Jump to content

psycraft

Members
  • Posts

    4
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

0 Neutral
  1. It was just a quick thought i had. Im not sure if its correct that time stand still at 0 degrees kelvin, seems logical to me tho since the lack of energy would prevent any events of any kind. Time are just an human invention. A scientist would most likely tell you 'time' is just another dimension you can move in. But since i have no concept of 4d objects i cant really argue about it :oops: Well it seems like you can sum up any theory about the creation of the universe to absolute nothingness ( whether there is a 'void' or not ) strives to become everything, how and why are questions i dont think mankind will ever get answers to. Its fun arguing about tho :wink:
  2. The 'void' i referred to was the theoretical perfect space in which our universe exists, only problem with that reasoning is that it means our universe exists in itself, as our definition of 'universe' is everything. The thermodynamic laws needs time to apply, in 0 degrees kelvin, perfect space, time stands still in effect.
  3. There isnt a single tiny piece of evidence that life or matter has any purpose at all, in fact, why would it have? All life that might have arose before the universe reaches its final state are bound for destruction, and no new lifeforms would be able to come into existance when the universe do fall asleep, or how to describe the state. Maywest posted the figure 1 to 10^256 chance of 'life' coming into existance also. The only problem with this argument is that if the void in which our universe sprung to life is infinite, one could say that if it happened at least once ( our universe ), it must have happened a infinite amount of times. This would mean that all events which dont have exactly zero chance of occuring will and has occured an infinite amount of times, which renders the argument "the chance is so small it could not have happened" invalid.
  4. Maywest, just out of curiousity, could u post ur source for those numbers? I spent a few mins on google but didnt find anything near those. Another argument for evolution not mentioned would be how poorly designed life on this planet is. All materia on this planet are lethal to us in someway. What we refer to as a 'natural' death is the price we pay for breathing ( oxygen specific ), as an example. The proteins and stuff ( not sure what everything is called in english lol ) we are built of do indeed look more like some piece of scrap created by pure coincidence then by some higher being. It is barely holding together and wont do so for too long. The time left for mankind was estimated to around 500k years if i dont remember wrong unless we manage to kill ourself, which is much more likely to happen :lol:
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.