gimmem0ney

Wow, it really does last 6 months? If so that would be pretty good news. Btw, i went through the messages again...... and if anyone sees mod Bartlett shoot him for me :wink: He replied to all the 4 messages i got back, and all 4 were the same automated message..... didn't even take the time to read em, just replied with the same automated message 4 times. And about the Pmod thing..... yea it is pretty unlikely, but i can always hope : And sorry about all the questions, bu how do you know it lasts 6 months? Went through pretty much the whole RS website, and it isn't indicated anywhere.

Nothing offensive about your post Suox, to be honest I think about it the same way you do....... Just sucks so badly to get banned for nothing, even worse to hear them say they have evidence, yet they don't show me anything, and worst of all you're probably right, ban will stand i think........... Lets just hope we're bth wrong :pray:

Yea, it was an automated message........... But is there anyone that can veryify the 6 month thing, or is my account lost forever? :(

Wow, hope i get that kind of luck as well : Problem is though, i already appealed the ban, and they declined it....... and i cant appeal it again. And its written in the ban/mutes section that they wont even consider messages appealing bans outside of the ban appeal section. So that kinda means my account is banned for something i didnt do, and i cant even appeal it anymore :( All i can do is hope that the 6 month thing is true, is there anyone that can confirm it?

A few days ago jagex banned me for real life trading. I never did anything to benefit from runescape in real-life, but they said they had evidence, so i just went to see what evidence they had against me. So i went to the appeal a ban section, logged in on my account and saw the offence i committed according to them. I clicked on 'view the evidence' and after that on 'i demand to see the evidence'. I expected to see something stupid from jagex, seeing how people are getting banned for the craziest reasons. And this is what i saw: "This account has been banned because of Encouraging Other To Break Rules & Real World Trading. We have evidence to prove that you have being intentionally playing RuneScape in order to financially benefit yourself in the real world. You have been deemed to be in complete control at the time of the incident." No evidence at all, and my ban appeal was rejected. So here i am...... sitting with a banned account, which got banned for something i never did, and they refuse to show me "the evidence" they have. I sent 10 messages to them now, and gotten 4 replies so far. All 4 were automated replies, showing that they didnt even read what i wrote. But when i told my friend about it, he said that a permanent ban isn't permanent, but for 6 months. My friend is a very trustworthy person, but i'd like to hear some more people about this. Is a permanent ban really permanent, or only for 6 months? Thank you.

Lets say u have a 99 str warrior, a 99 mage, and a 99 ranger Melee: D dag spec, 4 times with 1 spec bar, every hit able to hit 30+ and u get 2 hits each spec......... Mages: freeze, hit very good, even on armor that is supposed to have high resistence against magic and the ability to stop ppl from teleing. Ranger: (we'll use MSB as an example, since its the only bow with a special that could be useful in pking) max hit is around 22? U can only do 1 special with a WHOLE spec bar, and you'll still only hit twice without alot more damage per hit. Basically this just shows that warriors have a HUGE advantage as they can KO ppl very easily. Not just the d dag spec hits high, but the high hits with whip, and its very high speed allows u to have your opponent eat 70% of the fight. And when u get your opponent on low health u have 4 specials to use, each special consists of 2 hits, each capable of hitting 30+, meaning u could hit 60 with each spec u get! Mages have the ability to stop there opponent from teleing and moving, so even though mages dont have the ko ability that the warriors have, they can easily stop there prey from getting away. Rangers.......... Well um...... We have a crappy special (yes, it does have a little ko chance, but still doesnt compare with dds spec), we cant stop our opponent from moving or teleing, and at 99 range u max hit is 22 with msb? Mages can hit 30 at lvl 80 magic (god spell+ charge) and warriors can hit 22 at about lvl 80 strength? (Correct me on this please, i always have been more of a ranger/mage than a warrior) Basically rangers are the hardest to get a kill with. Plus we could take a look at barrows as well: Melee got 4 DIFFERENT types of armor, all with awesome specials on their full armor (except for torags, but it makes up with its huge defence bonus). Mages got ahrims, special isnt really good, but the stats are great. U get a very nice magic bonus, and it has by far the best defence bonus of all the mage robes. And yet again.............. rangers? We got an armor with almost the same stats as black dragonhide, but a slightly higher mage defence bonus, and the special is practically useless for pking. What i'm trying to say here is that mages are pretty easy to get kills with (though it costs alot), warrior have a huge chance on ko's and rangers got practically nothing that is comparable to what the mages and warriors have. If there is any class that is underpowered and needs updates, its the rangers.