BBCode Error: Spoiler Tag

[@Dan3HitU 19]

This works fine:

 

content

 

[spoiler]content[/spoiler]

This no longer works (it did yesterday)

[spoiler=give it a name]content

 

[spoiler=give it a name]content[/spoiler]

[jasignhagj 202]

Broken for my sig, although it seems to work in some old posts I have

[MageUK 79]

Should be fixed now. :)

[Saradomin_Mage 3562]

Are the tags [hide] [/hide] meant to be non-functional?

[MageUK 79]

Are the tags [hide] [/hide] meant to be non-functional?

You saw nothing.

[D. V. Devnull 125]

Are the tags [hide] [/hide] meant to be non-functional?

You saw nothing.

LOL :XD:

 

 

Should be fixed now. :)

I can point out one spot that there's still work to be done. :P

 

<*aims a finger at the "View Forum Rules" link above*>

 

It seems the Bullets got broke around the same time... Tripped over it by accident. :(

 

 

~D. V. "Who knows what else I'll trip over?" Devnull

[MageUK 79]

 

Are the tags [hide] [/hide] meant to be non-functional?

You saw nothing.

LOL :XD:

 

 

Should be fixed now. :)

I can point out one spot that there's still work to be done. :P

 

<*aims a finger at the "View Forum Rules" link above*>

 

It seems the Bullets got broke around the same time... Tripped over it by accident. :(

 

 

~D. V. "Who knows what else I'll trip over?" Devnull

 

Not sure what you mean?  Can you provide a screenshot?

[Saradomin_Mage 3562]

Getting an extra bullet on the subbullets (is that even the name):

 

[MageUK 79]

It seems the way those BBCodes are parsed slightly changed and having multiple lists inside an existing list element doesn't work so well any more. Getting rid of those extra points won't be particularly fun. No big deal, anyway.

[@Dan3HitU 19]

Thank you!

 

Can close this now =D

[D. V. Devnull 125]

It seems the way those BBCodes are parsed slightly changed and having multiple lists inside an existing list element doesn't work so well any more. Getting rid of those extra points won't be particularly fun. No big deal, anyway.

You might try using lettered lists or something to get around the issue, if that's even possible.  If I could see what the post source of that text looks like, it might be possible to debug & repair the post, and defeat the parsing changes. :-k

 

BTW, and please excuse my extreme curiosity, what caused things to change?  Are we loading part of these forums' core stuff from a remote location, or was the change just bonded into an update package that was loaded into the forums?  In the latter's case, I figure it happened such that nobody could know and only find out about side-effects later?

 

~D. V. "Do these original programmers think about edge cases anymore?" Devnull