TrueBeaver
-
Posts
171 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by TrueBeaver
-
-
Full Out
SST vs. Downfall
Chivalry Legions vs. Dragonwood
Natural Born Killers vs. Runite Knights of Finland
RuneScape Dinasty vs. Wilderland Luso Brazilian Clan
Crimson Raiders vs. Forsaken
Pure Hatred vs. Elite Assassins
Goldr Titans vs. The Titans
Red Blade Hunters vs. Final Ownage Elite -- olawd. should be fun
Sorrow of Knights vs. Apocalypse Slayers
Rune Raiders vs. The Brazilian Kings
Violent Resolution vs. Titans Revolution
Reign of Terror vs. Austrailian Army
Poison vs. Divine Forces
Way of War vs. Brutality
20v20
Thunder in the Sky vs. Crimson Raiders
True 0wnage vs. TRWF
Red Blade Hunters vs. Natural Born Killers -- Should be an awesome match.
The Titans vs. Sorrow of Knights
Cheer Up vs. The Rising
Ascension vs. Wilderland
Chivalry Legions vs. Dutch Generation
Australian Army vs. Elite Assassins
A lot of good match ups, good luck everyone.
-
Congrats on your win CR, impressive to say the least :thumbup:
-
After having a no-show last night we massed up stoked for our first Jagex Cup war. We pulled a lot less than we expected but were confident we could win even if we were outnumbered. As we were getting ready to hop to the war world I realized I was still on ancients and raged but didn't tell anyone because they're all slack jawed phaggots that would make fun of me :sad: . So before the war even started we were down a binder. On the war world we saw their pile only had 17 people which gave us a large confidence boost. We got the challenge and got ready to do work.
RBH Starting: 17 after kicking some foreigner named papibaklgraf from our friend chat
BP Starting: 17
We met in the middle and engaged in battle. I silently raged as our binds slacked but we had sufficient KO power to compensate. We kept it close to start out with despite having two piles bail far, far out of bounds (same person both times). Then when it was 14-14 we ripped through their pile with transitions taking it down to 14-11 and all but securing the win. As we piled their second to last binder, I was sent to go snipe their last one and we cruised to a 12-0 victory.
Shoutouts:
A3f for tribriding like a hero
Dog--blue and Paul for tanking us to victory
Rob for being the only one to spam "For liquor and [bleep]" with me.
-
Amusing to see a clan called United Skillers in the Jagex Cup.
Hello dear Jagex, clans and associates,I've come to understanding that my clan, 'United Skillers' has applied for the Jagex Clan Cup.
However, I have not approved such a decision and as such would like to request our declination from the Jagex Clan Cup.
I believe one of my admins or my Deputy Owner applied for us. As much as I appreciate such an action of independance, all big decisions, like this one, go through me first. Since that hasn't happened I am somehow frustrated.
In any case, consider this thread our withdrawal from the Cup, even though we NEVER internally applied. I thought the Clan Owner was the only person who would be able to apply on behalf of their clan? Perhaps I was wrong.
Ja Ne
Ranniks
Owner United Skillers
At least someone in that clan has a sense of humor (whoever signed up United Skillers for a Combat Cup).
QFC: 281-282-73-63060299
-
RBH #1?
