Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Tip.It Forum

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

The_Mather1

Members
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by The_Mather1

  1. [spoiler=Income] Population 26 700 000 Avarage income $125 000 Tax level 45 % Tax income $1 501 875 000 000 Spendable $15 018 750 000
  2. But then how would I type? Like this:
  3. LHC = Large Hadron Collider.
  4. Ross, the shade would have been dead had you not disallowed my electro-nuclear reaction.
  5. Scandinavia, or more accuratly SAAB, offers to help with the tank. (You should accept, who'd know how to better make it RPG-proof than a RPG producer?)
  6. Scandinavia launches a probe to Titan.
  7. Let's just say no research or production is to be conducted while inside dialation (they couldn't anyways due to power/resource demands), and that there'll never be enough energy available to acelerate above 100,000 times normal time. It'll only be a manner of speeding up travell and similiar things (for example lowering the travell time to Mars).
  8. It's effectiveness is to be decided by the power it is provided with, so if hooked up to a gasoline generator each second would be 0.0001 times faster or slower or when hooked up to a nuclear powerplant it would be 1000 times faster. Also it is researched at SIRO TEMP so anyone can join in.
  9. I'm trying to amplify it as well. :wall: Let's say point A is Earth and point B is a shuttle, when deactivated 1s in point A is the same as in point B, but when active one second in point A is the same as one thousand seconds (or 1/1000 second) in point B, alowing point B to advance faster (or slower) through time without changing it. Even though time is faster in point B than in point A it is still not altered.
  10. That is the exact thing I'm researching, I'm trying to do that on pourpose and possibly reversed.
  11. I'm not manipulating it, I'm causing it to appear faster or slower in small areas, basically I'm causing an abnormality that apears in nature with an outcome making neither normal time or the dialated manipulated, only different. Imagine a plane seemingly flying in mach 10, but when you're inside it it seems only to cruise at normal speed while the outside world is going slow-motion. Also emulating means achieving something already existing through new means (most comonly using a different device). Which again means you cannot ban it due to it being a natural effect caused when wanted through the use of an allready know side-effect
  12. Not time travell, emulation and reversing of a natural effect caused to objects due to high velocities.
  13. The_Mather1 replied to Nero's topic in Falador Tavern
    Not time travell, time dialation, speeding up/slowing down time within a localized area, kinda like what astronauts experience upon re-entry only more potent.
  14. The_Mather1 replied to Nero's topic in Falador Tavern
    What part of localized field was it you didn't understand?
  15. The_Mather1 replied to Nero's topic in Falador Tavern
    No one complained when I started researching time dialation, anyways it isn't impossible; by increasing/decreasing the speed of light within a localized field through the use of (EM/alpha) radiation one could emulate the (opposite of the) speeds required.
  16. The_Mather1 replied to Nero's topic in Falador Tavern
    Scandinavia would be... well.. Norway, only fully monarchy. On techs it would start by enchancing saltpower and fixing the global warming then have sea colonization, anti stealth systems and stealth fighters, third it would have both normal and reverse time-dialation.
  17. Just do this in excell: Population: [population number] Avarage income: [avarage income] Tax: [tax percentage] Tax income: =A2*A5*A8 [whatever you want to add here in between] GDP: =A11+[whatever else] Spendables: =A16(or whatever GDP value is on)/100
  18. You know there's a tool for doing that Archi, it's called Excell, I've been using it since before you came along.
  19. Why? I gave them of the money owned by the governement, not fresh from a mint. Sorry for trying to make it simpler guys, thought you'd prefer I made something showing my current income and such so that I couldn't cheat.
  20. Tax income (here representing the entire GDP for the sake of simplicity) is one hundred times the "leftovers". Giving all households 100,000 NOK, wouldn't/didn't lower economy, only give beople a chance to get back on their feet or buy something they need.
  21. No way you're average gdp is 125,000. Even if you just controlled Norway, that'd be a 150% increase. (I'm talking about Purchasing Power Parity, not Nominal). If we're talking about nominal, that's a 300% increase for sweden, and around a 60% increase for norway, and a 300% increase for Finland as well. Also, most people wouldn't stand for 45% tax. Also, your gdp went from roughly 1 trillion to over 3.2 trillion. That means an 8% increase per year, and considering we were yelling at retech over 5%... What I ended up with as tax income is just a few b above the total gdp of my countries so it isn't so mouch increased from 2009 gdp, unless you want me to go complicated with companies and such I'll go with it. Um, yeah it is, it's a huge increase. That's like the US getting 13 trillion in tax revenue each year, and saying it's not that big an increase. The fact is, you increased at 8% per year, which is way too much. Considdering I gave people money earlier to get their standards up I guess it's fair, that and I "had to" get round numbers. As for tax level it's about the one that's now (IRL) if you add just three percent to "represent" the wealth tax.
  22. No way you're average gdp is 125,000. Even if you just controlled Norway, that'd be a 150% increase. (I'm talking about Purchasing Power Parity, not Nominal). If we're talking about nominal, that's a 300% increase for sweden, and around a 60% increase for norway, and a 300% increase for Finland as well. Also, most people wouldn't stand for 45% tax. Also, your gdp went from roughly 1 trillion to over 3.2 trillion. That means an 8% increase per year, and considering we were yelling at retech over 5%... What I ended up with as tax income is just a few b above the total gdp of my countries so it isn't so mouch increased from 2009 gdp, unless you want me to go complicated with companies and such I'll go with it.
  23. I'll do the income thing again, this enabling me to actually keep track of increased population, etc: [spoiler=Income]Population 25 668 300 Avarage income $125 000 Tax level 45 % Tax income $1 443 841 875 000 Spendable $14 438 418 750
  24. Meh, the principle I'm basing it on would be helpful anyways, think a way to emulate the opposite effect of time dialation. :thumbsup:

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.