May 23, 201214 yr Maybe you should have a look at AV comparatives. I think the simple fact that Norton isn't listed at all doesn't meet their requirements. I think that's enough to say that it's not a good antivirus.
May 24, 201214 yr Maybe you should have a look at AV comparatives. I think the simple fact that Norton isn't listed at all doesn't meet their requirements. I think that's enough to say that it's not a good antivirus. That's a pretty large assumption there to be "a simple fact", especially if you actually read the notes of the reports that Symantec specifically requested not to be included in the analysis. In previous reports however, they have consistently performed at AV-comparative's Advanced or Advanced+ tiers. Before you jump the gun as to why Symantec opted out of the analysis, there are plenty of potential reasons, none of which conclusively state why it's not a good piece of software. Trend Micro has also historically been a fairly strong competitor, but has also opted out of recent analyses. Something to fill my sig with until I find a replacement.Also check out my blug
Create an account or sign in to comment