20v20:
Ancient Fury vs. Thunder in the Sky
Ascension vs. Metal Massive Attack
Bigger Pkers vs. Red Blade Hunters (no homer :lol: )
Cheer Up vs. Forsaken
Crimson Raiders vs. Clan Envy
The Titans vs. Monocromatic Brazil
Cerulean Xeric vs. Elite Assassins
Wilderland Luso Brazilian Clan vs. The Knights of Order
Chivalry Legions vs. Downfall
Pure Hatred vs. Austrailian Army
Kirstunael vs. Sorrow of Knights
Natural Born Killers vs. Wicked Fury
Corrupted Vengeance vs. The Rising
The RuneScape Warhungers Federation vs. The' Clan
Dragonwood vs. Dutch Generation
True 0wnage vs. Rune Raiders
A lot of good matchups in the 20v20
Regular
Way of War vs. The Hicks
LORDS VII vs. Crimson Raiders
Austrailian Army vs. The Dark Syndicates
The F2P Way vs. RuneScape Dinasty
Runite Knights of Finland vs. Forces of Poland
'The' Clan vs. Divine Forces
Violent Resolution vs. Espartan
The Knights of Order vs. Titans Revolution
Alpha Skills Core vs. The Brazilian Kings
Golden Elites vs. Poison
Reign of Terror vs. Ascension
The Titans vs. The Gladiatorz
The Call of Legends vs. Chivalry Legions
Forsaken vs. Rogue Ninja Civilization
Sorrow of Knights vs. Bacon Infinity
Neitiznot & Jatizso POC vs. Brutality
United Skillers vs. Rune Raiders
Temple Angel Knights vs. Rogues Legion
Pure Hatred vs. Legendz
Final Ownage Elite vs. Devil's Rejects
Singapore vs. Red Blade Hunters (I wish :unsure: )
Mephistopheles vs. Elite Assassins
Wilderland Luso Brazilian Clan vs. Northern Allies
The Legend of Zelda vs. SST
TheDark Knights vs. True Ownage
Dragonwood vs. Eternal Brethren
Bloodlines vs. Apocalypse Slayers
Natural Born Killers vs. Shadows Bane
Lords of Death vs. Monocromatic Brazil
White Knights of W31 vs. Goldr Titans
The Rising vs. Downfall
Didn't bother looking up all those clans so yeah.
-
-
Or, you know, it could because foreign aid is a fallacious means of "charity". And that the other members of NATO don't fulfill their obligations so we must match their inadequacies.
Or, you know, it could be that Americans think America's budget spends 27% on foreign aid: Source
Yes, those damned Europeans! Spending their money on things like college, health care, child care and assistance to the poor! Why can't they be real men and spend money on guns and bullets like us!
In fact the current US Military force is the "weakest" it has been since World War Two. SourceLol, what a bs argument. So because fewer percent of the population is participating in the armed forces -- which is because we don't have a draft, we have a growing population, infant mortality is going down thus we have higher longevity, etc -- that means we're spending less on the military than ever before? We're spending more on the military now than at any point in time in pure physical dollars, and we're not fighting wars of self-defense but wars of aggression and imperialism. Spending more than the entire world combined isn't enough for you?
Further, wouldn't George W. Bush's AIDS program be better for the continent of Africa than some subsidies here and there? SourceThat source doesn't say that the program is better than ending farm subsidies. It just says that Bush's AIDS program was better and more funded than Obama's. So either find a new source, or make a different argument...like, "Bush's AIDS program was better for Africa than Obama's." I find this arguable. I do not find it arguable that Bush's foreign aid program was better by the simple fact that Obama removed the Gag Rule, and isn't promoting abstinence. However, both are failures on terms of foreign aid because of local politicians in the Dakotas and Midwest who never want agricultural subsidies cut. These keep food prices artificially low and African farmers cannot compete. But I guess in your zeal for partisanship for quite possibly the worst president in recent memory, you had to find and exploit his one good spot: his AIDS program.
edit: LOL! Look what I found this morning on my feed when I woke up: U.S. trucking contracts funded Taliban, source says
Can we leave Afghanistan and Iraq now?
My apologies, I posted that while incredibly drunk and I don't even know what I'm talking about part of the time l0l.
I agree that we can easily cut down on defense spending, for example by closing foreign bases, but significant cuts are not wise nor pragmatic. I posted on another topic the breakdown of our defense spending and there's maybe 15% maximum, which includes R&D which arguably increases GDP multiple times over what we spend on it. But aid will not solve any problems in Africa.
You're right in pointing out that there are additional factors that cause our military strength as percent of population to be low, but then you go on about "pure physical dollars" which are likewise a result of inflation. Also, wars of imperialism? Please.
