I normally finish court cases in one or two attemps, but I'm having real trouble with the River Troll one. I'm defending the River Troll.

 

I can get the jury to agree with my argument four times with the following:

• Evidence: Raw Fish - Troll was found eating the fish.
• Evidence: Spinich Roll - This is not a natural food for Trolls
• Witness: River Troll - Fishermen are attacking troll OR Fisherman are stealing troll's fish. (both produce the same result)
• Witness: Arresting Officer - Catherby is a popular fishing spot, so fisherman could be dropping all the litter.

 

 

Nothing else seems to get the jury to agree with my argument, but I could be missing something. The Jury members I've tried to appeal to so far have been:

• Shady Individual.
• Shady Citizen.
• Mage
• Elderly Gentleman (I thought I was proscuting at first, for some bizzare reason).

Does anybody know where I'm going wrong?

 

Thanks in advance for any help provided!

 

 

* Present the raw fish as evidence. Say "The accused was found eating this fish."

* Present the spinach rolls as evidence. Say "This is not a common food for trolls."

* Present the half-key as evidence. Say "This was found next to the river troll."

* Call the arresting officer to the stand. Ask him about the "Arrest."

* Call the river troll to the stand. Ask him about "Catherby."

* Direct the closing statement at the barbarian.

Thank you so much for the help! A few of those things you mentioned I switched with other options, but I never thought of present the Half-Key as evidence in that way.