Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
@Dan3HitU

Was it really EoC that ruined RuneScape?

Recommended Posts

 

 

After years of players screaming about the broken combat triangle, Jagex made an honest attempt at fixing it. The problem was that, when they put the EoC into beta, the poo-flinging-player-base decided that they’d rather trade phats and Nex Armour than actually play-test it.

 

Crazy, I know, but there it is ...

icon_wall.gif

 

I know, and this is the problem with those people:

 

 

 

 

Then they go and complain that the final release is too crappy even though all they've been doing was sit there and "selling seismic wand 2b shards!" all day just for it to all disappear once the beta ends.

There's one other issue that isn't covered, I see. :wall:

 

Back when EOC was in Beta, Jagex had the utter stupidity to test for P2P-only for most of the time. Worse, when they let it be tested by F2P, they totally didn't give enough time on it. I was one of the ones who tried to check out the beta, but being Pure-F2P, I couldn't get enough time to properly go through even the mere tutorial for combat. Jagex had the stupidity to only give like a week or two, where nothing less than two months was necessary for F2P to have a chance to help Jagex work out bugs and get it right! Even worse, I fell afoul of tutorial-breaking bugs that prevented completion, and even though I submitted bug reports on it, Jagex didn't keep it in beta long enough to push testable fixes so I could see if they got it right. So finally, they deck it off with pushing EOC to production, instead of taking the time to get it right first? I can very much see why there were people dissing it, and I'm NOT talking about the ones who weren't even involved in the beta. :ugeek:

 

As you can imagine, their following it up with crashing my character's setup on my last logout prior to EOC's release, added to a ton of other things, was simply the last straw. It took quite a lot to cause me to give up RuneScape, and I'll be glad I never start playing again. I simply would be out of my mind to ever start again. :mad:

 

 

<*walks out of the thread for now, slamming the door so hard that several nice portraits fall off the walls and smash so hard against the ground that they disintegrate on impact*>

 

 

~Mr. D. V. "You just hit a [bleep]ing nerve." Devnull

Not being able to equip a staff and Anti-Dragonfire shield at the same time wasn't a bug.

Sylpheed.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He didn't say it was a bug either ;)

 

They should have had elemental wands, though.

Basic lv 1 elemental wands, then some wand equivalent to battlestaves and the ability to upgrade those to mystic at that one npc.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I prefer to think it was the coming out of elite/high level gear (Overloads, Turmoil, Chaotics, Dclaws, Nex) EoC, Squel of Fortune combined.

 

One of the biggest offenders contributers elitist Runescape was the release of Dungeoneering(When I quited). Wrecked whip prices and promoted team play which eventually means exclusion for solo scapers. If you choose to solo dung you were limited to terrible xp  and tokens rates.

Instead of boss teams calling for

 

90 range/decent gear (karils) for Arma to 99 everything/arma/chaotic cbow.

 

AGS/bandos/99 str/att for Bandos to 99 everything, dclaws, overloads stuff and stuff.

 

If you I can recall the golden age of Runescape was when Godswords and whips were at the top of the food chain. Dragon claws from WGS was the beginning of the end.

 

Elitist RS was the coffin. EoC was the nails. Micro Transactions was the fancy grave plot. Bonus: Efficiency-scape is the wall outside the graveyard preventing new players from entering the game.

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you're going to go that far, you could probably bring up GWD as one of the bigger pieces of exclusionary content (and the beginning of the end for skilling)... Or the Fire Cape, for giving official support to the 'hardcore' players at the expense of more casual ones. Or any number of other updates, really. Much as I agree with what the issue is, this is probably in full effect for when it started.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why not skillcapes then? I think that wad the first step to "elite"

  • Like 1

Tranquil.png

 

[2:21:46 PM] Baldvin | Leik: these comp reqs are so bad

[2:22:36 PM] Arceus Dark: Time to get...req'd?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why not skillcapes then? I think that wad the first step to "elite"

Because skill capes don't really lock anyone out; yes they drove more people to get 99s but even if you are are awful at the game there is nothing to stop you getting a 99 - even the expensive or slow ones are perfectly doable by anyone given time.

 

When it comes to exclusionary type content it relates to things like GWD and Firecape because they take away a big part of the emphasis on skilling by suppling complete top end gear skill free, but aren't accessible to all as you have to be somewhat skilful with combat to get there. Plus it marked a tipping point where skilling stopped being worthwhile for money, as the new hard to get drop items were common enough to be a sustainable income, but rare enough to out strip the value of any skilling.

