10 untexted sigs

[Zoidnerd]

1:

 

 

2:

 

 

3:

 

 

4:

 

 

5:

 

 

6:

 

 

7:

 

 

8:

 

 

9:

 

 

10:

 

 

 

 

samples are there to prevent those rippers out there. Yes I know your out there.

[tomdavies90]

make samples smaller, can't see some of them too well, even hidden ones can be found quite easily by other artists if someone rips a sig

 

they look pretty good though from what i can see

[Zoidnerd]

make samples smaller, can't see some of them too well, even hidden ones can be found quite easily by other artists if someone rips a sig

 

they look pretty good though from what i can see

 

 

 

soz :(

[Guest TaDaraCampbell]

The "SAMPLE" really hinders my ability to see the pictures as they are meant to be viewed.

 

 

 

They look nice (from what I can see), but why did you save them as jpgs? Jpgs, as you can notice on some of your pictures, can mess up the clarity of the picture some. PNG is a much better choice. :wink:

[Zoidnerd]

The "SAMPLE" really hinders my ability to see the pictures as they are meant to be viewed.

 

 

 

They look nice (from what I can see), but why did you save them as jpgs? Jpgs, as you can notice on some of your pictures, can mess up the clarity of the picture some. PNG is a much better choice. :wink:

 

 

 

ripping purposes i have all my origionals in png format

[runescape_rocks]

The "SAMPLE" really hinders my ability to see the pictures as they are meant to be viewed.

 

 

 

They look nice (from what I can see), but why did you save them as jpgs? Jpgs, as you can notice on some of your pictures, can mess up the clarity of the picture some. PNG is a much better choice. :wink:

 

 

 

*sigh* another random person who drops by the gallery and think they know what they talk about.

 

 

 

anyways, jpeg is only bad for pixels.

[Nadril]

The "SAMPLE" really hinders my ability to see the pictures as they are meant to be viewed.

 

 

 

They look nice (from what I can see), but why did you save them as jpgs? Jpgs, as you can notice on some of your pictures, can mess up the clarity of the picture some. PNG is a much better choice. :wink:

 

 

 

*sigh* another random person who drops by the gallery and think they know what they talk about.

 

 

 

anyways, jpeg is only bad for pixels.

 

 

 

Indeed. Anoys the crap out of me too when people say that.

 

 

 

 

 

At any rate, zoid, could you have made the samples any more obnoxious? I can't comment on anything because I can't see anything.

[Guest TaDaraCampbell]

The "SAMPLE" really hinders my ability to see the pictures as they are meant to be viewed.

 

 

 

They look nice (from what I can see), but why did you save them as jpgs? Jpgs, as you can notice on some of your pictures, can mess up the clarity of the picture some. PNG is a much better choice. :wink:

 

 

 

*sigh* another random person who drops by the gallery and think they know what they talk about.

 

 

 

anyways, jpeg is only bad for pixels.

 

Well, I can't learn without asking questions, and if all newcomers were a "random person" you would only see the same people's works every time. :wink:

 

 

 

Anyway, about the jpg/png thing: that was only supposed to be a question about why he chose to use a jpg, for some reason I slipped in the png comment. Although, you can't deny that there are some clarity problems with jpgs compared to pngs (pixel or not).

 

 

 

Just the same, the pictures look good Zoidnerd, I'm sorry if my original comment suggested otherwise.

 

 

 

At any rate, zoid, could you have made the samples any more obnoxious? I can't comment on anything because I can't see anything.

 

That's what I meant by "The "SAMPLE" really hinders my ability to see the pictures as they are meant to be viewed."- I know what the sample is for, just it's very large.

[Zoidnerd]

soz i like sample, it accents their eyes