6 a month could probably be going somewhere better too.

"These free spirits need to be integrated into the community only if they wish it"

So as long as we don't want a quest cape at all we'll be just fine, good to know.

"That is how Runescape remains relevant for the future, and players spend longer with the game before growing bored and moving on."

I doubt this, cutting people off from things their friends don't want to do isn't going to help keep people interested in the game, it effectively puts you at the mercy of the whims of your friends. You love that new skill? Better hope like hell that your friends like it too or else you're screwed



Your post is one helluva joke. What you really need is an offline version of RuneScape. Throw in some NPC with the AI to train and compete with you on the highscore table.

Edit:

Before I get accused of just skimming through your post, I better post some additional information.

Sure, fun should be the foundation of games, but first off, everyone's definition of 'fun' is different. In the context of MMORPGs, if teamwork and cooperation isn't your cup of tea, why are you even playing? Lots of RPGs out there have good storylines and even discussion forums. In the context of RuneScape specifically, if soloing is your idea of fun, you'll be glad to find that being an absolute loner still allows you to proceed through the game (perhaps slower), except for TWO quests and some minigame rewards. However, if team-based boss and group quests are released more and more often, there will be people who enjoy it. I won't mind if another whole chunk of such content, as large as the current solo-able content that we have, gets added to the game.


And to Kalafai. Oh, it's the "I don't want to have to do it" argument? Keep your demands for the real world. If you need 13.034mil to get level 99 in a skill, you have to do it, like it or not. The community fails sometimes, when people question the issue of solo versus teamplay FIRST when say, a new un-soloable boss gets added to the game, rather than discussing about team work and tactics and how good the drops are. In fact, the better the drop, the more likely people would whine. "OMG RuneScape is a MMO, team-based activities are a total basphemy! It's a consipracy by Jagex to changed all previous content to team-based gameplay!"
Posted Image

"Do you really want to go back to the time when Falador was grey, lesser demon look like goats, dragons look like cows, hellhound look like cats and your character stands as stiff as a statue?"

-F1775


#29
Kalafai
[ Display Name History ]

Kalafai

    Scorpion Pit

  • Members
  • 605 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Downtowne Varrok
  • Joined:7 October 2009
  • RuneScape Status:P2P
  • RSN:Time Kitten
  • RSN2:Kalafai

Your post is one helluva joke. What you really need is an offline version of RuneScape. Throw in some NPC with the AI to train and compete with you on the highscore table.


*facepalm*

Really?

Is someone going around encouraging people to see in monochromatic tones?

I for one like playing with people, but don't want to have to play with people.

#30
tortilliachp
[ Display Name History ]

tortilliachp

    Hobgoblin Killer

  • Members
  • 1,693 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Norway
  • Joined:20 November 2004
  • RuneScape Status:None
  • RSN:nacho

Re: Second article

"different complementary roles should be the foundation of most activities"

No. Fun should be the foundation of most activities, forcing people to not do things because their friends aren't on or their friends aren't interested in that right now or their friends are too busy with something else isn't fun.

"All bosses should be most effectively killed with at least one mage, one ranger and one mêléer."

No. To borrow a word you use repeatedly, there should be diversity. There should be bosses that can be defeated solo by mid-level people of each side of the triangle, there should be bosses that can only be soloed by high-level users of each side, there should be bosses that require combinations of mid-level players, etc.


"Fun" requires variation and diversity. I stand by that point. complementary roles ensure many different ways of playing the exact same content. that's the beauty of it: being a ranger, a mage and a meleer in the same situation are all different things. I may like the intense clicking of "catching" a boss and tanking it, bosses may have varying weaknesses, requiring extra clicking for a mage etc. There would be many different things to choose from: thus, more of us find fun in every new piece of content: it's utilitarian to have variation.

There are so many ways in which the three roles may be incorporated that needing at least 3 people to fight any boss, of different roles does not limit the veriety in the bosses, the other mechanics of the bosses do. If you can't find 2 people to perform an activity with on the RSOF, in clan chats, or on your own friendslist within 10 minutes, you're obviously not an active member of the community, and don't really care either way because "it requires a tad of effort to find out where i can consistently find teams of likeminded, likable gamers"
I agree that other elements also have to be incorporated, making every boss unique, not like the KQ and KBD for instance, where the only thing that seperates them is their combat level, and minor details in what gear you bring. there should indeed be different mechanics for different bosses, making them "fun". That would lead to more complex roles within teams as well, and the mages /rangers /magers / vengancer / skiller elements or whatever also become more varied, and not just another "tank job" or "range from a distance".


