Mb1911

You're right, because only the best of the best intelectual minds in America can sit on their show and swear at someone. That's what respect is made of. What news do you watch? MSNBC?

If you were in charge of handling interogation and getting information for the United States, what would your method be?

Even though that was you're last post, you're saying you'd like to try the the people in the CIA? You said we would not know if they were guilty unless we had a trial. You'd like to try and prosecute the brave people of the CIA who have been working to keep you safe?! And if you believe they are guilty and what they say is a lie, you should have no trust in the American government at all. Regarding you're "scientific journal," as i stated in my first post on this issue, that was the original way the Japanese introduced waterboarding, using dirty water, etc., but now we have medical professionals on site and we do not use that dirty water. Why would we kill someone who might have information for us?

Bloodstain, we don't just accept any Muslim from Iraq. We know that those held at Gitmo are terrorists, but we have not done a full trial for them. If we were to do a full trial we would just come to the conclusion that legally they are terrorists, which we already know. We did not just offer money to bring us Muslim people from Iraq. As requested by Bloodstain ^ : http://www.cnsnews.com/Public/Content/A ... rcid=46949

The psychological harm is way worse than the physical. ^and drowning someone and then stopping it at the last second is borderline?! You're right because we wouldn't want to mentally harm the terrorists responsible for killing thousands of Americans. And if you think they are innocent, do you think they were just dropped into battle with a gun and they had no intention of killing anyone?

I'm sure you're referring to the torture technique of waterboarding, if it was mentioned in an earlier post, I'm sorry. The waterboarding that the United States partakes in is very different from that of which the Japanese first introduced. The United States ensure there are medical professionals on site as well as other more advanced techniques to waterboarding to ensure less physical harm. There was also a case of "torture" reported that took place in Guantanamo Bay where we learned that the mastermind of September 11, 2001, Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, has a fear of bugs. A caterpillar was placed in his room while he slept and he was aware it was there. Do you consider that as torture because the people screaming for prosecution against people that partake in the method of waterboarding believe it is. I saw on the first page someone said you'd have to ask John McCain. John McCain does not believe the United States should torture because he himself has been tortured and he believes it is the only thing that separates us from the terrorists.

:lol: :lol: :lol: OT: Stance: Would cause far too many problems, especially in the US. There would be sermons, FOX "News" reports, and all the other right-wing gasbags calling for a boycott of the game. Kids would be told by their parents not to play in many cases. I support equal marriage rights for all couples IRL, but in RS? It's just not needed. Religion: Athiest (Yes Vann, I know what it means) Orientation: Straight If you're criticizing FOX News, surely you don't watch MSNBC either. If Jagex took the opposite stance and said they do not believe in gay marriage, the far-left smear machine would do the exact same thing, but only they would have less viewers so it wouldn't make any difference. But surely you believe that it is up to the parents to decide?

You can't always trust Wikipedia... But know this, I agree that no one should hate or wish harm upon someone because they are gay. As far as the science debate goes, there is much to be said, but again as I said in my last post, that is a debate for another time. This topic is about Jagex and their game content. Today, most everyone agrees that gay people should be respected and have rights, but when it comes to marriage that is where it changes. The reason that gay marriage is being debated in America is due to the fact that America was founded on Christian principles, including the definition of a traditional marriage. And because it is such a heated debate, Jagex should not even cover that topic at all.

It has nothing to do with teaching anything or pushing ideas. You cannot consciously choose your sexual orientation. Well as you said before, you believe that there is something in their genetics as proven by science, but not everyone believes that, but that is another debate for another time. But if Jagex were to do this, they would be pushing the message for gay marriage and saying that everyone should support it, but not all parents think that way. Therefor, the parents should be able to discuss this matter, (gay marriage), with their children as they wish.

Religion: Christian Stance: Jagex does not need to become involved in the Gay Rights' Movement. I believe that Jagex should allow the parents of each individual player to teach their children as they wish without the concern of a gaming company pushing their ideas on their child.

hai ur hawt

:o I herd u r teh nub fisher ..... =o gl on the slaying buddy... even though you haven't been on in a while :D :D

Can you say N00bish Nab? =o Nice Life L0l

yes :ugeek: I agree with Icey tbh Get on you N00b so you can N00b up rs again!!!!! :pray: :wall: :roll:

gl on teh 99 str <3 and 85 slayer !!!! =D> =D> \