Jump to content

Hannibal

Members
  • Posts

    751
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Hannibal

  1. I don't think I'll buy anymore MS office suite products anymore, next time I need an upgrade, it'll be Open Office for me :)
    Man I wish I had a gig of memory :(
    We're getting a bit offtopic, but ah well :)

     

    openoffice.org[/url]":2i0vaeeg]System Requirements for OpenOffice.org 2.0

     

    Microsoft Windows

     

    * Windows 98, Windows ME, Windows 2000 (Service Pack 2 or higher), Windows XP, Windows 2003

     

    * 128 Mbytes RAM

     

    * 200 Mbytes available disk space

    :?:

     

     

     

    Have you tried running it with even 256mb RAM? :P

     

     

     

    Runs fine on my laptop which runs 384MB RAM. It also runs Ubuntu Linux, that might make the difference. :P

  2. Wait, where is Web 2.0? Need-more-buzzwords keyword please? This is the new millenium, you want to be learning Ruby on Rails, or Python, or JavaScript. Perl if you must, C is always handy, but stay away from Java and PHP because they'll be more dead than Latin before you can say "taxonomy" 3 times in a row without breaking your tongue. Welcome to the new web, where a site without Ajax, Fitt's law and a spiffy new declarative XML framework (OpenLaszlo, Backbase, Javeline, Google Webkit, etc.) is a LOSER! You don't know XSLT? Wait, how did you get that job again?

     

     

     

    --

     

    Disclaimer: There was only a tiny bit of sarcasm in the above. And in this, for that matter.

  3. Digital Fortress

     

    We follow Susan Fletcher as she attempts to break a code that a NASA code-breaking machine couldn't crack. She manages to solve this remarkably quickly.

     

     

     

    Umm... so... do you always misspell NSA as NASA? Never mind the fact that you misunderstood the entire book, from what I can tell (or just didn't actually read it). The spoiler someone else in this topic gave was much better than yours (albeit not entirely accurate either, at least it wasn't as skewed as this). And GhostRanger is right - the books are written in accessible English, it's not Brown's fault that someone happened to think they were good enough to be published, and then lots of people decided they were good enough to read.

     

     

     

    The impact of the Da Vinci Code has been much larger than the facts underlying it deserve (very few of them are actually facts), but that doesn't change the fact that it's thought to be an entertaining read by lots of people. I don't see how that is any reason to hate it. The fuss the church AND the atheist fanatics going "see! see!" are making is way over the top, but that's media and extremists for you.

  4. Um correct me if this is wrong, but I noticed that Runescape has severe disparities in terms of operating systems and platforms it runs on, even though Java is supposedly the standard in cross-platform development. For example, my intel box runs runescape at roughly 110 FPS on windows, but drops to 25 FPS on linux (both on high detail, on the same machine). On my Powerbook, however, the performance on high detail is so bad that it usually goes at 0.33 FPS (1 frame every 3 seconds) in "crowded" areas (e.g. world 1 varrock square) and roughly 15 FPS when I'm alone, in high detail. Interestingly, after a while of loading RS on high detail, Java crashes on Mac for no reason whatsoever (it usually happens when the extra files are at 97% of loading). This has severely degraded my experience on the game as I am forced to play on Low Detail despite having 1.25 GB of RAM and a 1.25 GHz PPC G4. I have absolutely no idea as to the cause of the random crashage of Java on mac when loading High Detail. Is there anyone who can offer a plausible explanation? I'm considering dual-booting FC4/SuSE just to play Runescape on High Detail.

     

     

     

     

     

    I'd be ready to describe you as being insane for wanting to run anything other than Mac OS on a Mac... Anyway.

     

    On Linux, check how 'nice' the java process is being (priorities and such). You should be able to get a slightly better performance that way. You might also be able to do the same on Mac, I'm not sure. Have you tried using different browsers on Mac? (Safari, Camino, iCab, Firefox, etc.)

  5. I doubt many of the folks in here are perl junkies. Doesn't mean they're not out there, just that there won't be many of them around here. I'm not too good at perl, and besides, haven't played RS for... 2 years now. So it's not so useful to me - but I don't doubt there will be people who appreciate it in due time :-)

  6. Hrm, I don't entirely agree with your definition of Kantianism though... Kant wrote that you should always do the thing which, by inference, you would want to become a universal law. For example, if you are faced with the decision to lie or speak the truth, you would speak the truth because you'd want it to be a universal law that everybody would always speak the truth, and you would definitely not want it to be a universal law that everybody was always free to lie when they wanted to.

