The Observer Posted July 31, 2007 Share Posted July 31, 2007 JAGeX already has this in place for a few randoms. Do you know what I'm talking about? I'm talking about changing the questions to random events! They do that to the classroom one I think (confirmation needed) and they should do it for every random event. For example: The Certers (Niles, Giles, Miles) should have their question changed every month or so. Macroers will have to adapt to every single change therefore there will be many "dry" periods where there are no macroers at all as they are stuck in the random events or stuck in an unknown location to them. Pretty soon, the dry periods will soon deter the macroers away and it will become less profitable making macroers history. Tell me what you think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RSBDavid Posted July 31, 2007 Share Posted July 31, 2007 there is basically no way to perm stop an autoer.. they"re like borg.. they'll adapt [software Engineer] - [Ability Bar Suggestion] - [Gaming Enthusiast] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sir_molk Posted July 31, 2007 Share Posted July 31, 2007 I'm sure that they always will find a way to macro, no matter what Jagex do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Primeaction Posted July 31, 2007 Share Posted July 31, 2007 You can't solve them this way by adding randoms. Read Scorpiona's post. It's really good. :thumbsup: Not all F2Pers are beggars or scammers, some are respected members, but these respected people are over-populated by these beggar and scammers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nomar04 Posted July 31, 2007 Share Posted July 31, 2007 Macroers can easily answer questions. The packet information is sent to them, with the answer attached to it. They do not just guess randomly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Observer Posted August 1, 2007 Author Share Posted August 1, 2007 What I mean is if they change the question every once in a while. For example: Instead of "what comes next" they will put "How many sheep are in this list?" The macroer programmers will have to compensate for that to make the macroers able to answer the questions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gonearctic1 Posted August 2, 2007 Share Posted August 2, 2007 there is basically no way to perm stop an autoer.. they"re like borg.. they'll adapt "We will assimilate you, Resistance is Futile" lol aorry but i had to do that also, ya the autoers and macroers are invincible and can never be stopped unless all of the worlds superpowers come together to nuke them all :XD: anyway good idea even though it wont help much =D> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Observer Posted August 4, 2007 Author Share Posted August 4, 2007 You people still don't understand. It takes time to adapt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scorpiona Posted August 5, 2007 Share Posted August 5, 2007 You can't solve them this way by adding randoms. Read Scorpiona's post. It's really good. :thumbsup: Thanks. :) Macroers can easily answer questions. The packet information is sent to them, with the answer attached to it. They do not just guess randomly. RS packet information has been encrypted for a LONG time, otherwise we'd have another AutoRune scandal. P.S. to whatever administrators run the censor: If you weren't aware, AutoRune has been dead for YEARS. Blocking its name serves no purpose other than infuriating people like me using its name for actual reference purposes. JAGeX already has this in place for a few randoms. Do you know what I'm talking about? I'm talking about changing the questions to random events! They do that to the classroom one I think (confirmation needed) and they should do it for every random event. For example: The Certers (Niles, Giles, Miles) should have their question changed every month or so. Macroers will have to adapt to every single change therefore there will be many "dry" periods where there are no macroers at all as they are stuck in the random events or stuck in an unknown location to them. Pretty soon, the dry periods will soon deter the macroers away and it will become less profitable making macroers history. Tell me what you think. Currently the users of the one popular colorclicking bot around now get most of their advanced RuneScape script commands from a function library known as the (BOTNAME) Resource Library. The BRL, as we'll call it, is managed by a considerably dedicated team of scripters who submit pre-written functions for doing tasks like solving macros, finding bank screens, moving inventory items, etc. By changing the macro solutions every month, all this would accomplish is padding the advertising revenue the BRL team gets from the monthly updates and forcing macroers to click "Update BRL Functions" every month before starting their scripts. Ex-cheater. Web designer, PHP programmer, security analyst, and occasional goat milker. ESCAPE WINDOWS! Dedicated poweruser of Ubuntu Linux. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bard_Bow_Man Posted August 5, 2007 Share Posted August 5, 2007 Just for the record, when macroers get stuck in an unfamiliar location, they usually use their home tele... We tried using an abyssal whip to 'suggest' they work faster Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scorpiona Posted August 5, 2007 Share Posted August 5, 2007 Just for the record, when macroers get stuck in an unfamiliar location, they usually use their home tele... I think you must've been looking at a skiller or summat. It might differ, but the main colorclicking bot around now has a "NextPlayer" system where the macroer adds a list of usernames and passwords of different macro accounts that are ready to do a task, like cutting yews, etc. Whenever one of the accounts has a problem, such as being stuck in a strange location, they just logout and switch to the next account in the NextPlayer queue. I've never heard of them using the home tele, although it could be specific to a different bot. EDIT: Spelling Ex-cheater. Web designer, PHP programmer, security analyst, and occasional goat milker. ESCAPE WINDOWS! Dedicated poweruser of Ubuntu Linux. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now