I heard the review doesn't have any spoilers. You really shouldn't be furious at something you haven't read. Reviewing the book ahead of its official release date was a very rotten thing to do. IÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ã¢ââ¬Å¾Ã¢m surprised at The Times, greatly disappointed in that fact that they published the review, and believe that the reporter that published it should apologize to the author and the millions of disappointed fans. I didnÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ã¢ââ¬Å¾Ã¢t read the review on purpose - the fun is waiting for the book as the release date approaches, and it seems that The Times was eager to spoil the fun for everyone. The Times hasn't even apologized to J. K. Rowling. They could at least be decent enough to acknowledge and admit what they did was wrong.