     

     

     

    According to wikipedia: "Act as if the maxim of thy action were to become by thy will a universal law of nature."

  7. How's the CSS and PNG support though :P

     

     

     

     

     

    And I do laugh at FireFox throwing out a 'this xml document has no styling applied to it' msg for RSS feeds :P

     

    Manually adding ftl.

     

     

     

    Maybe you can make an extension for it?

     

     

     

    There are dozens already, and they actually tried adding it in time for Firefox 1.5 but failed because there were too many problems with it (memory leaks and whatnot - they tried integrating an existing extension). Either way, it will be in Firefox 2 (Ben Goodger just blogged about it).

     

     

     

    Transparent PNG support mostly works. It's not entirely up to the level of some other browsers, I think, but it's better than IE6 and should handle your average transparent PNG's okay. They fixed some css bugs, but by far not all of them.

  8. So, I got a pcmcia card for my linux laptop. I got one with an Atheros-G chipset. There are good drivers for this card under Linux (http://www.madwifi.org), and I would really recommend the chipset - it's been able to do everything I've asked from it for now, including logging in on heavily secured wireless on my university for which special software was required. So yeah.

  9. So. In Iran, a few homosexual people were hung (as in, killed by being hung) in public, in a football stadium to be precise. Suppose there were 10000 people present and just 5 murdered that way. These 10000 people had a brilliant time, popcorn and everything. Does that make it morally right to sacrifice those five lives for the entertainment of thousands?

     

     

     

    Another example. Suppose you are a doctor in a hospital. There are two patients you can choose to help, but due to time constraints you can only help one. The first patient lives alone, looks repulsive, does repulsive things, has no job, and is generally not a very well-accepted member of society. He has no friends or relatives. The other patient is the opposite of that - he's married, has children, lots of friends, and organizes fairs to help the poor in the neighbourhood and such. Now, suppose you have to operate on both of these men. For the repulsive, single man, you have a 99% chance of saving his life. For the family man, you have a 1% chance of saving his life. If you don't operate on one of them, they face certain death. What do you pick?

     

     

     

    Utilitarianism makes these questions hard, while if you would consider any human life valuable, the decision would be obvious.

  10. The code seems very inefficient though. You loop over each square 9 times...

     

     

     

    A more efficient way would be to use lists and splice those, but I don't know how easy that is in C++. Another way would be to have a fixed number 9! (which happens to be 3628800) and divide by the number in each field. In the end you should have 1 remaining, and if you don't, something is wrong :) . You would need to take care to catch errors or allow for floating point numbers in the variable though (so not just integers), or the division screws up if it goes bad :)

  11. IQ is such a biased measurement utility anyway. Though I guess internet tests fall in the most idiotic category of them, even official tests are highly influenced by culture and education - in other words, they don't really give you any idea how 'intelligent' someone is, as in brain capacity or whatever. They just tell you how well someone is able to make a test like that.

  12. I always yum'd for updates. But see, that's just an example of how things vary from distro to distro - some are RPM, some aren't. And the other thing that's annoying about Linux is that when you get a single RPM, it has dependencies on like three other packages that are missing or out of date. So when you try to get those packages the packages that are required by that one are out of date or missing, and so on and so forth.

     

    APT (Debian's package management thing, also on Ubuntu and I think on Fedora as well) takes care of dependencies. It's brilliant, really :-)

  13. But either way Linux is so impossibly varying and nonstandard that it's very hard to keep it up to date and compatible.

     

    apt-get upgrade

     

     

     

    The thing about Windows is that it's less flexible then Linux but on the upshot is more standardized. This is why people can more easily develop games for it, whereas no two distros (or even installations I'd say) of Linux are alike.

     

    And whereas you need two reboots to install a game that requires a new version of directX, and possibly another to get a better driver for your graphics card, most package managers on Linux do all of that for you, automatically, without a restart.

     

     

     

    Such problems with compatibilty would be a nightmare for tech support. As such I'd have to say that Mac would port their OS to run on x86-compatible computers rather than just Macs, and everyone would keep their hardware. This would make the most sense economically.

     

    True. Macs are easier to use for your average Grandma too, so they'd probably get to the market before someone has finally managed to create a usable version of Linux. Like, newb-usable.

  14. For web programming I like Perl and javascript. For ActiveX programming I like Microsoft Visual C++ or Visual Basic. For application programming I like C++ or java. For cross-platform programming I like java. For shell programming I like the Bourne or Bash shell.

     

     

     

    Did you just say you liked Java?

     

     

     

    :|

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.