Firecape on the other hand marks the point at which people began being rewarded to be 'elite' players - only the best hardcore players could manage to get it (at the time) and for the first time in runescape history it, despite being the best cape in-game rather than just a cosmetic reward, was not open to more casual players as they just did not have the skills to beat the caves.


Plv6Dz6.jpg

Operation Gold Sparkles :: Chompy Kills ::  Full Profound :: Champions :: Barbarian Notes :: Champions Tackle Box :: MA Rewards

Dragonkin Journals :: Ports Stories :: Elder Chronicles :: Boss Slayer :: Penance King :: Kal'gerion Titles :: Gold Statue

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

...

 

It's been "dying" for a goddamn long time - and some of us are just sick of hearing the wild theories behind why. Here's the truth starting from 2005:

 

Nearly all MMO's have taken a hit. The next generation of players simply aren't patient enough for MMO's and play immediate gratification games like Meatboy or Angry Birds where levels are a few minutes long - not a few days of grinding.

 

There is more competition in "fast action" games like Battlefield or Call of Duty as well that give a "better thrill" than Runescape PvP. This isn't 2003~2006 where consoles still kinda sucked to play online with (PS2 was mostly racing games, Xbox live was shoddy)

 

The PS3 was released in late 2006. Xbox 360 was released in late 2005. The funny thing about RS's largest "downhill trend" was the new competition from the 360 and PS3 in 2006-2007 as the consoles started gaining a larger consumer base. Whenever a new major title is released for a console - Runescape takes a small hit in players for a week or two while everyone is playing those games.

 

There is simply a lot more competition resulting in less growth of a new playerbase. 

 

...

 

This. In a nutshell. The computer gaming world is a lot different now -- and all the MMORPG's have taken hits and lost a lot of of their player base. 

 

It's far more appealing for people to play fast-action player ready PVP console games than to go on the computer and play Runescape.  :P

  • Like 2

nyuseg.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's far more appealing for people to play fast-action player ready PVP console games than to go on the computer and play Runescape.  :P

 

I thought that too, until I started playing Marvel Heroes this past week :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

...

 

It's been "dying" for a goddamn long time - and some of us are just sick of hearing the wild theories behind why. Here's the truth starting from 2005:

 

Nearly all MMO's have taken a hit. The next generation of players simply aren't patient enough for MMO's and play immediate gratification games like Meatboy or Angry Birds where levels are a few minutes long - not a few days of grinding.

 

There is more competition in "fast action" games like Battlefield or Call of Duty as well that give a "better thrill" than Runescape PvP. This isn't 2003~2006 where consoles still kinda sucked to play online with (PS2 was mostly racing games, Xbox live was shoddy)

 

The PS3 was released in late 2006. Xbox 360 was released in late 2005. The funny thing about RS's largest "downhill trend" was the new competition from the 360 and PS3 in 2006-2007 as the consoles started gaining a larger consumer base. Whenever a new major title is released for a console - Runescape takes a small hit in players for a week or two while everyone is playing those games.

 

There is simply a lot more competition resulting in less growth of a new playerbase. 

 

...

 

This. In a nutshell. The computer gaming world is a lot different now -- and all the MMORPG's have taken hits and lost a lot of of their player base. 

 

It's far more appealing for people to play fast-action player ready PVP console games than to go on the computer and play Runescape.  :P

 

 

That's part of the picture, for sure, but not the only part. Runescape has certainly taken a far bigger hit than say WoW; and another part of the picture is the lackluster management of the game and things like that. They have definitely driven away players and made the game less friendly for new players.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

It's far more appealing for people to play fast-action player ready PVP console games than to go on the computer and play Runescape.  :P

 

I thought that too, until I started playing Marvel Heroes this past week :D

 

MOBA? I get the feeling that those are pretty much responsible for killing MMORPGs as a genre by virtue of having all of the MMO medium's strengths while being a game instead of a job

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd say no to the topic. Runescape was already slipping before EOC came out, but we see that more and ore players quit when it came out, and more did when RS3 came out. Legacy mode is a nice addition, but won't be enough to bring back the number of players there once was.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I quit around the time of EoC but I was already fed up with several aspects of the game.

EoC was just what tipped me to 100% done.

I still pop in every few months to see what's new. I've seen talk of tier weapons and armors, I'm out of the loop so I don't understand what anybody is saying. But really all it sounds like is an uphill grind, more work. And to that I say: Nope, I'll pass.

 

In the past, even on a hiatus I would log in to grab special holiday rewards, it was pretty much the only remaining link I kept with the game. But then they started making major holiday rewards members-only, and I was 100% done with that too. If they think I'll sub just to get a holiday reward, more like I'll never come back again, ever.