Don't know what caused me to post that link about the AIDS program, to be honest, but I agree with you that we should stop subsidies. My "zeal for partisanship"? Laughable.
Again, I apologize for not making any sense.
-
Taxing and welfare is not the solution here. As I said before, super-corporations need to be forced to use domestic labor. It's ridiculous how they can abuse, bribe, and sue their way out of taxes and use USA's military and finacial protection, yet not use their people.
I might sound like a commie, but the goal is the same as any Tea Party member wants: a stronger economic America.
Why should we force corporations to use domestic labor if foreign labor is more viable?
As an outside observer with no particular knowledge of the US budget, I've never understood why the US spends so much of its GDP on defence.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8y06NSBBRtY
It's because the Pentagon is essentially another arm of government. A few other reasons:
1.) War is profitable for private businesses, and because we elect individuals rather than parties, it's more expensive to run a campaign in America. This leads to dependence on a lot of funds to continue to win reelection.
2.) The MIC placed its tentacles in every single Congressional District. So if you cut a piece of military spending, you're potentially removing jobs from that part of America. A major part of our economy is built around war.
3.) Once the Cold War ended, its power was so strong that it was unlikely to go anywhere and needed new enemies; dictators in the ME and terrorism continue to give itself fuel.
4.) High level of respect among Americans for military. Not only do Americans not think the military is too powerful, they think it should be more powerful than it already is:
This means that no matter what people say about defense spending or the deficit, it will in practice be extremely difficult for mere politicians to ever win an argument with generals and admirals.
Oh, and Americans do not care about "perspective" or starving people in Africa. Every poll shows Americans' ignorance about our budget, and that the one thing they want to cut more than anything else is foreign aid
http://www.gallup.com/poll/145790/americans-oppose-cuts-education-social-security-defense.aspx
It's not about perspective, it's about Heritage's desire for lower taxes on rich people. End of story. We'd give more aid to Africa if I had my way (and end agriculture subsidies, which contribute far more to African poverty than anything they do on their own); in fact, I was planning to join the Peace Corps after graduation but was forced out due to budget cuts.
Or, you know, it could because foreign aid is a fallacious means of "charity". And that the other members of NATO don't fulfill their obligations so we must match their inadequacies.
In fact the current US Military force is the "weakest" it has been since World War Two. Source
Further, wouldn't George W. Bush's AIDS program be better for the continent of Africa than some subsidies here and there? Source
Your insistence to not discuss other areas of US domestic spending adds doubt as to whether you oppose the proportion of GDP that is spent on welfare, or simply oppose welfare full stop.
What I don't understand is why no one can be bothered to create a different thread to discuss the U.S.'s military budget.
Imagine you create a thread about chocolate, and how you'd like to debate whether tootsie rolls can be considered chocolate or not. Then, your opponent starts to argue that tootsie rolls are chocolate, and that your position on the inclusion of marshmallows in the list of gummy candies is absolutely wrong, and it makes your argument on chocolate less valid.
I'm not discussing the U.S. military budget here because it has very little to do with the Census Bureau's definition of poverty, or the way the U.S. gives aid to people. If you want to discuss the U.S.'s military budget, I suggest you create a different thread instead of mucking this one up.
You make statements that you are against taking from the rich to help the poor but you support taking from the rich to pay for a military.
In my opinion the military itself is a welfare program, thus I personally agree with anyone saying it is relevant to this thread
Source:
I don't see how the small business owner in Iowa benefits when the U.S. government robs him of 40% of what his company earns in a year, and redirects it to the unemployed people in California so they have extra money to buy "medical" marijuana for their "disability".
tl;dr: republicans hate any government spending that isnt for god (you know the republicans goal of making a Christian version of Shariah law for America) and guns (military so we can "liberate" moar countries and doesnt afraid of anything). Of course I agreed with the general thing you started this thread with however you are among the many hypocrites who preach this so I dislike the person saying this not the central point.
Libertarianism is better. They agree with the "tea partiers" on economic points but also are for individual freedom like abortion rights, ending drug prohibition, etc.
