RSOF...AGAIN!

[SnWRifleman]

Why are the mods there so effin gay. They piss the hell out of me. They act mature but when I type one thing on there, they piss their pants and lock the [cabbage] up.

 

 

 

Here's the story.

 

 

 

I, out of the blue, decide to check back onto the RS site to check out the new updates since I've been on my leave for a couple of days.

 

Headstory of the site: RANT FORUM IZ BAKKK.

 

 

 

I was like oh hell naw...

 

 

 

Anyways. I decide to see what the mindless baboons of the RSOF were saying. To my dismay, the first page was filled with spam. So I check out one and someone decided to report a glitch. I make a sort of humorous, joking comment. His problem was that his inventory was getting filled with steel meds. So I decide to just say, "Maybe you got hacked and someone put steel meds into your inventory every night while you slept to make you psycho."

 

 

 

2 minutes later.

 

*Click onto a new post*

 

*****MESSAGE: YOU HAVE BEEN BANNED TEMPORARILY FROM THE RSOF*******.

 

 

 

When I saw that, I was like WTF...

 

 

 

SHORT V. OF THE STORY:

 

 

 

I get on the RSOF for 5 minutes and get banned from one humorous comment.

 

 

 

My question is. Why? Why do they care about such little joking comments to the point where the moderators will just ban you??? I did no crime, yet I was punished for a small little comment that had no harm intended or done. Seriously, I get banned in 5 minutes from one comment. That is utter BS.

 

 

 

 

[Sir_Kurity]

Post proof please, sounds very stupid.

[SnWRifleman]

I can't even get on. Plus it's against the rules to post messages from jagex and stuff. But it's 100% true.

[compfreak847]

Meh, the mods there have to put up with so much crap that I don't blame them for banning first and asking questions later.

[Sir_Kurity]

Actually compfreak, you can blame them.

 

 

 

If some guy goes to work and has a bad day because of Bob, and Tom, and other hypothetical workmates, does that mean he shouldn't be blamed for kicking his son Timmy when he gets home and "ask questions later"?

[compfreak847]

Actually compfreak, you can blame them.

 

 

 

If some guy goes to work and has a bad day because of Bob, and Tom, and other hypothetical workmates, does that mean he shouldn't be blamed for kicking his son Timmy when he gets home and "ask questions later"?

 

No, it means that if 50,000 people at work are constantly bothering him and he only has X amount of time to deal with him, he can either carefully go through and decided to ban a few of them but end up letting almost all of them go free, he can go through and quickly ban the ones that appear bad. Yeah, he might get a false positive every now and then, but it's much better then allowing almost all of them to go unchallenged.

[Sir_Kurity]

Considering the post is barely a sentence long and is clearly an attempt to be humorous and is not malicious in any way, i would say thats a pretty big false positive.

 

 

 

"It's better that 100 guilty men go free than one innocent man suffer."

[compfreak847]

"It's better that 100 guilty men go free than one innocent man suffer."

 

Not true when dealing with the RSOF. Humor and sarcasm are impossible to detect when ti's a long chain of stuipd comments, and if they let 100 people go free for every 1 innocent 1 day ban, literally no productive posts could be made out amidst the complete depravity that would be the RSOF.

[Sir_Kurity]

Look at that post, do you think if someone took about 2 seconds to read that post (sort of pushing it) that they would think it deserves a ban?

[compfreak847]

 

Look at that post, do you think if someone took about 2 seconds to read that post (sort of pushing it) that they would think it deserves a ban?

 

No dumber then how the rest of RSOF looks, I certainly wouldn't have identified it as sarcasm.