  • Like 1

2480+ total

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it was the combination of EoC and the ridiculous way they went about introducing MTX. One or the other would have been OK, but if you're going to destroy both the gameplay and any sense of achievement from playing, what's left really?

 

 

 

MOBA? I get the feeling that those are pretty much responsible for killing MMORPGs as a genre by virtue of having all of the MMO medium's strengths while being a game instead of a job

 

MOBAs have very little to do with MMOs and are more similar to an RTS-lite genre.


Asmodean <3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's true that EoC (while, in my view, improving combat in certain ways) drove away a lot of the older player base, and also the MTX were unfavorable amongst the older player base. But this doesn't really explain why Runescape has failed to grow, attracted new players or why F2P has lingered. After all, to newer players, EoC wouldn't be as bad as it was to the older players (since the new players don't really know what combat was like before EoC), and also, the pseudo-complexity of EoC is more similar to modern games on the market that these newer players might have encountered. So it's not exactly fair to blame EoC. As for MTX, again the older generation hates it, but they are quite prevalent in today's MMO market, and I doubt newer players would be as averse to them as older players, since they have probably seen it elsewhere.

 

I think the real explanation for the dwindling growth in new RS players has to do with the fact that the game has moved into a more hardcore direction (120/200Ms/Comp/Trims as opposed to 80's, 90's, or 99's). The game is extreme in the amount of time that it requires to get to 'respectable' milestones/achievements (120/200Ms) - and it is more or less akin to a part-time job now. This doesn't bother older players (myself included to a degree), because we are used to it, but I don't doubt that this is completely overwhelming to newer players: the notion that they'd have to be mega-billionaires or put in hundreds of hours to achieve even something mildly respectable (like a 120).

 

Basically the game is becoming more entrenched and more focused towards appealing to the tastes of hardcore players and veterans, and that has come at the cost of appealing to new players. Most of the 'fun' activities are dead and deserted, a sense of community has also eroded, there is little meaningful competition (unless you count the extreme manifestations that occur between the top highscore players, which more or less boil down to who has more money, spins, hours to no-life), and much of the game is focused towards an endless mind-numbing grind, the exp gainz, and even non-skill activities are designed to be grindy. A certain amount of instant gratification is necessary and even good. I can understand quite easily why this generation of gamers isn't drawn to MMORPGs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

MOBAs have very little to do with MMOs and are more similar to an RTS-lite genre.

It's mostly because League seems to be in the same position WoW was in eight years ago, as the stupidly popular game that brought a ton of attention to an otherwise niche genre (and unless I'm mistaken, spawned legions of imitators).

 

They seem more accessible without sacrificing that edge that appeals to hardcore players, at any rate.

 

I think the real explanation for the dwindling growth in new RS players has to do with the fact that the game has moved into a more hardcore direction (120/200Ms/Comp/Trims as opposed to 80's, 90's, or 99's). The game is extreme in the amount of time that it requires to get to 'respectable' milestones/achievements (120/200Ms) - and it is more or less akin to a part-time job now. This doesn't bother older players (myself included to a degree), because we are used to it, but I don't doubt that this is completely overwhelming to newer players: the notion that they'd have to be mega-billionaires or put in hundreds of hours to achieve even something mildly respectable (like a 120).
This might have more to do with us older players having a substantial headstart than us being 'used' to it, except now we're the only groups that ever get content. Divination might well be the best example of this sort of thing: the skill itself is awful in just about every way, but they pitched it as an 'old school' skill and put a lot of focus on the high score race during the prerelease period... A race that basically came down to whoever could put in the most uninterrupted time in a two week period at the beginning of the school/university semester. I don't know about any of you, but I basically lost my chance to participate within the first hour.
 
The part that gets me is that we can still get away with calling newer players lazy if they don't go along with it, or sort of smugly imply that we're better than the instant-gratification-crazed mainstream because we play this instead of CoD... but if I'm a new player, why would I want to spend all of my gaming time playing catch-up and probably still never be able to participate in the part of the game that 'matters'?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't blame new players for not wanting to 'work' towards these goals in this metagame. I think their aversion to this is perfectly rational and appropriate. They aren't being lazy, they are simply recognizing that the task put forth in front of them is ridiculous.

 

At least when the game was still about 80's, 90's, 99's, it was possible to play catch-up reasonably well. That's not quite the case anymore.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

New players don't really jump into RS and gun for 120s/200Ms straight away though.

  • Like 1

6Ij0n.jpg

In real life MMO you don't get 99 smithing by making endless bronze daggers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There's literally no reason to want to get 120 capes/200M skills other than the feeling of achievement.

I highly doubt somebody would start playing RS and be like "Oh man, I'm gonna have to get 104M or 200M exp in every skill, this would take forever! *quits*"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Last year I made a new account to see what things were like in EoC as a "new" player. I wrote about it here (don't bump). While I'm sure my post is now a bit dated (and I personally hope it is), it was sad how "difficult" the game is to figure out now as a new player. I remember how simple and intuitive the game was when I started playing in 2004.

 

When I did that experiment, the biggest obstacles as a new player were:

1. You had to have the optimal gear for your level to survive in combat against monsters close to your combat level. Training against such monsters isn't really even an option. You basically have to stick with goblins and cows forever instead of fighting monsters your level.

2. Nobody on the GE even sold the low level equipment you needed.

3. There were no guides anywhere on where/how to train.

 

Hopefully nowadays there's more information on low level training methods in addition to more low level equipment being traded on the GE. However, it wouldn't really surprise me if nothing's changed. After all, along with EoC came the extinction of pures. And without experienced players making new accounts, there's nobody to write guides on the best ways to train combat at low levels.

  • Like 1

77yLQy8.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Miniclip ruined Runescape.


 

[bleep] OFF HOW ARE U SO [bleep]ING LUCKY U PIECE OF [bleep]ING SHIT [bleep] [bleep] [wagon] MUNCHER

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Last year I made a new account to see what things were like in EoC as a "new" player. I wrote about it here (don't bump). While I'm sure my post is now a bit dated (and I personally hope it is), it was sad how "difficult" the game is to figure out now as a new player. I remember how simple and intuitive the game was when I started playing in 2004.

 

When I did that experiment, the biggest obstacles as a new player were:

1. You had to have the optimal gear for your level to survive in combat against monsters close to your combat level. Training against such monsters isn't really even an option. You basically have to stick with goblins and cows forever instead of fighting monsters your level.

2. Nobody on the GE even sold the low level equipment you needed.

3. There were no guides anywhere on where/how to train.

 

Hopefully nowadays there's more information on low level training methods in addition to more low level equipment being traded on the GE. However, it wouldn't really surprise me if nothing's changed. After all, along with EoC came the extinction of pures. And without experienced players making new accounts, there's nobody to write guides on the best ways to train combat at low levels.

Basically what I did on a noob acc was kill goblins repeatedly until 40~50 in melee stats.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

New players don't really jump into RS and gun for 120s/200Ms straight away though.

 

I agree, but at some point after joining, either through talking to people, interaction with the metagame/culture, perhaps the various announcements, twitch/youtube or whatever, they begin to wonder what the point of the game is, and they will get pushed into that direction.

 

Even back in the day, when real life people I knew contemplated about RS or were wondering what it was about, it was always an awkward conversation. "So what do you do in there? Chop logs or something?", they'd ask. To which someone would reply, "yeah, you get levels up, and then you get a cape.."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

New players don't really jump into RS and gun for 120s/200Ms straight away though.

 

I agree, but at some point after joining, either through talking to people, interaction with the metagame/culture, perhaps the various announcements, twitch/youtube or whatever, they begin to wonder what the point of the game is, and they will get pushed into that direction.

 

Even back in the day, when real life people I knew contemplated about RS or were wondering what it was about, it was always an awkward conversation. "So what do you do in there? Chop logs or something?", they'd ask. To which someone would reply, "yeah, you get levels up, and then you get a cape.."

 

Or you can take part in over 190 quests, fight boss monsters, or generally do whatever you want? :P

6Ij0n.jpg

In real life MMO you don't get 99 smithing by making endless bronze daggers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Or pvp


Tranquil.png

 

[2:21:46 PM] Baldvin | Leik: these comp reqs are so bad

[2:22:36 PM] Arceus Dark: Time to get...req'd?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just wanted to point out that complaints about Pay-To-Win and Freemium have gotten to a point where it's made it into The New York Times today. The article's focus is on microtransactions, but the final quote - which is from the CEO of Nexon, the maker of MapleStory, makes him sound a bit like he's pushing more than games: 

 

"The No. 1 job is not to monetize," Mr. Mahoney said. "It's to keep the user coming back for years or months on end."

 

I should add though that the article is pretty nuanced in how it frames the debate, which is mostly about conflict in the industry over various freemium models and their risks to gaming culture, like in this paragraph:

 

Defenders of the freemium model say criticism is driven by game developers and players who have an overly rigid view of how games should be made available. Even with all the opportunities to spend money inside free games, they say, a majority of players pay nothing.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.