VEGHATERMEATLOVER

I can only give you people at the moment however these people are hard workers because money is bieng given to them once they complete the task set for them, this is unspecified but rumored to be large. The people are 100,000 people selected from construction sites around China.

ICU, I'll help you. I'll send 50,000 men armed with cement mixers, shovels and bricks.

No there not, there about 80 billion pounds armed and moralized by the fact that they can get back the stuff they lost.

No, attacking Ross was what got me invaded, Trol just lept at the chanch to nick something. Bloody hell it's got no money in it. I'll just take the part of China that Rocco left.

Trol, I have a bigger miltary then you so I still take it.

God fantastic. Archi, I've taken Mongolia and the place where Rocco left?

GDP is fairer. How is something worked out by an unbiased moderator fairer if its worked one way or another? because infastructure can be deterioted in seconds, and due to the system bieng wrong Japan and America can pretty much do whatever. Also your statement below contradicts this How is GDP easier to calculate? You have to estimate the effects of your improvements to infrastructure, you don't have definitive numbers. people x Money people earn Realism. Yeah. Cause China would totally tell Iran IRL to let them put some nukes in their cities of they'd blow them up. Everything in this game is sure realistic! buidlings don't make money IRL and using blackmail to try and create a puppet nation isn't unreal[, I'd you want unrealism I start research on an improbabilty machine

Changed. Reasons for GDP. Realistic. Easy to calcualate. Can be unserstood if someone is cheating. Overall fairer. Also, My soldiers all attack Mongolia and enter Rocco's place where he retreated. No miltary is I'm that part of china so I just needntocreach out and grab it.

5v6. Basically. And some people haven't voted. GDP's simple and a bit more realistic. