The irony is, whenever people who oppose price manipulation bring up history or any real-world comparisons, we're told that we are not allowed to compare the real world to a video game, and that we are just taking this game way too seriously. So we start from the 90s? dot-com bubble and burst, Enron scandals, and hedge funds turning a housing problem into a global recession. If you are willing to look back any further you will see that the America-esque, capitalist market has laws prohibiting the same practices, because it disrupts supply and demand as well as competition. Hah, got me there, I meant to start the general search beginning in the 1900s, rather 1990. You do bring up perfectly valid points, though, I'll pry a bit deeper here. Real people will dictate a society which closely fits their own, game or not. There are real people behind all those skills, and usernames, which, as stated, means that the basic economy will tend to conform to an existing one, rather than creating something unique. Thus, the statement which dictates we cannot compare RS to reality, is nigh. Furthermore, while I do wish to place the basis of my argument around the 1900s, one can argue that Runescape takes place in a medieval era, in which such a market would probably exist. Similarly, with constraints on the way we transfer wealth, rural forms of trade, including bartering, and small-business sales, are essentially rendered unavailable, which strains the basic economy. In terms of merchant clans, it's a completely valid method of marketing, again. I don't think I could call what they're doing a "monopoly," nor would any merchant clan actions fall under the jurisdiction of the Sherman Act. Wal-mart would surely have been cracked down on by now if that were the case. Additionally, the Sherman Act only accounts for actions after 1890, If I'm to be wrong regarding the above statements, in which any activities before hand would have surely fallen within the timeframe, and current economic situation Runescape is in. Furthermore, no laws are in effect controlling general trade, there is no state interfering, this is not a command economy, communism is similarly out of the question. Players are free to do what they see fit, which is the basis of Capitalism, and there is no one to interfere with their activities, if not even a bit, which is the basis of Laissez-Faire. Feel free to criticize me some more.