CC

[Qwality]

I just made this sig, it's only my second ever in PS (although I have made alot in gimp/fireworks) Tell me what you think

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

V1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

V2 (With rose petals and border)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CC Please

[eckered]

i think this topipc is going to get locked because mxm doesnt like anything explicit... lol...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

great job of blending the render, but you need to work on yoru light source. try using c4d's to help add depth. also, add a border. text is good, and so is its placement. also, i think you should try geetting some brushes, coz those help a ton lol... i also think that your bg needs more color. try blending the fan thing at her side, and her left (our right) arm a bit more.

[Qwality]

ok thx for the cc

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

but if I even have to ask myself if the sig is too explicit to put on the forums I will ask a mod, I don't see where you're coming from when you say this is too explicit

[X_Seismic_X]

I don't think it's explicit enough to get locked :P.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nice sig, I think either darken the petals or remove them completely, at the moment the one without is nicer. Good job though :).

[cadburys_egg]

i think this topipc is going to get locked because mxm doesnt like anything explicit... lol...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

great job of blending the render, but you need to work on yoru light source. try using c4d's to help add depth. also, add a border. text is good, and so is its placement. also, i think you should try geetting some brushes, coz those help a ton lol... i also think that your bg needs more color. try blending the fan thing at her side, and her left (our right) arm a bit more.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Do you know what you mean? It just sounds like you got a bunch of buzzwords and put them into a paragraph.

 

 

 

• - I see no blending. If it is, it's minimal.
   
   
   
  - Light source, yes. Try centering it behind the render.
   
   
   
  - C4Ds for this? I think not. They don't always add depth either. This doesn't need C4Ds.
   
   
   
  - Text placement is good. Text font is nasty. It doesn't match very well. It's a soft render, why has it got sharp text? Also, make it about 60~80% of what it is now, it doesn't need all of the space.
   
   
   
  - Now I know you're just using buzzwords. It is brushed. Just not very effectively. Use gradients to help focus. It's also not a case of getting brushes, but knowing how to use them.
   
   
   
  - Yeah, BG needs more colour. Something like the roser petals would do good. But in my opinion... lose the petals or put them to a low opacity ( by low I mean like 10~30%) behind the render.
   
   
   
  - As I said before, there's little to no blending.

 

 

 

If you're going to give someone CC atleast let it be helpful CC and not just what everyone else says for other people...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I don't think it's explicit enough to get locked

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Borderline methinks.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nice sig, I think either darken the petals or remove them completely, at the moment the one without is nicer.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Not darken, just lower the opacity.

[Liquid_Morph]

i think this topipc is going to get locked because mxm doesnt like anything explicit... lol...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

great job of blending the render, but you need to work on yoru light source. try using c4d's to help add depth. also, add a border. text is good, and so is its placement. also, i think you should try geetting some brushes, coz those help a ton lol... i also think that your bg needs more color. try blending the fan thing at her side, and her left (our right) arm a bit more.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

You have no clue what your talking about.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

• [*:2lmg8p3p] It is no where near explicit, oh dear you can see a fraction of her underwear, omg it's p0rn?!? :roll:
   
   
   
  [*:2lmg8p3p] Light Source - Agreed.
   
   
   
  [*:2lmg8p3p] C4Ds to add depth...ok, you have no clue what your talking about. C4D does not add depth, for depth, you need to make it look more of life-like, darken areas, creating a light source, focal points, all adds up and creates good flow and depth.
   
   
   
  [*:2lmg8p3p] Not every sig needs a border.
   
   
   
  [*:2lmg8p3p] Text Comment - Agreed.
   
   
   
  [*:2lmg8p3p] Erm, he has used brushes, and he's come out with a great simple effect, not everyone brush-[bleep] like an amateur (if that) with a stupid over-contrasted outcome.
   
   
   
  [*:2lmg8p3p] No, his background doesn't need more colour. I call this simplicity and originality, it's great, all it needs is better lighting and maybe some other various effects.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

But yeah, I'll quit now and just help C/C Qwality. Now, Qwality, I can see you have took the tips I gave you into consideration and the outcome is great! It's not one of those normal brush-wh0red and over-contrasted sigs, you have good colour, just work on the blending and lighting more.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The font is nice, but, it doesn't suit the render. The render seems calm and more of a flow, the font is nice yes but not suitable. Try a simple font like Century Gothic and also place the text more closer to the render and make it look apart of the sig and not just there for the sake of it.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Your petal-effect sig is great, all I would recommend is just lower the opacity of the petals, or even more-so on the petals that cross the render, it's a great flow you have there!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

But yeah, overall, it's a great sig and I like some of the tips you've taken and put them in a good sig, just work on your lighting, blending and depth.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Keep going man! :thumbsup:

[Qwality]

thanks for all the CC guys, and Liquid thanks for all your help, your tips helped me alot :thumbsup: That tip with the lighting (adding the black lines and stuff) helped me alot with my lighting, althought it still needs alot of work like you all alrdy said :XD: