Sir_Armadyl

That's not how burden of proof works. If someone claims something to be true, they must provide proof to back their claim. Until they can prove it to be true, it's untrue. Thus, Sir Armadyl's claim is untrue until he provides proof (preferably something other than a few links that simply state his claim to be true rather than with EVIDENCE and TESTING). Do you know what Devil's Proof is? Basically, there's no evidence that they're not weak to stab and there's no evidence that they are, which makes it true until it is tested. It's like saying that light orbs carry electricity within wires - there's no proof that that's not true until you look it up or test it yourself, which mean both truths exist at the same time. You are totally right, i have tested it (long time ago) and as i said i used darklight in stab and also d hally, i got quicker kills, but still, these might be just luck...

omg, so i think that if i link this thread to support CR (as it is winning) it wont count because you think they make the stuff up? i donno but u kinda sound like an ass =/

Besides, when i kill them and darklight isnt working i swich to stab and hits (this CAN be luck, but it happens 100% of time so...)

http://www.runehq.com/database.php?type=monster&id=00991 STAB, http://es.kendincos.net/video-frtltrr-my-tormented-demon-drops-dragon-claws.html SLASH, http://es.kendincos.net/video-frtltrr-my-tormented-demon-drops-dragon-claws.html STAB, http://forums.zybez.net/blog/1309/entry-3786-show-me-your-weakness-you-monsters/ STAB. That is 3-1 to stab, 4-1 with wikia, i dont really think it is wrong....

Fine, ill check in other pages and find the truth.

why is it bad? It is a better source than random internet pages....

Im saying that wikia is never wrong, and when it is, players correct it. Its a "wiki", wikipedia also have typos, but you still know that they will be corrected. For example, Balmung isnt 133 str now, is it?

Show me evidence they arent?

Because that is not only almost completely wrong, but its also a totally illogical way of looking at it. CR isn't a "Jacked up version of whip", since they use different attack styles as their main option (stab vs slash) CLS is faster then GS, and will under most circumstances, possibly all, out power and preform it. CR is almost always better then CLS, even for bosses, unless you aren't using defender (And if you aren't soloing or tanking, you should be using a defender, or at least have one with you.) Maul may not max as high as AGS can, but it will still outperform the GS for pure DPS, even including the 2 specs/minute the AGS has. If anything, the maul has more KO potential, as it more consistently hits higher then a GS will. And sir arma, I EDIT the RS wiki, partially because there are SOO many errors. (Remembers when balmung was said to have +133 str...) omg, that must have been the day after release ir a typo, as i said, anyone can change it, so typos are posible. Besides, theres nothing better than wikia, well besides tip.it. U cant compare wikia with zybez or rrunehq. (wikia is way better)

Fixed that for you. Find 1 mistake and prove it. Then ill say ur right.

Yea there is, Wikia is never EVER wrong, cause if it is, another player changes it. And since i did WGS and TDs, they were weak to stab. Wikia is like this thread, players report they personal experiences to what is the weakness of demons, just check this link: http://runescape.wikia.com/wiki/Tormented_demon

Im in like page 20, but i think you still think that Chaotic Maul>C. Rapier in tds. This is not true as: 1) C. Rapier may hit 290 and 270, so u get 2 hits and not 1 in very little time. Besides, the maul will fail in some point (i mean in hit) 2)TDs are weak to stab, check this link if not: http://runescape.wikia.com/wiki/Tormented_demon under pic in "weakness" 3) In the matter of CR vs CLS, IMO is like comparing D long and D scimy, i might be wrong, but i trully think so.