Jump to content

pienaple

Members
  • Posts

    82
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

0 Neutral

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. But don't forget someone actually had to have the money to buy the rare from the person that originally had it >_> So maybe if there wasn't any, people would not even go for big money goals?
  2. The same as it is now. What do you mean I'm biased against rares? How dare you... I'm sorry, what? I don't get what you said there >_> To answer everyone else, why would the market be the same? People may not spend loads of money on p hats, but instead on their own skills. Maybe there would not be much money at all?
  3. ....If there was no rares. I mean c'mon, would there be as much staking as there was before? Would there be as many rich people as there is now? Would people actually spend their earned money on skills, instead of meaningless rares. I don't know. Think how different it would be. Items that are hard to get would be the "Popular" ones. Things like Third age sets would be worshipped. Or would they? I don't know. I'm not really that much of a senior members of Runescape. In fact I'm not at all. But that's where you tifers come in. Tell what you think about this crazy idea and lets see if Runescape would be the same as it is now :P [/Attempt to make a hot topic again]
  4. I don't think it's fake. I mean what would be the point? Why would he edit the picture just to say "Look at this pic I took! Give me respect!" Nah it's not fake. If you wish i may try to catch some more pictures in different areas?
  5. Oh that seems fair. Although i do not agree that this should be moved to Help&Advice. I think this is more of a discussion than a problem.
  6. Right well I've not been playing a lot lately and since i'm going on a holiday in 3 days, i thought i would put money into my Kingdom for 3 weeks. As i was getting my disposition thing from 26% to 100% i was browsing forums a lot, looking at guide etc. What i have noticed is that if i have a different tab open for about 20 seconds or more, when i switch to the rs screen in looks like this for a split second: [hide=0_o][/hide] (It was very hard to get that screenshot, so i want respect for that :D) So....What i am thinking is maybe RS is rendered differently when we are looking at different webpages? I mean like, when we switch it tries to optimize the experience so we don't get much lag doing what we wanted to do? Im not sure if this has ANY discussion value, but I think it's kinda interesting to see what you tifers have to say P.S - I definitely have higher requirements than needed to run RSHD so don't say it's my PC
  7. Looks like the prophecy is coming true? http://www.runescapelending.com/ P.S - I am in no way advertising that site or encouraging anyone to use it. If mods find this inappropriate then please remove it.
  8. I actually DO know how to blend, it's just i prefer not to. I mean c'mon, since when is there a rule that tells you how sigs are supposed to be made? There's no "right" way to blend/shade/draw etc. People have different styles, so maybe i just wanted to be different? :P
  9. Well, I'm staring at a few prime examples of signatures with a lack of blending in this thread. Jopie knows her stuff, kai? And she gives some of the best C/C out there. No offence to you, Pienaple, but Pomar, you can't really think that the signature is "REALLY GOOD". There are so many flaws. Just look at the text! For some C/C - The text is awful. A simple arial black font is better in signatures than any of that jazzy crap. The render takes up 50% of the background leaving you not much room to place effects carefully. Those abstract fractals or brushes, look terrible. Try using some proper C4D's and using them to your advantage. For example, using them to blend, smudging them for colour, and any other effects you can think of. Brushes aren't the best thing to use. And you DO need to blend. Remember, this is C/C so it's not meant to offend you. I'm trying to help you. Thanks a lot for it. I am not going to re-edit the sig but instead i will make another one and try to improve on it. Oh and by the way - I have not used any downloadable brushes in all of my photoshop usage. I sometimes use the basic brush set for smudging but thats it. The backgrounds are C4Ds and Fractal render so you are slightly correct :P
  10. Blending any part of the render is out of question for me :) It may not look blended but the colors beg to differ :P
  11. The text does not suit the signature at all. Otherwise very nice, although some blending work is needed :thumbsup:
  12. I DID smudge the render in the background, but i guess what put that off is the fact that i used 4 C4Ds.... Oh and a thing about blending, I KNOW how to do it properly but the fact is that its my style to have the render "pop out" of the sig, since i really don't like the look of smudge overlapping the render from the top to underneath. So...uhh yeah.
  13. pienaple

    New sig

    Meh thought i would make myself a new one. Rate/Hate/Mastur...whatever
  14. Thanks, but for me +5 to str is not worth the extra money :)
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.