The main problem with the first article (and the one that annoyed me enough to log in and comment on it) is that despite the fact that the author sounds like a logical person, who knows the rules for good writing, he has to resort to childish insults and massive exaggerations to make his point. For example: "... Soul Wars, a horrific minigame, visited largely by those who wished to abuse bugs to harvest heaping experience, and pure characters who wanted fast experience without the annoyance of killing monsters or watching a screen." Do Tip.It Times editors really think that this kind of rhetoric helps the writer make his point? Is it really necessary to resort to blanket accusations of rule-breaking against everybody who enjoys something you don't like? Unfortunately, this kind of rhetoric is becoming common in RL politics. I will not divert the thread off-topic by bringing up specific examples, but I do hope that the article's negative reception teaches the writer (and also Tip.It editors who chose to publish it) that mixing your opponents with dirt isn't the most effective or persuasive way to make your point.