Jump to content

@Dan3HitU

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    2180

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by @Dan3HitU

    OG Blog: Tradition and Challenge

    in General Discussion

    Posted

    I'm also guessing defence levels of new pure builds (old being 20/30/45 etc) will be based on which defence level gives the most effective armour but remains a low level. Like if 56 def for example had armour nearly as good as the max stuff, we'd see 56 def pures crop up with a new name based on the armour.

    Agreed.

    OG Blog: Tradition and Challenge

    in General Discussion

    Posted

    Seems to me like this favours pures. At least ones who are completely maxed.

    I thought that, but only to very low Defence ones (ie; 1).

     

    However, I'm sure there will be some reasoning to this, maybe this hidden thing (including something truly amazing that weve been keeping as a surprise) is some sort of item that changes or adds benefits depending on your actual levels, so it'd be different for each players account (unless they have the same stats).

     

    Also, I think maybe the way they'll counter what I've said at the beginning, is by having life-point boosting armours, all require certain levels, give good bonuses.

    Example:

    Level 102 maxed pure with Iron Armour will have maybe 100 added life points.

    Where as say an average player with say 50 average stats will be able to wear Granite with a guess of 500 added life points.

     

    This is just completely something I've thought off the top of my head, so it probably won't be right at all lol.

    The Crucible 19-06-12

    in General Discussion

    Posted

    So basically this is a less useful, members only version of Bounty Hunter? <_<

     

    So apparently this update ties players based on their damage-output skilss (Strength, range and mage) rather than combat level like all previous PvP minigames.

    Pures are having a hissy fit they're regularly tied to maxed players as targets.

    Isn't this how the combat update is going to start calculating combat level anyway? They better start getting used to it I guess.

    Honestly, I think it's a good idea, I mean, its your fault (and mine) if you don't train Defence.

    The Evolution of Combat: BETA discussion

    in General Discussion

    Posted

    Hahaha... they are probably gonna be increasing the cap to 120 on combat skills,

    yeah they said they "wouldn't do it/have no plans to." But has that been stopping them lately? After the first BXP weekend they said they had no plans for another...

    then there's the Squeal, Jcoins, the new discontinued item... just sayin'

    I don't think that would ever happen, I think if any of them were to be raised, it would only be Constitution.

    The Evolution of Combat: BETA discussion

    in General Discussion

    Posted

    Not sure if I'm pulling this out of the air or not, but I think I heard on a youtube video/read somewhere that combat levels would be changed reflecting on the gear that a player wears at the time of combat? Can't remember where I heard it though :(

    I've heard that too (I think it was a rumour I heard though, not a video), I've also heard there will be no such thing as "combat levels" outside of combat-zones (meaning they won't appear, it'll just be the persons username).

     

    I have no idea.

    Personally, I'd like them to completely revamp it, I mean, it's totally unfair really the way you can "over power" at certain combat levels.

     

    Maybe they'll do-away with attack/defence/strength levels (they only work when not wearing weapons/armours) and your overall level will be determined in what weapon/armour you have, which means you technically could be level 3 (1 att, def, str) but have the best gear, giving you a "visible" higher combat level, I think that'd be quite interesting.

     

    Or, armour reflects your defence level, the higher it is, the better the armour becomes, same with attack, hopefully this would stop people having low-defence and low-attack.

    So, I finally got hacked

    in Help and Advice

    Posted

    Maybe someone recovered your account like they did me.

     

    My password was hugely long and numbers/letters (no one could guess it). I was inactive for a long time and never logged on.

     

    The only logical explanation for it is; someone found out information about me and over a long amount of time (somehow) and recovered the account, however, I personally think the Jagex recovery system is simply not really controlled by humans, I think if loads of attempts are made it will eventually give in and give you access.

     

    I tried asking Jagex for more information regarding when the person took over access of my account and all the information I got back from them was something along these lines.

     

    --> They must know a lot about you.

    May-11-2012 - The Evolution of Combat

    in General Discussion

    Posted

    I don't think these changes will make much difference at all, unless Jagex changes how the hitting system works (my opinion: basically luck-based).

     

    As for the first BETA mention, I think they mean "update", several players have had the chance to BETA test certain things but this is the first public one (as RS2 was an entirely new (sort of) game).

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.

  I accept