basaltm

yes..it does seem to be 28 confirmed: 93 range - 28

ok ok in so many ways a power amulet just owns a str ammy.... gives attack and defence bonus, whilst only 4 less strength? well this is the popular opinion and I accept that.. however..my personal view is this..the attack bonus of f2p weapons is so low anyway, a +6 does make a difference..but it seems that you may hit your opponent 10% more often. A strength amulet obviously wont give you this bonus, but it makes you hit about 5% harder than a power amulet would.. depends on the character build..you simply cannot claim a power amulet is better for all players. Im 80 attack, 91 strength and 75 defence..I much prefer using a strength amulet in free to play due to the fact it allows me to hit 19 with rune scim without prayer or a str pot.. I also use a str ammy in members because it means I can hit 30 with abby whip no pray or pot too..(because of my gear) and barrows gloves and rune defender make up for the loss in attack. For me, str ammy..but I can see why many prefer power amulet. =]

hey im new, I know I havent properly introduced myself but I read the thread and thought I'd take a look... I agree, unlikely that rune arrows will become f2p as they are so much more powerful, with eagle eye prayer, and 99 ranged, the maximum ranged hit would be 22 or thereabouts, compared with 18 with adamant arrows. This would give rangers a disproportionate advantage to melee and magic. However, I do personally think that better bolts should be available to free players..|I think iron bolts should be available as they are significantly more powerful than bronze, but require very high range to hit hard. 80 range hits about 15 with them, maybe 17 with eagle eye (obviously enchanted version would stay members) what do you think?