January 27, 200818 yr Wal-Mart and Target for the win? I feel like a spoiled, horrible person if I spend more than $10 on any one piece of clothing (except shoes can be up to $35). No money troubles (per say), but I have better things to spend it on. You realise you pay nearly the same amount at Target/Wal-Mart for clothes, right? I mean, if you do a little searching you can find some nice clothes at brand name stores for really good prices. Over the holidays Aeropostal had t-shirts on for $5 each. I don't remember the last time I got t-shirts that cheap anywhere. And if you think spending a little money on clothing is being spoiled, I have to assume you come from either a very low income family or your parents just don't like to spend money at all. The last pair of shoes I bought were $100. I usually go for the $50 shoes or whatever but these are holding up a lot better than the cheaper ones. Normally after 6+ months my shoes would be looking pretty worn out but these still look very nice. And for those who are Holister fanatics read this. It's good stuff for anyone to read really. It's funny and makes a good point about that "wonderfully unique" store. You're dumb as hell. Who ever said Hollister was unique? It's a store with many locations, correct? Well they're all going to sell the same thing because they're all getting it from the same place. And they can't build the store to look different from the rest of the locations because it's a franchise and they have to follow the rules in order to have the store. Now go beat yourself with a blunt object for a while for being so [developmentally delayed]ed. Internet Marketing For Newbies
Create an account or sign in to comment