knight0735

ancient i am not making excuses..yes our members flamed but lk cant control wat people do...we can only react to the situation which means that before we can get rid of someone they have to break a rules first..

i thnk rice said it best. lk only has so much control over our members and we as rice pointed out we cant physically keep people from flaming or running out of bounds. there is evidence both clans had multi clanners. lk has worked to rectify this problem and i think we are making progress. watever the outcome lk accepts it

Thank you chester for saying the exact same thing you have been saying the entire time. And uffan i would contend that df is biased considering am8 has related many of his past experiences with lk w/e those may be to what is happening now. And it would appear he has some kind of grudge against lk. If this is the case 1 could argue that since am8 is a leader of df that df is being biased and unhelpful...but ofc every1 is entitled to post their opinions so we will see how much more am8 will be able to illustrate my point.

Thank you lk members for helping represent lk during this but this dispute is over. Either the leaders of both clans can work this out themselves or a mod can handle it. There isnt any point to an argument between ranks that cant really influence the outcome. Also thanks for your opinions amateurnoob and uffan however i would like to point out that you are making alot of assumptions about lk based only on your experiences with us. Which of course have not been good considering your own inability to follow the rules and then try to use these same rules against us. No clan is perfect and df is far from it..you guys have made alot of "non logical" decisions in the past (such as flaming us, having a dozen df members spam our clan chat, amateur in particular getting into fites with our leaders in matters that dont concern him....). Your biased opinion will not change the outcome of this dispute but given the circumstances I cant even find a logical reason why I am even having to talk to df about a war they werent even in? Not only that but you use what basic recruits say and do (even thought they dont represent lk) as a way to tell everyone that this is "the same lk" implying this always happens when clans war us? Perhaps df would like to talk with a real lk leader instead of acting all high over our basic members and our event managers? Once again df is wasting our time (and particularly mine). In our last war you brought 30 members or so to the fight where you knew the only real chance of winning was by d/q. I didnt know a clan could go so low and then accuse lk of being dishonorable and breaking rules.And now you actively seek to misrepresent lk as a clan that doesnt care about rules or what we do. But that is a different argument. To sum it all up what df is doing is uncalled for plain and simple. Next time you have a dispute maybe lk should get involved in a place we dont belong and start saying all sorts of things that arent true? But we wont because we are not the clan you tell people we are and we dont try to make life harder for other clans. In the mean time, lethality we have banned some of the offenders who broke rules and i wont deny that we broke some but know that your complaints are having an effect and we are working to resolve some of the disgraceful behavior some of our members had during the war. However I am not interested in a long drawn out dispute where we both accuse each other of multi clanning, out of bounds, flaming etc. We can have a future rematch or let a mod handle this whichever you prefer. And know that whatever anyone else says lk respects lethality and the rules of our wars. Lk is going through some changes and as a result not all of our events with other clans go smoothly. Regardless of who "officially" wins we want to say good fight and good luck. I want to clarify that lk will accept the outcome of this dispute without further complaint and any lk members who cause further trouble on this forum or in runescape will be punished.