I like planning things out, but i don't treat my plans with any seriousness. If a plan fails to pan out, I'm typically pretty good about reacting and coming up with a new one on the spot. And I don't feel upset that the plan was a dud. That shit happens, no use dwelling up on it. I did well in math, but not that well. I didn't like it because, although I could understand the theories, I didn't get the feeling that they had any practical relevance. There was no real way I could apply once I got into the advanced maths. I didn't respect its importance. So i just didn't try all that much. You know Rachael you say that you're not a natural leader because you're bossy and shit, but some people would say that's exactly what makes people a natural leader. I could never be a leader because i don't take deadlines seriously. But you are able to whip people into action. That's much more important to a leader than having people like you. You may not want the responsibility but if you have it thrust upon you, I'm sure you could do alright. So, although you have "lots of interest in other people's innermost thoughts and feelings.. especially those who I like", but are you interested in them on an emotional level, or a merely scientific, analytical level? So, INTJ may not be who youa re, but it seems like its not far off. Something else to consider is that these tests are just inherently inaccurate to a certain degree. You may also have thought about the answers for too long before putting them in. If you think about it too much, you could mess up the results and skew the test in one way or the other.