October 19, 200817 yr I have made many failed pures and know i am experienced and know wat i am doing for the most part. the only problem is that i just dont have time to train and getting str and range and even magic to level 70 is a great deal of work. with the new pvp worlds something gave me an idea. while testing it out a mage bashed me and killed me. it gave me an idea. make a pure that low leveled and has level 60magic. this will hit 16s at very low levels. and pretty fast to level. is this a good idea?
October 19, 200817 yr By "a pure that is low leveled and has 60 magic", I hope that your pure will have SOME hp. Dont bother with a 10hp 60 mage pure, they will get torn apart. Also, at 60 mage, training regularily with hp levels, you should be around lvl 39? or something, so if you take a few hp levels away from that, you will be around 35. Most rangers at that level will tear you apart if they have a decent (around 50) mage lvl (for mage def). IMHO, your best bet would be a range/2h'er with 1 pray and 1 def.
October 19, 200817 yr Author By "a pure that is low leveled and has 60 magic", I hope that your pure will have SOME hp. Dont bother with a 10hp 60 mage pure, they will get torn apart. Also, at 60 mage, training regularily with hp levels, you should be around lvl 39? or something, so if you take a few hp levels away from that, you will be around 35. Most rangers at that level will tear you apart if they have a decent (around 50) mage lvl (for mage def). IMHO, your best bet would be a range/2h'er with 1 pray and 1 def. who says the hp will be 10. it will be something like 30. and if i need more ill train range so it can be something like 40 err. idk. but it seems fast because imo magic and training trains much faster than str and is easier to train. it just costs money.
October 19, 200817 yr By "a pure that is low leveled and has 60 magic", I hope that your pure will have SOME hp. Dont bother with a 10hp 60 mage pure, they will get torn apart. Also, at 60 mage, training regularily with hp levels, you should be around lvl 39? or something, so if you take a few hp levels away from that, you will be around 35. Most rangers at that level will tear you apart if they have a decent (around 50) mage lvl (for mage def). IMHO, your best bet would be a range/2h'er with 1 pray and 1 def. who says the hp will be 10. it will be something like 30. and if i need more ill train range so it can be something like 40 err. idk. but it seems fast because imo magic and training trains much faster than str and is easier to train. it just costs money. Being a mage pure, your hp will be way too low, and you will have NO defence against rangers AND melee. And since a lot of pures use range/2h tactic, you will be ripped apart. Trust me, I have ripped apart MANY mage pures at my pure's levl (47), sometimes even if they safe a little, because range is too fast. Mage pures are good at low levels, but since you have to be at least 20 to enter pvp worlds, mages arent that effective anymore other than in a team.
October 21, 200817 yr Author By "a pure that is low leveled and has 60 magic", I hope that your pure will have SOME hp. Dont bother with a 10hp 60 mage pure, they will get torn apart. Also, at 60 mage, training regularily with hp levels, you should be around lvl 39? or something, so if you take a few hp levels away from that, you will be around 35. Most rangers at that level will tear you apart if they have a decent (around 50) mage lvl (for mage def). IMHO, your best bet would be a range/2h'er with 1 pray and 1 def. who says the hp will be 10. it will be something like 30. and if i need more ill train range so it can be something like 40 err. idk. but it seems fast because imo magic and training trains much faster than str and is easier to train. it just costs money. Being a mage pure, your hp will be way too low, and you will have NO defence against rangers AND melee. And since a lot of pures use range/2h tactic, you will be ripped apart. Trust me, I have ripped apart MANY mage pures at my pure's levl (47), sometimes even if they safe a little, because range is too fast. Mage pures are good at low levels, but since you have to be at least 20 to enter pvp worlds, mages arent that effective anymore other than in a team. yea but my combat will be 30ish
October 22, 200817 yr By "a pure that is low leveled and has 60 magic", I hope that your pure will have SOME hp. Dont bother with a 10hp 60 mage pure, they will get torn apart. Also, at 60 mage, training regularily with hp levels, you should be around lvl 39? or something, so if you take a few hp levels away from that, you will be around 35. Most rangers at that level will tear you apart if they have a decent (around 50) mage lvl (for mage def). IMHO, your best bet would be a range/2h'er with 1 pray and 1 def. who says the hp will be 10. it will be something like 30. and if i need more ill train range so it can be something like 40 err. idk. but it seems fast because imo magic and training trains much faster than str and is easier to train. it just costs money. Being a mage pure, your hp will be way too low, and you will have NO defence against rangers AND melee. And since a lot of pures use range/2h tactic, you will be ripped apart. Trust me, I have ripped apart MANY mage pures at my pure's levl (47), sometimes even if they safe a little, because range is too fast. Mage pures are good at low levels, but since you have to be at least 20 to enter pvp worlds, mages arent that effective anymore other than in a team. yea but my combat will be 30ish Still wont be good enough, your low hp will get ripped apart, and mage is too slow to be effective. But you could try, and if you like it, train ranged on it, then use range/mage, those kinds are pretty effective as well.
Create an account or sign in to comment