Alg Posted June 12, 2010 Share Posted June 12, 2010 You support it and they call themselves a humanitarian flotilla meaning you agree with them if you support themThere's a fallacy in there somewhere. Not sure which one though, I don't keep a list, but if any of the more knowledgeable posters do, please say it... :lol:It's interesting that you post this after mentioning how blinded the anti-Israel side is, though. I painted some stuff and put it on tumblr Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tortilliachp Posted June 12, 2010 Share Posted June 12, 2010 You support it and they call themselves a humanitarian flotilla meaning you agree with them if you support themThere's a fallacy in there somewhere. Not sure which one though, I don't keep a list, but if any of the more knowledgeable posters do, please say it... :lol:It's interesting that you post this after mentioning how blinded the anti-Israel side is, though. IT is a red herring, specifically an "irrelevant conclusion" fallacy. a) You support itb ) they call themselves a humanitarian flotillaconclusion: you support it therefore [fallacy] you also call it a humanitarian flotilla. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ISREAL63 Posted June 12, 2010 Share Posted June 12, 2010 You support it and they call themselves a humanitarian flotilla meaning you agree with them if you support themThere's a fallacy in there somewhere. Not sure which one though, I don't keep a list, but if any of the more knowledgeable posters do, please say it... :lol:It's interesting that you post this after mentioning how blinded the anti-Israel side is, though. IT is a red herring, specifically an "irrelevant conclusion" fallacy. a) You support itb ) they call themselves a humanitarian flotillaconclusion: you support it therefore [fallacy] you also call it a humanitarian flotilla. My point exactly, if someone calls themselves something and then you support them you agree with what they are calling themselves Thank you tortilliachp for your support :thumbsup: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fakeitormakeit2 Posted June 12, 2010 Share Posted June 12, 2010 You support it and they call themselves a humanitarian flotilla meaning you agree with them if you support themThere's a fallacy in there somewhere. Not sure which one though, I don't keep a list, but if any of the more knowledgeable posters do, please say it... :lol:It's interesting that you post this after mentioning how blinded the anti-Israel side is, though. IT is a red herring, specifically an "irrelevant conclusion" fallacy. a) You support itb ) they call themselves a humanitarian flotillaconclusion: you support it therefore [fallacy] you also call it a humanitarian flotilla.My point exactly, if someone calls themselves something and then you support them you agree with what they are calling themselves Thank you tortilliachp for your support :thumbsup:I believe you are using the reasoning fallacy "[bleep] hoc ergo propter hoc", I think that's the term. The incorrect assumption of an irrelevant conclusion due to solely its association. He who wears his morality but as his best garment were better naked... Your daily life is your temple and your religion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tortilliachp Posted June 12, 2010 Share Posted June 12, 2010 You support it and they call themselves a humanitarian flotilla meaning you agree with them if you support themThere's a fallacy in there somewhere. Not sure which one though, I don't keep a list, but if any of the more knowledgeable posters do, please say it... :lol:It's interesting that you post this after mentioning how blinded the anti-Israel side is, though. IT is a red herring, specifically an "irrelevant conclusion" fallacy. a) You support itb ) they call themselves a humanitarian flotillaconclusion: you support it therefore [fallacy] you also call it a humanitarian flotilla.My point exactly, if someone calls themselves something and then you support them you agree with what they are calling themselves Thank you tortilliachp for your support :thumbsup:I believe you are using the reasoning fallacy "[bleep] hoc ergo propter hoc", I think that's the term. The incorrect assumption of an irrelevant conclusion due to solely its association. [bleep] hoc ergo propter hoc literally translates into "correlation doesn't imply causation" I see no correlation between supporting the flotilla, and calling it humanitarian (as these are not related in any way, because the flotilla itself claimed they had a different goal). Therefore, you have to imply a correlation to imply causation, which by definition is an irrelevant conclusion because of a simplified assumption in connecting a) and b ) into a conclusion at all. (sorry, theory of knowledge in high school makes me very picky when it comes to these things) Israel63: My point posted out why you couldn't say what you said based on the information you provided. it doesn't make sense. A fallacy is an argument that doesn't make sense. there are different types of these. Another example is that i could say "This apple is red, therefore all apples are red" you make the same kind of mistake in your argument, where you connect things that are not necessarily right to combine into a conclusion. A better example might be for me to say that "you are from Israel, Israel is a Jewish country, therefore you must be Jewish" i know there is no law in Israel that you have to be Jewish, so the argument doesn't make sense. Did you understand that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qeltar Posted June 12, 2010 Share Posted June 12, 2010 Did you understand that?You're kidding... right? :lol: Qeltar, aka Charles KozierokWebmaster, RuneScoop - Premium RuneScape Information for Expert Players -- Now Free!Featuring the Ultimate Guide to Dungeoneering -- everything you need to know to get the most of the new skill! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
