BookWorm

This isn't a debate, but bowstrings and lobbies are how I make money as a member. I think cannonballs should be good too.

I am a member. I think there out to be f2p updates. It's not as if we lose anything. Besides, most members whine on the forums about the lameness of every single new update that comes out. If we don't want them, why not give them to f2p. Also, what might work is to give f2p an update say...6 months after it comes out on members. That way, it would let members have an advantage, and f2p would be happy too. I do think some things should be members only, but maybe f2p could train up to certain levels. Runecrafting, for example, has f2p runes until level 20, where it stops. This might work in some other currently members only skills too.

I love quests. Skilling, while originally enjoyable, can get monotonous. I bribe myself with quests to get my skills levels up, because otherwise, I'd get sooooooo bored.

I think there should be some shared updates, other than graphics. I know that my sister would stop being jealous if she got updates once in a while. Also, if the earlier numbers were correct, the free players contribute SOME money through advertisements, so they should get SOME updates. FYI, I'm a member, so don't say it's just sour grapes. It's a question of fairness. Also, something that might work is if f2p gets access to members stuff say...a year later. I don't think we'd care if they get access to the stupid "Tower of Life" or the updates everyone flames on Runescape Forums as unworthy of members. Afterall, if we think they're "unworthy", shouldn't f2p be able to have them?

I would like to point out to those using luring's "legality" as a defence, that probably the only reason it is legal is the problems of proving you were lured.