insaneinsane

Do you applaud her for blaming her son's death on Bush when her son volunteered to serve in Iraq for a second time after he had already done it once and wanted to go again? Do you applaud her for using her son's death and image in a way that he clearly would have opposed as he chose to serve in Iraq twice after he saw and believed in the cause during his first tour? Taking a stand is great, but Sheehan is dishonoring the message her son clearly believed in with his own name. That's disgusting. He said that he doesn't agree with all of Sheehan's views. Bush is not to be blamed for Sheehan's son's death. However, he is to be questioned over the real motivation of the invasion of Iraq. ~Mike~

Respect. Please do not forget that, Just because someone has a diiferent view than you does not make them an idiot. Unless they believe that 2+2=997658957958770. In that case, they're an idiot. Regarding Congress, keep in mind that they only chose to go to war on the intelligence that bush gave them. This intelligence has been proven over and over to be false. In fact, the source never should have been credible. However, Congress was never made aware of this. ~Mike~

Well, my brother actually said this in real life: ~Mike~

Although it is true that her son should have known he was taking a risk, that does not disqualify her right to question the war. There is the right to Free Speech (first ammendment) and that applies to every American- regardless of if they lost a family member fighting a war. ~Mike~