Jump to content

Crocefisso

Members
  • Posts

    1719
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by Crocefisso

  1. I tend to use Rotten Tomatoes for this sort of stuff these days, but just to give a taste of some of the past few months of film viewing:

     

    -Ugetsu Monogatari - 9/10. Atmospheric period piece, cinematography excellent and a great adaptation of 18th century morality literature.

     

    -The Leopard - 9/10. Although long, this is a stunningly beautiful and compelling portrait of the decline of the aristocracy. Subtle and elegaic.

     

    -Lincoln - 8/10. Day Lewis mainly carries this, but nevertheless Spielberg's usual simple morality has managed not to annoy me in this one instance.

     

    -The 3 Worlds of Gulliver - 5/10. A very average adaptation of a literary classic, forgettable and decidedly hammy.

     

    -Citizen Kane - 9/10. I can see why it's a classic. Amazing character study, beautifully shot and marvellously acted.

     

    -Ocean Waves - 6/10. A rather bland and angsty story of unrequited 'teen love'.

  2. Arrietty - not as good as any other Ghibli film I've seen, this is a straightforward adaptation of the borrowers with very Spielberg-esque structure and ending; a 6/10 at best.

     

    Three questions to our film-watching regulars here:

     

    a) Any of you guys got a Rotten Tomatoes account? (I opened one two days ago and have busily rated 110 films from memory since then)

     

    b) If so, add me: http://www.rottentomatoes.com/member/crocesigismondi/

     

    c) Please look at my reviews and if you think it appropriate nominate me as a 'super-reviewer'. Given some of the terrible reviews I've read on the site by alleged 'super-reviewers', I quite fancy the title myself :P

  3. ^ I think the Grand Armée's 1812 invasion is the perfect summary of why not to invade Russia. Sure, the casualties weren't the same, but the role the weather played in the 19th century was far more decisive.

  4. @ Kaida: I love Abbott and Costello. They deserve a place in history for that 'Who's on first' sequence alone.

     

    @Jona: Also largely agree with you, never much liked SotD.

     

    As for all the films I've been watching recently, a few of the more memorable:

     

    -Red Sorghum - this film had real potential, and I think there was quite a lot to like about it - great cinematography, richly textured portrayals of Chinese peasant life - but the narrative was a bit disjointed and weak. Strong ending was another redeeming factor, and overall a 7/10.

     

    -Vertigo - I cannot see how this is as good as some of Hitchcock's other films, such as the perfect Rear Window. The plot was convoluted and James Stewart's character has the emotional depth of a child. It started out intriguing and ended up, one too many twists and turns later, a little tiresome; nevertheless, it was a good quality film throughout. 7/10.

     

    -Animal Kingdom - that Australian gangster films even exist was surprising for me. That it is so well acted and the characters so varied, well realised and well portrayed - Uncle Pope is as sinister as Joe Pesci in Goodfellas - was an additional bonus. Certainly the best film produced so far this decade (ie, since 2010). 9/10.

  5. I'll take straight cold over windchill any day. Wind (and damp) sucks the energy out of you much faster than straight weather does.

     

    Offered a place to study history at Oxford. :razz:

    Congrats! :thumbsup:

    Thanks Kaida. :)

  6. So today my 14 year old cousin asked me if 'asked' was a word. She then asked for the meaning of the words summon, ritual and humanity (we were watching Cabin in the Woods). Yeah, I'm not sure what to make of it.

    Perhaps she needs testing for dyslexia or something? These are quite basic words for a 14 year old.

  7. That's what prosthetics are for :P

    Apparently not. The reviews of Life of Pi that I read said things like the CGI added "spiritual wonder" (and this particular reviewer panned every other aspect of the film). Everyone seems to be convinced these days that CGI can add depth and increase involvement in a film, and I frankly cannot see it.

     

    I perhaps should have been clearer that I wasn't really responding to decebal's comment, given that i've never seen the film he mentions, simply that it sparked a trail of thought for me.

  8. I'm unconvinced that CGI actually adds anything to a film, other than a glossier finish, and have yet to see a film where it has actually contributed to the story. In Life of Pi, for example, most of the allegory was shoved into sequences either side of a fairly standard castaway affair, so the CGI did nothing to add to the trite subtext.

     

    Yesterday evening watched Tim Burton's Batman, can't say I was very impressed. 5/10.

  9. I'm going to try drinking less.

    Telling this after coming out of a weeklong drinking spree...

    In my defence, I was in Germany and I didn't get seriously drunk more then once, I just wanted to try all the different beers that I could find (25 was it, I think).

    I don't think anyone can blame you for that. Did you have Erdinger weissbier?

  10. On the back of Tokyo Story, I watched Brothers and Sisters of the Toda Family, by the same director and on similar themes. The redemption of Shojiro and the one-sided loveliness of Setsuko (compared with the guild ridden Noriko in Tokyo Story) made the film happier but ultimately less powerful. Where the widow in Brothers and Sisters is taken in by Shojiro, and the film ends with Shojiro comically trying to escape a marriage arrangement by running away onto a beach out of bashfulness, Tokyo Story's ending is very much in the vein of one of the last major interactions, in which one character asks Noriko "Isn't life disappointing?" and she smiles feebly, before answering "I'm afraid it is." The ungrateful children in Brothers and Sisters are scolded at the film's end and walk out in shame, but those in Tokyo Story merely return to Tokyo, having grabbed trinkets from their dead mother, to continue their past behaviours.

     

    Brothers and Sisters of the Toda Family is nevertheless a very strong film, worthy of about 8/10.

  11. No, you need to learn to cook. Eating at McDonalds every day, if nothing else, is ridiculously expensive. You can eat for less by cooking for yourself, and you can eat at other resturants and get 2x the food for the same price, or more (I get Chinese delivery for about the same as a McDonald value meal with large fries, which is easily twice as much food or more). If I cook for myself, I can eat nearly a pound of ground beef and a salad (it's a combo, I call it taco salad) for an average of like $7 or less per night (mostly enough times to use up the spinach and cheese).

     

    As for my resolutions, there is nothing in my life I would change that I am not in process of changing already.

    At present I eat fruit for breakfast and have a late, large lunch at a restaurant for just over £10. I then don't eat again until breakfast the next day (the exception is Sundays, where I don't have lunch because I'm cycling and instead have dinner at a restaurant). Would cooking lunch and dinner really be cheaper than this (good UK supermarkets are v. expensive)?

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.