What do you think about it?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I made the background and the fighter, i took the archer from google though, changed the hat, boots, bow, arrows and abit more... colored and shaded. c/c? :P

oops

change the bow up it looks a bit blue

Ok i changed it. :lol:

:? look like diars the one he put in his

Lol It is.. From the google search site =P

HEY!!! thats looks a bit familiar...hmm...(thinks) where may i have seen that!? o ya!!! MY CRAPPY SIG!!......isnt that um..a...RIPPING!!!???since you stole somthing from my sig????...i may not have drawn it but youo still stole it from my sig...you basically stole my sig...you did steal my sig...you ripped the whole thnig :evil:

HEY!!! thats looks a bit familiar...hmm...(thinks) where may i have seen that!? o ya!!! MY CRAPPY SIG!!...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Thought you liked your sig?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Well at least you colored the Google'd image, but still isn't much at all.

i do like it but its still crappy and..all that volture did was copy my sig and cut out eveything from my sig except the pic...then added there name and colored the archer...if you notice that they are in the same position...?(?hmm?)?...

Rofl diar you stole it yourself, its not yours, you didnt draw it. im just improving it, your just using it plain, i never said im gonna use it, nor sell it, noob.

neithe rof u stole it..it was on google to be looke dat and used :roll:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

and the noob comment was un called for tohugh.....

you copied my sig...cut everything out except the picture and then put your name on it...then you colored it...thats ripping...and why would you do that theres no practice in it except for "flood fill"...so therefor you ripped it...and your asking ppl how YOUR sig looks...(if you notice the archer is the same and in the exact same place)

you copied my sig...cut everything out except the picture and then put your name on it...then you colored it...thats ripping...and why would you do that theres no practice in it except for "flood fill"...so therefor you ripped it...and your asking ppl how YOUR sig looks...(if you notice the archer is the same and in the exact same place)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

how could he steal it from you if you didnt even make the darn pic in the first place? :shock:

neithe rof u stole it..

 

 

 

Actually, they both stole it. If one should be punished, an equal punishment should be given to the other, since they both plagerised.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nice drawing though, to whoever made it. But the photomanip attempt was really weak - all you did was fill it with colours. Didn't even bother shading... :roll:

Wow this is possibly the dumbest argument I've ever witnessed. You two are arguing over a Googled image! And diar, all you did was put a bit of text in it, HE DIDN'T STEAL IT! You both stole it technically, so neither of you should be whining. Go actually make a sig that this argument can't apply to, then you'll get some respect. Otherwise you're just someone who has Google powers and the ability to use the text tool in paint.

No, Actually peter if it was represented at google it means the author ment for it to spread around the net, meaning i didnt steal it, and he cant accuase me of anything. besides, he didnt do anything... i added alot of stuff and changed the ranger so it dosent look the same, ill change face too its ugly.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

P.S You didnt draw it = not yours, idiot.

 

neithe rof u stole it..

 

 

 

Actually, they both stole it. If one should be punished, an equal punishment should be given to the other, since they both plagerised.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nice drawing though, to whoever made it. But the photomanip attempt was really weak - all you did was fill it with colours. Didn't even bother shading... :roll:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dude wat are you talking about?

 

 

 

no one should be punished for plagerism (i dont think that is spelled correctly)

 

 

 

plagerism does not apply since google images are free for people to use

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

no laws have been broken bud

 

 

 

and so what, both of you took an image from a site and used it on a sig

 

 

 

wats the big deal

 

 

 

why would he have to steal ur sig if he could get the same image off of google

ffs im not using it as a sig! :|

No, Actually peter if it was represented at google it means the author ment for it to spread around the net, meaning i didnt steal it, and he cant accuase me of anything. besides, he didnt do anything... i added alot of stuff and changed the ranger so it dosent look the same, ill change face too its ugly.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

P.S You didnt draw it = not yours, idiot.

 

 

 

before you worked on it you copied my sig then deleted everything but the archer so you wouldnt have to try and position it...besides ppl get in trouble for stealing like a pixel sized bunny for backgrounds...

are you an idiot or what? THAT SIG IS NOT YOURS, YOU DIDNT MAKE IT, IT BELONGS TO SOMONE WHO UPLOADED IT TO GOOGLE WHICH MEANS IT IS FREE TO USE YOU IDIOT.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

besides, yes i have repositioned it and it takes about 25 seconds to do that.