yamamoto

This kind of a small "separation" for the non-members or pure f2p players. Hopefully, this isn't the affirmative action I am seeing right now, it's only for "members". :evil:

let's see... -1020 (total) divided by 88 (combat lvl) = to 11.6 MY gosh :shock: thelegends sound its like my worst I ever done... Non-members rules anyways. \ Thinking bout chu makes me cry but inside Im happy

I agree with the all bank psace as the rares and the items that kept being added to the updates. But same with f2p members, f2p members would be happy to see more updates for the free players. Also I want to add on to members that they should make some guides to newer p2p members as their first time playing. Either way both p2p & f2p players suffer for demand of updates. In a recent surveys a lot of people say they want the prices for members to be a bit cheaper, like equal prices. What happen to the saying " Only $5 a month!" now some people has to pay $10.95 or more, mainly the 11 dollars plus are out of the United States. Jagex should increase bank spaces, adequate quests ranges, more land, and more atttractions to the game. As well as Jagex cannot solve a few problems like the cheaters and bug abuses happening on runescape. So there's a pinwheel on the block that never balances.

I use mainly family's computer to be safer. :shame: I dont like this discussion a little bit, in my AP English class, we had to analyze six sources about the internet, and one of the sources mentioned about Higher and lower incomes depends on the families. At school, moderately, some schools completely ban from most internet gaming and some other stuff you're not even suppose to see. Mainly, these users use the school's or the public such as libraries to check their e-mails or researching, these are categorized as lower income families. Family, your own and friends' computers categorized a bit of the both incomes but mainly higher incomes. Not sure having your own computer, maybe around 18 or 20 years of age. Take pride and responsibility. You might never know what are you looking at, and extremely not looking at websites you're not even suppose to be on. (In higher income families, most likely)

I voted for NO Opinion and I am never ever EVER going to become a member, because I have some beliefs, and done some observations, that I would say to myself, oh no, I am not that type of a person. I know most of you would say this in your head: You're just jealous, You're too poor, you're a noob, members are better than non-members or you stink. I have heard those words typed over and over to me, So? If you look at the price of becoming a member in the U.S. noticed its not $5 ranged from $10 and up same with any other currency. An F2P player always!!! \

What so ever, Jagex shouldn't use the macroing stuff at all, and find an immediate way to ban the software, its ridiculously harmful, look at the Runescape economy, many in fact because of inflation and perhaps, they don't have enough money or have the technology to come up and wipe out all the cheaters. Mine as well make a world for different divisions so all groups could have a signifigant equality and freedom. I don't know so far I'm seeing some good posts where I would support others ideas about this issue. More likely, to become moderately appealed to everyone who are anti-macroing.