Any boss that can be killed solo at a lower level will be camped to death by high leveled players. They are obsolete, and the current bosses are mid-level bosses. I'm pretty sure almost anyone can solo the KBD with combat stats of 80, if they range mage or melee. The current bosses require combinations of mid-level players. People complain of the need for "instanced bosses" as high leveled teams are taking all the lootshare worlds for these bosses, evidence in point that your situation will not, and cannot work.

Soloable bosses are like the metal dragons (here, especially mithril) and the chaos elemental: they are normal creatures, but a little stronger. They are not real bosses.

The rest of your post concerns a gaming style where you do not interact with the players around you, only "friends" you have from before. That is exactly the attitude that hurts runescape in so many ways. That's the selfishness, "crashing", stealing spawns for killing and hunting, half-killing for slayer xp. That's the spamming, the begging, the "can i borrow", the bug abuse, the manipulation clans, the pre-agreed rules dm cheaters while pking. That is where flaming originates, hostility, and conversations that almost never progress beyond question: answer, even though there are 20 players woodcutting the same ivy.

Relations between players in the gaming environment, not on their friendslist determines how the community acts almost all of the time. That is where the general enjoyment of a game is completely ruined by "noobs" or maturity, positivism and enjoyment emnate.

#31
Tritous
[ Display Name History ]

Tritous

    Goblin Armour

  • Members
  • 87 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Location:Kurl
  • Joined:23 June 2008
  • RuneScape Status:P2P
  • RSN:Dor Kadar
  • Clan:The Immortal Legion
specialisation:

"Runescape doomsday 2009", an old RSOF topic run by Kaiser Alan and myself was a look into economic inflation / price depreciation. At least it started that way, when I got involved I put a twist on it with the concept of value depreciation regardless of gold inflation or deflation, and to that added the points of intangible values. What is a 99 worth now? You see a lvl 99 cook and think "even a legends cape is harder to get". that 99 fletcher just used it to trim his str cape. 99 combats is virtually the norm and as far as items go, what sort of loser doesnt have barrow armour? (the best non pvp armour for defence).

Remember when Guthans was 15m? When bowstrings were 200 ea? How you'd be impressed by people with a whip? The value of these things is now next to nowt to image. The GE only made it worse for tradable items as they are only more and more heavily harvested....

but people never pay attention to skills again...

The only solution after this 7000 post thread (had to be remade 3 times) was to cut off the level cap. Keep 99 capes, but allow it to go past it. I've not yet found a proper formula for the exp per level (and I did a big analysis as practice for maths at uni), but we can estimate a few things: anyone with 200m exp probably wont even reach lvl 110. To get to lvl 120 you are probably into multiple billions for exp, dont ask about lvl 130.....So what good is that?

Imagine someone who gives up on all other skills except cooking. Trains cooking 24/7, is a few hundred million exp ahead of second place. Now when the first lvl 110 fisher stands proud in the game and gets a message that they can harpoon Shenfish (and it's not in the manual, it's a complete surprise hidden waiting in the game until enough have discovered it to be common knowledge) they find out only one person in the game can cook it and while the competition is zero these two form a partnership of the elite.

Imagine being the only person in the game who can mine a new level 110 ore, having 4-5 smithers in a price battle begging to be able to smelt it. You know you'll never have time to get the smith level yourself' you are a miner and nothing else!. What about when they find out no one yet has the defence level to wear it, and people are racing to be the first person to wear this new insanely strong armour and stand temporarily immortal compared to others. You see before you the only person in the game with some new 3 handed, 10 bladed, mace-swordhammer and you just run, you don't even bother trying to fight because you know they have 125 attack and will never miss you, but if you can get a chance to range them with your 115 ranged knowing what their def is like...