I must admit, I laughed. Surely you don't think all, or most, Republican policies are for religion and that we allow citizens to bear arms to liberate other countries? If you do, I insist you excuse me from considering your opinion on related policies relevant. I am interested, however, in how the right for me to own a handgun is relevant to people much braver and more virtuous than I serving in Iraq or Afghanistan or how fiscal discipline is related to any Christian text.
-
Nice job CR :thumbsup:
Gotta love the oldschool box by PH tho
-
Thanks for the fight, I enjoyed it.
-
Grats Poison, not much they could do outnumbered like that but still an impressive victory.
-
I think that's fair. Hopefully we can have a rematch sometime that's cleaner.
-
Ignoring the whole facts about the third round....
You still fought with 4 members not on your memberlist.
[08:12:29] <@MEGAJAYSON> .clan viz
[08:12:31] -[uT]RuneScript- *** [ CLAN ]: Viz is in Bloodshed Empire and Team Bloodshed. | URL: http://runehead.com/....php?search=viz
[08:26:13] <@MEGAJAYSON> .clan ix dclaw xi
[08:26:15] -[uT]RuneScript- *** [ CLAN ]: Ix Dclaw Xi was not found in the RSHSC.
[13:09:41] <@MEGAJAYSON> .clan iFlame
[13:09:43] -[uT]RuneScript- *** [ CLAN ]: Iflame was not found in the RSHSC.
[13:08:51] <@MEGAJAYSON> .clan ur enemy1354
[13:08:53] -[uT]RuneScript- *** [ CLAN ]: Ur Enemy1354 was not found in the RSHSC.
But whatever, you guys have annoyed me enough.
We know we won, even when you guys didn't cut first cut (Started 14-15), rushed our fall in while we were walking down and brought members not on your memberlist.
Memberlist at time of war can be found at the following two links.
Ur Enemy has been RBH for like 4 years, he should be on the retired memberlist since he's an inactive phaggot. Not sure why he isn't. Same thing with iflame, except even longer than Enemy. He ragequits and rejoins so often there was probably a mix-up with the memberlist for him.
Dclaw is the account of someone in RBH but apparently it isn't on the memberlist and it was his brother on it, so we kicked him from friend chat after finding out. That account didn't war either round.
Viz is a longtime friend of ours and attends lots of our events so I, and probably others, didn't even think anything of it when he was there. I apologize for that, must've thought that round 2 was friends-allowed rather than just round 3. Although, I doubt his presence would've had much of an impact considering...
Your turn:
[sun 12 - 23:11:41] @TrueBeaver : .clan ka t
[sun 12 - 23:11:42] • [Notice-Private] [DA]RuneScript ([email protected]) : *** [ CLAN ]: Ka T was not found in the RSHSC.
[sun 12 - 23:12:21] @TrueBeaver : .clan lemantation
[sun 12 - 23:12:23] • [Notice-Private] [DA]RuneScript ([email protected]) : *** [ CLAN ]: Lemantation is in 3 clans. First 2 clans: All WG ever 2, Destiny | URL: http://runehead.com/clans/search.php?search=lemantation
[sun 12 - 23:14:41] @TrueBeaver : .clan joey sh0tz
[sun 12 - 23:14:42] • [Notice-Private] [DA]RuneScript ([email protected]) : *** [ CLAN ]: Joey Sh0tz was not found in the RSHSC.
Lemantation looks like their old clan might be slow removing them or something, although I find that difficult to believe since they have High Council rank. Maybe it's a team? Not sure.
Third round was agreed to NOT be a tiebreaker. It has no bearing on the fight. We have logs from both sides saying that. You had 15 people when the timer ran out so that's what we matched.
edit: you explained on RSC.
-
Grats True Ownage, looks like a pretty solid victory especially coming back.
-
Ending Round 1:
WG: 8
RBH: 0
Taken from their RSC post. I can verify if needed.
Confirmed on my video.
