Jump to content

trottle

Members
  • Posts

    72
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

0 Neutral

Profile Information

  • Location
    Netherlands
  1. I was interested in the urns, but yeah they are not very practical at all. The only ores i smelt in large numbers are gold ore....and the smelt urns dont work with gold bars (or am i doing something wrong) The wc ones dont work with ivy...although i might bring one on farm runs. The cook urns......really is there anybody who does not have 99 cook allready? The prayer urns are nice vs lessers or greaters, but the xp for the infernal ashes is high enough to bank them and save them for your house altar (or sell). You dont bring your bonecrusher to dragons either. The mining and fishing urns are not that bad tho, although the xp of the mining urn is really strange compared to the rest. and about the dying (or dead) content: its very hard to keep that in check i think. But yeah with some updates you really wonder if Jagex put any thought in it at all. The charm sprites are a good example, that was allready dead on the second day of release. I have used it a few times to get my strange rocks, but although the concept was not bad at all i just stopped doing it cause the charm rate was so annoyingly slow. If that was just a little bit better i would not even have mind the slow(ish) hunt xp.
  2. the second article is spot on!! ranging and maging is totally pointless above the first few floors. I got a tier 10 longbow with 125 tier 10 arrows and half way through one of those gluteanous beast (totally misspelled) boss fights i ran out of ammo!
  3. I can only complete seers and lumby. The others i need a few more lvls for 1 or 2 tasks. I find it a little bit too much about having/getting levels instead of achieving things. (yeah, i know, lvls are an achievement) But most things are a joke if you allready hapen to have the lvl. What i liked about the lower leveled diaries that they actually made you do stuff that was equally annoying to high and lower lvls. (like catching the rats) Anyway, not a bad update, but they could have been a little bit more creative when picking the tasks.
  4. @Ts_Stormrage Hey, i enjoyed your article (except the ranting bit) Was quite sceptical about runefest, but i never vented it, and i would not even have gone if they paid my flightticket. I just could not imagine it being fun or that i would enjoy being there (my age probably also has something to do with that) Anyway, like i said, i enjoyed your article, cause i still was curious about what it was all about. Your enthusiasm caught on and I was actually thinking: hmmm...maybe this was more fun then i thought until i came to the ranting bit. Now i dont feel insulted by it but it automatically takes the whole article down. and it changed my thoughts to : well if it really was that much fun, why would he bother ranting. I know a big part of the rs community are a bunch of whining morrons and that they can really drive you mad. But if you enjoyed it really that much, why care about what others think.
  5. Maybe I am asking a lot. But it hardly compensates for the vast majority of players who ask for nothing. Jagex are the ones who presented this as a "thank you" to customers. They have since done *nothing* consistent with that. They are charging a fortune for the event, which benefits them, not customers. They are excluding most people and not doing anything to include players who can't come. Certainly not a way to thank customers. The "secret venue" bullsquat only three months before the event is not only not a kind gesture to customers, it's flat out obnoxious. The flagstaff is even worse -- it's an overt slap in the face to everyone who can't go. Everything about this event says "Jagex is throwing Jagex a big party, and if you want to pay a small fortune they'll let you watch". If that's not the message the company wanted to send, then they should have taken an approach that actually puts customers first, not their own desires and interests. Furthermore.......they are actually giving everybody a slap in the face, because ..... 1. in a way they are introducing REAL life trade....pay 75 pounds and you get a flagstaf 2. They are breaking their own rules by having people meet up. We all know people who got muted for asking real life questions.
  6. You call 79 slay high? I do call lvl 78 slay high i do call it mediocre. and a level nobody was asking for. There is a lvl 75, 80, 83, 85 and now a 78........yet from lvl 90 to lvl 99 (about 60% of total xp) there is still nothing
  7. I would like to see some new High lvl slayer monsters. The road from 90 to 99 is just one big drag without anything new. These new monster dont really have to drop anything special, but should just add some much needed variety.
  8. yeah, you might wanna work on summoning... first work to get a terrorbird (lvl 56 i think) then bunyip (lvl 68) as both of these really make life much easier. also you can have a quick look through the new quests, there have been, not that the new ones are really good or usefull, but it will give you a good idea about whats new. And if you dont know them allready check out the penguin spy hunting.
  9. probably A although if you like cannoning maybe doing Sumona 1-9 and then Duradel every 10th task can be faster.
  10. I did a lot of controlled fighting between att 92 and 96 Att, and was actually surprised how fast it was.....well not really faster, but it felt like more steady progress. And about the whip...it still is the best training weapon in game.
  11. Nah, would be to overpowered. But talking about overpowered, perhaps we need a protect from special attacks, cause AGS specials are really peeing me off
  12. Already won the argument, so I can moan about whatever I want 8-) if you can remember what your argument actually is. :thumbsup:
  13. You mentioned the 'best training method', which IS armored zombies. So which is it? Do you agree with me that slayer is the best training method, or do you think that only speed matters and think that Armored Zombies is the best? Also, it's not my fault I couldn't understand your post - it was hard enough to work through the haze of spelling and grammar errors along with poor sentance structure. I suggest consulting these two books before attempting to make a point again in the future: [hide=] [/hide] lol, if you cant win an argument go moan about someone's spelling. You go and try being flawless in a foreign language. But am i now reading correctly that you are saying slayer is the best method even though you mentioned it sucked????
  14. What? Are you trying to say Armored Zombies is the best way to train? I love training slayer, and I don't get what training it has to do with eating the heaviest calorie food. :roll: Where did i mention armoured zombies?? And if you dont understand my little analogy that leaves even more doubts about your way of reasoning.
  15. compfreak, Well i suck at calculations, i dont give a xxxx about xp rates, and i am quite sure there is better xp to be gotten elsewhere. But your way of thinking is like standing in front of a luxury buffet with the finest food in the world, cooked by the best chefs............and then only taking the bit with the most callories. :thumbdown:
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.