SeanyTheSailor

sup

This tbh.

I figured they rely on people flagging it. Funnyjunk has the option to, I just don't think people use it. You can lead a horse to water but you cant make it drink.

Most stuff gets posted multiple times, and in multiple forms. So by saying "I didn't get credit in comic 1, 4 &6." There could be 5 of each, and none of them with similar tags making them easy to locate and/or differentiate. So I think ,apart from being an [wagon], there's little that can be feasibly done, so that's why nothing was done.

I was saying that one guy trying to screen the tsunami of content is ridiculous.

But he said he just wants credit and he doesn't care that it's on there if he gets it. At least that's what I'm getting from wits. And you can punish people for killing each other, but obviously they do it anyway. So by your analogy, any government that doesn't preside over a 0% crime rate should be shut down/replaced. I'm not saying that any government without a 0% crime rate is a failure, just like a website isn't a failure just because they have a few pieces of stolen content. But I am saying that its the government/website's responsibility to do what they can about it. I don't disagree with that. Like I said, all I'm saying is that I think The Oatmeal gets credit. And if it's not given, it's easy to get.

It says memecenter uploaded it 3 months ago. So logically them. But considering it's made of a bunch of content I guarantee the maker didn't produce, it's kind of a bad example. no its a good example. you have no idea who was original creator. and if you want to see more of this creator';s work.. you'[re screwed. I'd argue that's the creators fault for not attributing their "name" to it. You wouldn't write a book, then publish it without your name on it if you wanted people to know you made it.

But he said he just wants credit and he doesn't care that it's on there if he gets it. At least that's what I'm getting from wits. And you can punish people for killing each other, but obviously they do it anyway. So by your analogy, any government that doesn't preside over a 0% crime rate should be shut down/replaced.

It says memecenter uploaded it 3 months ago. So logically them. But considering it's made of a bunch of content I guarantee the maker didn't produce, it's kind of a bad example.

Then you scroll down to comments and either someone is blasting the poster for not giving credit, someone already asked where it's from, or you can ask where it's from. And as I said, most people don't even bother to remove the watermark. Yeah he deserves credit, I just don't think he isn't getting it.

You say that like the people/person who runs funnyjunk doesn't have absolute control over everything that goes on on their website. I was just browsing and saw something from The Oatmeal. The pure volume of stuff posted makes it probably near impossible. Well, I guess its alright then. Its not like they have any responsibility for the content hosted on their website, stamped with their logo, uploaded by their users. Most people don't even bother removing the watermarks. And those who do don't fool anybody. It's terribly obvious which stuff users made, and what stuff they share from other places. Yeah, just like its legal to pirate movies as long as you don't remove the title cards I'm not arguing that it's right, but the issue seems to be that he wasn't getting credit. I'm pointing out that he pretty much is. I've streamed movies for you guys before. Did you think I made them?

You say that like the people/person who runs funnyjunk doesn't have absolute control over everything that goes on on their website. I was just browsing and saw something from The Oatmeal. The pure volume of stuff posted makes it probably near impossible. Well, I guess its alright then. Its not like they have any responsibility for the content hosted on their website, stamped with their logo, uploaded by their users. Most people don't even bother removing the watermarks. And those who do don't fool anybody. It's terribly obvious which stuff users made, and what stuff they share from other places.

You say that like the people/person who runs funnyjunk doesn't have absolute control over everything that goes on on their website. I was just browsing and saw something from The Oatmeal. The pure volume of stuff posted makes it probably near impossible.

You say that like the people/person who runs funnyjunk has any real control over whether or not the posters give credit.

http://www.funnyjunk.com/funny_gifs/2995882/Perfect+take+down/ Brown haired kid=this thread Blond hair=Tripsis when she shows up

The page of BooB indeed.

http://www.funnyjunk.com/youtube/2996472/Arrow+to+the+knee/

I often think Pie/David is a waste of breathable air.

It's time to stop with that joke. I used to stop with that joke, then I realized it was never that funny and I never used it.

Halo makes a hobby of beating me in the face with the truth.

I should go back to derping.

Yes. More of That.

AND ZOE GETS THE GET!

Who will get the get?

Inb4 page 8000