What we are missing is the ability to truely be the top. hiscores are just numbers when they could be status, ability, uniqueness. Who seriously cares who has the highest total level, it's the true masters we want to see, not the jack of alls. Once people get to a majority of 99s they'll have to start thinking: what is the skill I want to devote my character to? What is it I want more than everything else combined? And there will not be enough time in the world to master more than one...
Creater of QuestRanker

"I hate it when my target's die laughing, makes me think my fly is open or something"
-Me

#32
gompo
[ Display Name History ]

gompo

    Chicken Feather

  • Members
  • 23 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Joined:8 January 2010
  • RuneScape Status:P2P
  • RSN:Gompo
  • Clan:AESOP
i am an older player of Runescape, most of the other players i call friends are older players as well. we have families, jobs, and many other real life activities that tend to make playing Runescape activities that require teamwork darn near impossible.

sure, i could try to find other players to attmpt to accomplish tasks that require teamwork, but would they be understanding that i may not be able to finish the task in the time that they have available? i play on dial up, are they going to die if i lose connection, will they be willing to try it again after they die? will they understand that i lag? that i may not be as "smart" as they are (capable of making the right decision at the right time)?

i could go on and on.

as it is, i tend to shy away from other players. i have been burned over and over by players who go out of their way to cause problems for whatever reason they have. players begging (i admit, that seems to have improved a lot) not willing to research anything (i was just at a star with a level 110 who didnt know what it is), unwilling to earn the levels and beg for assist or loan.

as it is, there are many activities that require teams, castle wars, BA, great orb, stealing creation, pest control as well as bosses that can be taken as teams if teams so choose to do it.

i remember looking for help with the shield of avrov (whatever it was called) i ended up paying 10k (quite a bit of gold for a newb like i was at the time), just to see the guy laugh call me a noob and dissapear with my cash (just what i deserved for being trusting). woot that was fun.

anyway, i am all for teams for activities, just dont make activities that are "required" to finish a task (ex. quests) "require" a team,

being dependant on others is not what i consider fun.

ravian said:

"And to Kalafai. Oh, it's the "I don't want to have to do it" argument? Keep your demands for the real world. If you need 13.034mil to get level 99 in a skill, you have to do it, like it or not."
*snip*

if i had to depend on a partner to get that 13.034mil xp points to get a 99 in a skill, i would not like it and would not do it.

i agree with what Kalafai said :

"I for one like playing with people, but don't want to have to play with people."

DITTO!!!

No matter where you go, there you are.



Posted Image


#33
Serpent Eye
[ Display Name History ]

Serpent Eye

    Retired Crew

  • Members
  • 3,466 posts
Both articles were very enjoyable reads!

=)

I consider myself to be a skiller, through and through, so like Racheya, I am very much enjoying Shattered Hearts! :thumbsup: While I don't think I will complete the statue even relatively close to 30 weeks from now (there are skills I simply avoid :P) it is nice to have SOME sort of reward for my effort, other than EXP. :P

There are certain aspects of the second article that I agree with, and certain aspects that I disagree with or simply don't care about (bosses? I don't really care how easy or difficult they are, as I don't engage in combat really) -- but overall, it was great to reflect on how RS used to be, what RS is, and what RS can be like in the future. :thumbup:

glut.gif
2tchvHp.png


#34
fredgiblet
[ Display Name History ]

fredgiblet

    Chicken Feather

  • Members
  • 2 posts
  • Joined:23 March 2010

Sure, fun should be the foundation of games, but first off, everyone's definition of 'fun' is different.


Find me someone who finds standing in the GE spamming "LFG" is fun, please. Some people like PKing, some people like playing SC for 6 hours every day, very few people are going to find standing around waiting for other people all the time fun, and the people that do are playing Progress Quest.

In the context of MMORPGs, if teamwork and cooperation isn't your cup of tea, why are you even playing?


Achieving personal milestones, 50+, 60+, 70+ in every skill, 100, 110, 120 combat, enough cash to get full Bandos, level 75 rc for the Ardougne diary, need I go on? There's an enormous amount of content for single-players in RS.

if soloing is your idea of fun, you'll be glad to find that being an absolute loner still allows you to proceed through the game (perhaps slower), except for TWO quests and some minigame rewards.


And the entire point of this thread is about an article claiming that such should be expanded, I have no real problem with the game as it is now, I recognize that some content is pretty much team-only and that's not a real issue, the idea that ALL the good content MUST be team-only is an issue.

The rest of your post concerns a gaming style where you do not interact with the players around you, only "friends" you have from before. That is exactly the attitude that hurts runescape in so many ways. That's the selfishness, "crashing", stealing spawns for killing and hunting, half-killing for slayer xp. That's the spamming, the begging, the "can i borrow", the bug abuse, the manipulation clans, the pre-agreed rules dm cheaters while pking. That is where flaming originates, hostility, and conversations that almost never progress beyond question: answer, even though there are 20 players woodcutting the same ivy.


Notably, I almost never engage in any of those activities and despise those who do. Perhaps you need to reconsider your position on those of us who don't care for constant teamplay.

#35
Zepheras
[ Display Name History ]

Zepheras

    Scorpion Pit

  • Members
  • 655 posts
  • Location:Lumbridge. Many many times...
  • Joined:26 December 2006

Sure, fun should be the foundation of games, but first off, everyone's definition of 'fun' is different.


Find me someone who finds standing in the GE spamming "LFG" is fun, please. Some people like PKing, some people like playing SC for 6 hours every day, very few people are going to find standing around waiting for other people all the time fun, and the people that do are playing Progress Quest.


And some people like group content. You're telling me that you'll be biting Jagex's head off if they try to release some teamwork based content tomorrow. Gimme a break.

In the context of MMORPGs, if teamwork and cooperation isn't your cup of tea, why are you even playing?


Achieving personal milestones, 50+, 60+, 70+ in every skill, 100, 110, 120 combat, enough cash to get full Bandos, level 75 rc for the Ardougne diary, need I go on? There's an enormous amount of content for single-players in RS.


In the context of MMORPGs? Your example of milestones are found in offline RPGs, not just MMOs (Get eight bages, beat Elite Four...). It is clear that if RuneScape suddenly becomes a offline Java game for one day you won't even notice the difference.

if soloing is your idea of fun, you'll be glad to find that being an absolute loner still allows you to proceed through the game (perhaps slower), except for TWO quests and some minigame rewards.


And the entire point of this thread is about an article claiming that such should be expanded, I have no real problem with the game as it is now, I recognize that some content is pretty much team-only and that's not a real issue, the idea that ALL the good content MUST be team-only is an issue.


I don't think the author is specifically talking about promoting teamwork in every aspect of the game, but rather how specification in a certain role and playing your part for the community can be a rewarding gaming experience. It used to be the case with skill specification, but that obviously can't last long when the game advocates being an all-rounder instead of a class system like smithers and woodcutters. He raised the example of boss fights because that's the prime example where people have to select a role and do well in it in order to benefit the team. If you read the article describing RS classic and thought, "Wow, the good old days of teamwork and cooperation and community", then I don't see why you would flinch at the thought of working together.

The rest of your post concerns a gaming style where you do not interact with the players around you, only "friends" you have from before. That is exactly the attitude that hurts runescape in so many ways. That's the selfishness, "crashing", stealing spawns for killing and hunting, half-killing for slayer xp. That's the spamming, the begging, the "can i borrow", the bug abuse, the manipulation clans, the pre-agreed rules dm cheaters while pking. That is where flaming originates, hostility, and conversations that almost never progress beyond question: answer, even though there are 20 players woodcutting the same ivy.


Notably, I almost never engage in any of those activities and despise those who do. Perhaps you need to reconsider your position on those of us who don't care for constant teamplay.


No comments on this.
Posted Image

"Do you really want to go back to the time when Falador was grey, lesser demon look like goats, dragons look like cows, hellhound look like cats and your character stands as stiff as a statue?"

-F1775


#36
lordkafei
[ Display Name History ]

lordkafei

    Demon Vanquisher

  • Members
  • 2,123 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Location:Pico and Sepulveda
  • Joined:6 October 2004
  • RuneScape Status:Retired
  • RSN:Kafei Nation

...

The only solution after this 7000 post thread (had to be remade 3 times) was to cut off the level cap. Keep 99 capes, but allow it to go past it. I've not yet found a proper formula for the exp per level (and I did a big analysis as practice for maths at uni), but we can estimate a few things: anyone with 200m exp probably wont even reach lvl 110. To get to lvl 120 you are probably into multiple billions for exp, dont ask about lvl 130.....So what good is that?

...


