Jump to content

Welcome to Rune Tips, the first ever RuneScape help site. We aim to offer skill guides, quest guides, maps, calculators, informative databases, tips, and much more to help you get the most from the Massive Online Adventure Game, RuneScape, by Jagex Ltd © 2009.

Report Ad

Welcome to Forum.Tip.It
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!



Member Since 07 Apr 2013
Offline Last Active May 01 2013 08:31 PM

#5389927 Tip.It Times - 7th April 2013

Posted by ThereIsHope on 07 April 2013 - 08:36 PM

In regards to Two 3 or Not 2 Three, I have a mixed opinion. I can understand comparing various game features and the end message of playing what you feel is best, but the delivery was a tad too cynical/abrasive. Referring to 2 and 3 as an 'inert work-simulator' and a 'pay-to-win pissing contest' from the outset doesn't cast a good light on the rest of the article to come, as it comes off as a kind of attack on both sides of the argument. Also, while the numerical system in the EOC does look intimidating at first, one can understand how attacking and defending work in numerical terms by simply studying it, as one would have to do to understand combat statistics in the previous version as well. And the values on armor and weapons, as well as abilities, are in no way 'misleading', but are simply more aligned along the combat triangle than before.

On The Sixth Age, I agree with the intrigue of the player his/herself being the driving force behind events, and I do wonder if Jagex will implement a system in which choices made in future quests have more impact on your continued journey than aesthetics or certain people not talking to you. I too am anticipating what is to come.