obfuscator Posted June 12, 2010 Share Posted June 12, 2010 I never claimed there was any new information there, I only thought it would be interesting to show. "It's not a rest for me, it's a rest for the weights." - Dom Mazzetti Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tortilliachp Posted June 12, 2010 Share Posted June 12, 2010 Did you understand that?You're kidding... right? :lol: No. he misunderstood my first post, so i wanted to make sure he understood my clarification post :) It wasn't directed at everyone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ISREAL63 Posted June 13, 2010 Share Posted June 13, 2010 Did you understand that?You're kidding... right? :lol: No. he misunderstood my first post, so i wanted to make sure he understood my clarification post :) It wasn't directed at everyoneI think i understood what you are saying but i don't understand how what i said doesn't make sense Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alg Posted June 13, 2010 Share Posted June 13, 2010 I think i understood what you are saying but i don't understand how what i said doesn't make senseIt makes sense in that it could be understood, but it just isn't logical to claim that not supporting Israel's policies means supporting Israel's enemies.I could probably have explained that far better than I did. I painted some stuff and put it on tumblr Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ISREAL63 Posted June 13, 2010 Share Posted June 13, 2010 It makes sense in that it could be understood, but it just isn't logical to claim that not supporting Israel's policies means supporting Israel's enemies.I could probably have explained that far better than I did. When did i say if you don't support Israel's policies then you support Israel's enemies? i never said that or anything like that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alg Posted June 13, 2010 Share Posted June 13, 2010 It makes sense in that it could be understood, but it just isn't logical to claim that not supporting Israel's policies means supporting Israel's enemies.I could probably have explained that far better than I did. When did i say if you don't support Israel's policies then you support Israel's enemies? i never said that or anything like thatYou support it and they call themselves a humanitarian flotilla meaning you agree with them if you support themAnd given the context that I brutally ripped that quote from there weren't many other interpretations for it. I painted some stuff and put it on tumblr Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ISREAL63 Posted June 13, 2010 Share Posted June 13, 2010 And given the context that I brutally ripped that quote from there weren't many other interpretations for it. I like how you are playing with my words what i said is if you support it and they call themselves a humanitarian flotilla that means you agree that they are a humanitarian flotilla even if their plan (a least the people aboard the Mavi Marmara) was to attack IDF soilders not to bring Humanitarian Aid there was no Humanitarian Aid aboard the Mavi Marmara where the IDF solders were attacked and killed 9 of the attackers http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/news.aspx/137997 http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/news.aspx/137799 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
obfuscator Posted June 13, 2010 Share Posted June 13, 2010 And given the context that I brutally ripped that quote from there weren't many other interpretations for it. I like how you are playing with my words what i said is if you support it and they call themselves a humanitarian flotilla that means you agree that they are a humanitarian flotilla even if their plan (a least the people aboard the Mavi Marmara) was to attack IDF soilders not to bring Humanitarian Aid there was no Humanitarian Aid aboard the Mavi Marmara where the IDF solders were attacked and killed 9 of the attackers http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/news.aspx/137997 http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/news.aspx/137799 Ok, I've tried to see where you're going with this, but stating that "there was no Humanitarian Aid" aboard the Mavi Marmar is completely ridiculous. There's absolutely zero evidence to indicate that the "plan" was to "attack" Israeli soldiers. If that had been the plan, you'd think they would have at least thought to bring weapons to accomplish it properly. It seems to me that they objected to Israel searching their ship (which Israel had every right to do, albeit not in international waters) they tried (stupidly) to prevent them from boarding, and paid the price. "It's not a rest for me, it's a rest for the weights." - Dom Mazzetti Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ISREAL63 Posted June 13, 2010 Share Posted June 13, 2010 Ok, I've tried to see where you're going with this, but stating that "there was no Humanitarian Aid" aboard the Mavi Marmar is completely ridiculous. There was no humanitarian aid on the Mavi Marmara it was a passenger ship not a freighter ship there were 7 ship ships in the flotilla only 3 were freighter ships please read link because i don't think you believe me http://www.israelpolitik.org/2010/06/10/no-aid-found-on-turkish-vessel-mavi-marmara/ There's absolutely zero evidence to indicate that the "plan" was to "attack" Israeli soldiers. If that had been the plan, you'd think they would have at least thought to bring weapons to accomplish it properly. There is loads of evidence showing it was preplanned violence http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1I6XL2pzguE&feature=channel http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OkXDev2wXVA&feature=channel http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HZlSSaPT_OU&feature=player_embedded http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JvS9PXZ3RWM&feature=related http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/stephaniegutmann/100041771/gaza-flotilla-assault-what-really-happened-aboard-the-mavi-marmara/ It seems to me that they objected to Israel searching their ship (which Israel had every right to do, albeit not in international waters) they tried (stupidly) to prevent them from boarding, and paid the price.At least we can agree on something which means we can make progress Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now