I've seen the formula online somewhere (a long time ago) and put it in my omnibus spreadsheet.
I put it on Rapidshare if you want to look at it (MD5: CB979BDEA574A8CA91BE18C318318122).

PvP is not for me

In the 3rd Year of the Boycott
Real-world money saved since FT/W: Hundreds of Dollars
Real-world time saved since FT/W: Thousands of Hours


#37
Unknown_Warrior
[ Display Name History ]

Unknown_Warrior

    Varrock Guard

  • Members
  • 1,328 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Belgium
  • Joined:13 July 2006
  • RuneScape Status:P2P
  • RSN:The Warrior
I could not disagree harder with the second article.
The first was okay, but didn't really get me thinking. Quite a shame.

Still, the second article... No, just utterly and totally no.

Unknown_Warrior.jpegIgGCP.png

Dragon Drops : 5 Dragon Medium Helmets, 3 Dragon Claws, 3 Dragon platelegs, 2 Dragon plateskirts, 2 Dragon Hatchets, 2 Dragon Spears, 7 pairs of Dragon Boots, 1 Dragon pickaxe, 10 Dragon defenders, 3 Dragon 2h swords, 1 Dragon armour Slice, 1 Dragon armour Lump, 1 Dragon chainbody, 1 Dragon kiteshield, 1 Dragon hasta, 1 Dragon ward, 25 Dragon knives pairs
The Warrior's Blog , Herblore Habitat - Efficient and profitable

Stats and logs

#38
waheera1
[ Display Name History ]

waheera1

    Unicorn Horn

  • Members
  • 161 posts
  • Joined:11 December 2007
Not gonna lie, I'm appalled at the intolerance being shown on these forums this week.

Just because someone disagrees with you does not mean that they are wrong, their opinions are invalid, or that you must therefore ignore the real reasons for their comments and, instead, get your kicks trying to smash their argument to the ground.

The articles were fine, the responses to them should embarrass those who have indulged their peculiar fetish for directing deprecating comments at complete strangers.

#39
canadiansmurf
[ Display Name History ]

canadiansmurf

    Bear Fur

  • Members
  • 255 posts
  • Joined:31 May 2009
Just for you Waheehra1

The first article was amateur, and terrible as all it did is say this is great, oh sure there are one or two minor flaws but this is GREAT content. I like rainbows and Jagex.
Terrible effort. To write so much and say so little. Especially nothing that was said in that article was new.




The second article is much better as it has an opinion and is generating discussion.
Some fresh ideas were presented, although overall I don't agree with the second articles author.
It seems like they want RS to turn into WOW.

#40
MistressGlo
[ Display Name History ]

MistressGlo

    Chicken Feather

  • Members
  • 11 posts
  • Location:Oklahoma
  • Joined:15 May 2006

I have nothing to say about article #1 that I haven't already said in the Shattered Heart thread here.

I couldn't disagree more vehemently with article #2.

It was Beowulf who killed Grendel - not Beowulf & Eye1HitU in a team effort.
It was Hercules who cleaned the Augean stables - not Hercules, Sparkles129 & FumbDuck.

I could throw out other literary examples... but the point is it's a singular hero that takes on the task & gets the glory. That's what we remember & glorify. That's what I expect from my MMO.

More quests where you have to work in pairs or trios or more would drive me to canceling my subscription.


I agree with you on article #2 . I love playing RS and have been playing four years. I became a member after 2 weeks of free play. I talk to my friends, but I do most of my activities on my own. Not everyone plays just to kill a boss or to be in a clan. Playing RS is a way I like to relax instead of watching TV, etc. If Jagex started making the quests where I had to depend on another person to complete it then I would have no sense of individual accomplishment. ATM you have a choice to do things as a group or as an individual. That to me is the best of both worlds. They offer mini games that are group ways of training skills such as the Blast Furnace, Stealing Creation, Barbarian Assault, and Trouble Brewing. To counter balance those they have mini games that can be done as an individual such as Beacon Network, Jade Vine, Phoenix Lair, and more. If Jagex starts making the majority of their updates to cater to only those who think we must do things in groups and that "single players should be less effective than their cooperating counterparts" isn't that like saying unless we play as a group we are not as important. People who would rather not do the group thing work just as hard to achieve their levels and accomplishments and are just as important to this game as those who play in groups.
Posted Image




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users