[Tip.It Times Presents: An Ethical Dilemma]

By removing the article, Tip It backed down from it's stance regarding current issues. No offense, but that is really wussy. I suggest rewriting the previous article to make it more fair but Tip It should NOT totally remove the previous article.

 

 

 

I suggest writing a new article to address separate issues:

 

 

 

1 - the community is worried over the recent bans for multi log considering many people play with their rl friends or family

 

 

 

2 - black marks/ bans for "advertising" is also widely perceived as unfair especially if only harmless fan pages are mentioned

 

 

 

3 - banning chars with inappropriate names is problematic and Jagex policy is unclear to players as some players with inappropriate names are banned but not all, which seems pretty unfair

 

 

 

In the original article "biased" wasn't used correctly. :P The word is unfair or unjust.

 

 

 

Exactly, im P****ed off of having to be scared of asking my mate wat his "msm" is or telling some one wat my clan site is. Its completly out of control.

 

 

 

 

 

Props to both of you. Very good points.

[Tip.It Times Presents: An Ethical Dilemma]

Exactly. I'm dyin with laughter here that they would actually provide a forum topic to discuss this in. It's hilarious.

 

 

 

Although I don't in any way, shape, or form agree with Tipit or Runescape in this matter, I feel all opinions (or at least most) have been shared, so no loss in letting it die. Everyone knows what everone else thinks now anyway.

 

 

 

(And yes, I did actually read the article.)

[Tip.It Times Presents: An Ethical Dilemma]

I've said it before and I'll say it again.

 

 

 

"If any man disagrees on the opinion of another, it is well within his right to state his own. But we can not censor his [the Editor's] opinion just because we don't like it. I myself perfectly agree with him. But if YOU don't, write your own opinion. Tell him how he is wrong. But add, don't detract. By just retracting his statement, Tipit is effectively stating that they have no confidence in the Editor's ability to do the job they themselves assigned to him. "

 

 

 

 

 

In light of the author for this week's article, I feel the statement in bold is sadly true. A sorrowful farewell to our Editor. His words live on.

 

 

 

 

 

And in response to this---->"This topic is for discussing the CURRENT article, NOT for re-hashing old arguments about whether Jagex was justified or not in banning certain players.

 

 

 

Please stick to the topic, or it will be locked."

 

 

 

 

 

Was not the new article a response to the old? If you really don't want people to talk about the old article, don't provide a place to do it in. If you just want to explain something, don't let us discuss it. Because you'll just find that you don't like what we say. Cause the truth hurts, don't it?

 

 

 

 

 

While yes, it's a good thing to be nice to everyone, and yes, making Andrew mad isn't our goal, I know for certain that Knowledge is Power.

 

 

 

And if I may reiterate:

 

 

 

"If any man disagrees on the opinion of another, it is well within his right to state his own."

 

 

 

Write a counter-arguement. But don't dismiss him as an ignorant fool. You make yourself look even worse.

[Tip.It Times Presents: The Greed Factor]

I like how The Editor used Runecrafting as a way to make money. That's how I'm currently supporting myself.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I as well feel runecrafting to be the most profitable skill in runescape. It has its costs (such as getting pked and having to have lots of glories), but I am in no way complaining. Runecrafting is a solid way of making cash. At higher levels, one can even make his own death runes, a fact I exploit daily in game. With level 75, and thus the giant pouch, soon to be mine, I am highly motivated to work ever-harder for my goal.