-
Good fight WG, I enjoyed it. Your rangers did work round 1 :thumbsup:
I hope this topic doesn't explode like RSC did.
Shoutouts:
-Paul's dog. RIP :(
-Samich for not dying round 2
-Ogo for being a [bleep]
-Red x for ddosing my house causing me to miss round 3
-
Nice work Legendz. Strong spam.
-
brb posting the same thing as everyone else has
If it's the leadership reopening, good. If it's some members, I'd advise against it.
I would probably join an RBH remake if it was us ranks reopening it.
Yes, I've also seen a lot fail.
Best of luck to RR and Exer, I'm glad to see some old school clans are coming back.
-
Looking to join this clan, i cannot register on your forums
What seems to be the problem? Is it the security question? If so, I believe we got rid of that yesterday because several people were having trouble.
-
Good luck. Heard quite a lot about you, but seeing some wars from you guys will still be interesting. Looking forward to it. :thumbup:
Only good things I hope :shades:
-
I'm always less active during the summer. During the school year I'm always on but during winter/summer breaks I travel and visit family+friends.
(age: 20)
-
Let's do this!
We nh distract during wars, watch out TWR
-
Vs
Today (Sunday, June 5th) at 4 pm est, 9 pm gmt our Warlord Sk8erpunk massed the Valiant troops of the Red Blade Hunters to have a 2 round war versus The Brazilian Knights.
The Rules that were set are as follows:
Round 1 rules:
Matched opts
Cwa classic
Center bounds
Melee, Binds, Range allowed
Dung off
Corrupt off
1 sniper cap
Rings on
North attacks
Round 2 rules:
Run in war, 30 minutes.
Turrets arena
Range, Binds, Melee on
Dung off
Corrupt off
Rings on
1 sniper cap
Attack on sight
Round 1:
We pulled 20 to their 21 so they dropped one, i didnt get many pics of this round so one of our members will upload a vid that they took asap.
One of their members broke bounds at the end but we didnt mind
This round ended 17 - 1 to us and we were very confident for round 2 having only lost 3 members matched.
[/color]Round 2:
For round 2 we again pulled 20 to their 21 and once we got the ball rolling we never looked back, due to some good binds (Shout out to A3f for being #1 binder) and good transitions from our callers we were able to rip through their fall ins and gain an unassailable lead.
We ended on 55 kills to their 28.
Overall great performance by all Rbh shout outs to Sk8 for epic calling and A3f as stated earlier for epic binding more of the same rbh and we will have a great summer 2011.
Keep up the good work boys and samich
Thanks for the fight, BK.
1k that I saw, 0d combined. Piled once. Tbh not much they could do with the level disparity.
FU A3f for beating me by 4 binds.
Round 2 vid will be up soon.
-
Let me know if you see something wrong with this:
You walk into a stranger's home, they try to kick you out, you point a gun at them, and then proceed to beat them repeatedly. Then, you tell them "Jeez, OK! You can stay in the kitchen if you want", and wonder why they are mad even though you are generous enough to let them have the kitchen all for themselves. Of course, those [bleep]ing bastards only use the kitchen to take the knives from there and try to attack you. That's really rude of them, right?
That's pretty much what Israel did to Palestine, and why Palestine isn't going to settle down until they get all of their lands back.
But we already had this argument many times before and explained in a more serious manner, so I don't think you're gonna listen this time.
To "make peace" in Gaza means that Gaza is all they get. Because seriously, if they "make peace" then Israel isn't even gonna bother giving them more land.
What makes it Palestinian land? Israel won it in an armed conflict and even gave back the vast majority of 'occupied' land in a peace treaty.
So if Palestine invaded Israel, displaced nearly all Israelis, made them second class citizens, and violated the human rights of said Israelis in the process, it becomes Palestinian land, right? (Just clarifying)
Well, yeah. It doesn't excuse any human rights violations, but yes it would be Palestinian land.
New community leader
in Clan Discussions
Posted
A good promotion in my eyes :thumbsup: