Michael

Wouldn't happen if the map rotation was bigger than 8 maps.

Exaclty, its more of an anoyance than anything, just something for less skilled players to use if they suck. In the times when being 10th prestige rank 55 I'd run around with Juggernaught on, double annoyance for most people.

I use juggernaught sometimes, just to annoy.

Bad Company had destructible terrain to a point, it worked well for the most part, until a team mate destroys your cover and leaves you completely out in the open.

I dunno about you but I prefer not to be startled, and class it along with getting scared.

Mines 1.8 something.

Up close an SMG should beat a rifle, across range is where a rifle should win.

Actually, everyone with an xbox/ps3/pc still hates the game and prefers cod4 over it. Almost everyone who still posts in this thread plays it on the Wii, hence why they like it. I only play for Zombie mode, if I want to play online I don't play COD5.

It's easy, I've gotten 93-15 with the SVT-40 on Courtyard.

Well as it's a clan, I'd think they'd be playing HC S&D so try that.

Hosts in COD4 and COD5 are picked by whoever has the lowest ping to a server that is in America somewhere, just because someone has a low ping to that server doesn't mean they can host a full 6 v 6 game. The system is flawed.

On the rare occasion that I'm on waw and not playing nazi zombies my class is usually MP40 with martyrdom. If you run on my corpse after I die, you deserve the dearth. Usually I wouldn't use martyrdom but I feel that as practically everyone else uses cheap perks and guns I'm not going to disadvantage myself by refusing to use a few guns/perks.

I got to wave 21 on Verruckt again, this time at 500 kills and 100k+ score.

So? Sony created and popularised an entire new format. Blu Ray quadrupled the amount of data developers can put onto discs. Not to mention Blu Ray movies. I wouldn't call the best, most supported, most used, most active network with the best connestivity "nothing more than a server". Especially compared to the Wii where you cant even talk to others without buying Wii speak, or play your freinds without entering a 12 digit code. Admittedly it can't sell Zune, but then what can? I see more advertisements and games for the Wii than the PS3 and Xbox put together. If you're referring to me I did not create that thread. Actually this shows good judgement on there part as they don't waste their time developing an inferior version. I have more than 2 days play time on WaW. I still dip back into it from time to time, and I play Zombies often. _ Ray I dont have a problem with with WaW or indeed WaW vs COD4, or the Wii vs Xbox/PS3, what I do have a problem with is you saying things that are either simply untrue or that you have no knowledge of. [/hide] Alright, TheValeyard and Mc, get the [bleep] off this thread. Seriously, nobody cares what you think and all you are causing is trolling and stupid arguments. You don't have to start arguing with me, you can talk about it rationally rather than flying off the handle and starting swearing. I have every right to post my opinion on this thread.

Collateral Damage is such an easy challenge to get if you snipe often.

Checked out a stupid thread and found this; made by the CoD4 mega-fanboy. You do notice everyone backing up CoD5 are the people with the Wii's right? Infinity Ward suck SO bad they cant even make a Wii port of it, or get another company to help out do it -.- Btw Valeyard, you're like the only person who posts in this thread who doesnt still / has played 5. So why dont you shut the [bleep] up and go back to 4's thread, and leave us be? The only reason I posted in 4 was because you were being a flamebait douche. [bleep] off. If Infinity Ward suck why is your beloved COD:WAW built of the IF engine?

You should use M9 with MP5, you get some extra ammo.

The controls themselves are reason enough - the Wii could be the first step to those games you see in futuristic shows that show people putting on suits and fighting people. In their current form the controls are not superior, their just different. So the console's potential is only to lead to other consoles in the (most likely distant) future? That could be said about the other 2 as well, e.g the PS3 has brought Blu Ray meaning more data will be able to be stored on discs in future consoles, the 360 brought the idea of a strong unified online service, acheivements, etc. I find that the main problem is that Nintendo refuses to orient it towards serious gamers. With a bteter online system, the Wii would be amazing. Nintendo need to ditch the friend code system or make it one code per system.

I asked for reasons why the Wii has potential, you have yet to say anything of the sort. Is this because you can't think of any, or just simply because it doesn't have any more potential than the other 2 consoles?

Give me reasons why the Wii has the most potential, if you can't, shut up and stop being such an ignorant child about it.

Overgrown is an easy map to spot snipers in the grass, most of the time I out snipe people pronging in the grass.

I agree, same here. But it seems to be the Wii players that are the ones always complaining about lack of maps, or campers, or overpowered guns. That's because no one seems to want to give the Wii a chance when realistically it's the system with the most potential. So much potential that there's no space for patches or updates?

I couldn't care less about the time period it's set in. For a game like COD that isn't really relevant to the multiplayer. What makes me prefer COD4 over WAW is the maps and the better gun balancing, albeit not much more balancing but the different selection of guns is more appealing.

Me and my friends play a game we call one burst when we use the M16, the aim is for every kill you get with the gun to be a 1 burst kill. Fun for us but not sure about the enemy team.

/ Modded controller. You don't need a modded controller to use the G3 good.