Whats this mean? (Tip.it Official Chat)

[Blue-To-Die]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

And what is up with us being able to add polls to threads in here but not in the General Board in RuneScape 3D? lol

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

:?: :?:

[runesmithie]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

And what is up with us being able to add polls to threads in here but not in the General Board in RuneScape 3D? lol

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

:?: :?:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Just keep trying and/or use a different client

[Blue-To-Die]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

And what is up with us being able to add polls to threads in here but not in the General Board in RuneScape 3D? lol

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

:?: :?:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Just keep trying and/or use a different client

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Are you, like, following me or something?? :shock:

[devilheart14]

eventually it will connect if you keep pushing connect might take quite a few goes some times thou

[Hannibal]

Or you could just use ChatZilla if you're using Firefox / Mozilla Suite, and if that doesn't work, try XChat or mIRC.

[runesmithie]

Or you could just use ChatZilla if you're using Firefox / Mozilla Suite, and if that doesn't work, try XChat or mIRC.

'

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Just... don't tell them you use ChatZilla <_<

[Hannibal]

 

Or you could just use ChatZilla if you're using Firefox / Mozilla Suite, and if that doesn't work, try XChat or mIRC.

'

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Just... don't tell them you use ChatZilla <_<

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I suppose that means I also shouldn't tell you I help developing ChatZilla - what's wrong with it, according to you?

[runesmithie]

 

 

Or you could just use ChatZilla if you're using Firefox / Mozilla Suite, and if that doesn't work, try XChat or mIRC.

'

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Just... don't tell them you use ChatZilla <_<

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I suppose that means I also shouldn't tell you I help developing ChatZilla - what's wrong with it, according to you?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nothing's wrong with it in my view...

 

 

 

They always tell me to get a manly IRC client in #stats :o

[Blue-To-Die]

 

 

 

Or you could just use ChatZilla if you're using Firefox / Mozilla Suite, and if that doesn't work, try XChat or mIRC.

'

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Just... don't tell them you use ChatZilla <_<

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I suppose that means I also shouldn't tell you I help developing ChatZilla - what's wrong with it, according to you?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nothing's wrong with it in my view...

 

 

 

They always tell me to get a manly IRC client in #stats :o

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ahh.... >_>

[battletrax]

 

 

 

Or you could just use ChatZilla if you're using Firefox / Mozilla Suite, and if that doesn't work, try XChat or mIRC.

'

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Just... don't tell them you use ChatZilla <_<

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I suppose that means I also shouldn't tell you I help developing ChatZilla - what's wrong with it, according to you?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nothing's wrong with it in my view...

 

 

 

They always tell me to get a manly IRC client in #stats :o

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I think that they are referring to B*tchX... Pure text-based, but still awesome :)

[runesmithie]

 

 

 

 

Or you could just use ChatZilla if you're using Firefox / Mozilla Suite, and if that doesn't work, try XChat or mIRC.

'

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Just... don't tell them you use ChatZilla <_<

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I suppose that means I also shouldn't tell you I help developing ChatZilla - what's wrong with it, according to you?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nothing's wrong with it in my view...

 

 

 

They always tell me to get a manly IRC client in #stats :o

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I think that they are referring to B*tchX... Pure text-based, but still awesome :)

 

 

 

No, sadly they are referring to mIRC =\

[Hannibal]

 

 

 

 

Or you could just use ChatZilla if you're using Firefox / Mozilla Suite, and if that doesn't work, try XChat or mIRC.

'

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Just... don't tell them you use ChatZilla <_<

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I suppose that means I also shouldn't tell you I help developing ChatZilla - what's wrong with it, according to you?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nothing's wrong with it in my view...

 

 

 

They always tell me to get a manly IRC client in #stats :o

 

 

 

No, sadly they are referring to mIRC =\

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tell them to get an IRC client which supports Unicode / UTF-8, a proper scripting language (not some messed up format like mIRCscript - not quoting strings = sucky) and which doesn't have so many security holes due to the bad security of the builtin dll and remote scripting support. (granted, most of those may/should be fixed by now, but boy, that was some junk...). Some support for standards (don't show CTCP replies by default) and especially web standards (send correct urls to browsers, don't leave off the protocol for no good reason). Then obviously, the url-linking mechanism itself can use work (matching arbitrary non-valid characters after urls, tsk tsk), and while we're at it, Khaled should consider building in some support for XPath, SVG, Canvas, XML, CSS-styled content area, streamlined menu's and preferences, not to mention just about every other Web Standard you can think of.

 

 

 

The last bit: tell them to stitch all that in a less-than-300k install package.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oh, and while we're at it, Khaled should consider open-sourcing it, too.

 

 

 

Hrmpf.

[Blue-To-Die]

 

 

 

 

 

Or you could just use ChatZilla if you're using Firefox / Mozilla Suite, and if that doesn't work, try XChat or mIRC.

'

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Just... don't tell them you use ChatZilla <_<

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I suppose that means I also shouldn't tell you I help developing ChatZilla - what's wrong with it, according to you?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nothing's wrong with it in my view...

 

 

 

They always tell me to get a manly IRC client in #stats :o

 

 

 

No, sadly they are referring to mIRC =\

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tell them to get an IRC client which supports Unicode / UTF-8, a proper scripting language (not some messed up format like mIRCscript - not quoting strings = sucky) and which doesn't have so many security holes due to the bad security of the builtin dll and remote scripting support. (granted, most of those may/should be fixed by now, but boy, that was some junk...). Some support for standards (don't show CTCP replies by default) and especially web standards (send correct urls to browsers, don't leave off the protocol for no good reason). Then obviously, the url-linking mechanism itself can use work (matching arbitrary non-valid characters after urls, tsk tsk), and while we're at it, Khaled should consider building in some support for XPath, SVG, Canvas, XML, CSS-styled content area, streamlined menu's and preferences, not to mention just about every other Web Standard you can think of.

 

 

 

The last bit: tell them to stitch all that in a less-than-300k install package.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oh, and while we're at it, Khaled should consider open-sourcing it, too.

 

 

 

Hrmpf.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oh god, I feel like the kid in the Peanuts Comic where the adults voices sound like, "nuh nuh nuhnuhn nuhn nuh..."

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

>_>