Yugoserb89

I'm not Flemish, nor have any connection to Flanders. But I've kept up with the situation, and picked a side. As I said, I'd love to hear counterarguments.

Belgium, the very motto of the EU, a country of three nationalities, united in balance. But beyond the walls of the Berlaymont, lies the true Belgium, one split and divided in haste, and unbalanced to the core. This brings about the question of Belgium. Belgium is divided among the Flemish in the north, and the Walloons in the South. There's also a small German part of the country. The question becomes difficult when Brussels is considered, which is located in Flanders. I would like your opinions on the question of Belgium, how and if it should split up, and if not? In my opinion, Belgium should be split by the Flemish declaring independence, and taking Brussels as their capital. As far as Wallonia goes, I don't care too much of its fate. It could join France for all I care, which wouldn't be a problem anyway seeing how downhill France has gone since Chirac and Sarkozy. The tiny German sector can join with Germany. Should an independent Wallonia be a condition of Flemish independence, I'd support it. But an independent Wallonia would fail without its support from Flanders. It would survive but off of a lifeline from the EU. For Flanders, they should bar the EU from using Brussels as its headquarters. I don't see any reason for, or good coming from a merging of Flanders and the Netherlands. The Netherlands would just drag down Flanders, assuming, of course, Vlaams Belang keeps on course as the major Flemish party. I welcome your opinions, and would love to hear them! :)