I'm confused...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Would this be better...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Def 45

 

 

 

Mage 82 or so (blood blitz, maybe ice)

 

 

 

90+ range

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Or this...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Def 70

 

 

 

Mage 70

 

 

 

Range 70

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

You decide.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Currently 41 def, 44 mage, 46 range. (42 combat.)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Thanks :3>

I would say..hmmm....from personal expirience I have a a dueler with 2 defence (mistake) and 70 range, yet I got killed quite a few times by someone with 40 defence wearing rune chain and full helm.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Now the question is, what will you wear with 70 def? If your not going to get a 70 def required armour then getting to 70 is not worth it and you should get the extra magic and range levels instead. It's also harder to find rane stakers that put armour on.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Now if you went to 40 and got the 90 or so Range and 85 or so Magic and you wore a rune chain that would work really well since your using your defence level effectively.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At my level (range 70, 2 def = combat 49) it's hard to hit with range on rune chainmail, but since range accuracy increases as your level goes up I have no idea how it would be at higher levels.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

IN SHORT SINCE I HAVE MIXED THOUGHTS: If you will utilize your 70 defence to get a 70 defence required armour go for it, if not stay with rune chain.

well, for ranging at level 45 defence i would use...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Archer helm

 

 

 

Rune chain

 

 

 

Blk dhide legs

 

 

 

Blk vambs

 

 

 

Rune boots

 

 

 

and obby rings

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

for 70 defence i could use..

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

kharils...lol.

 

 

 

but also for mage staking i could use ahrims...which would own because of it's mage defence...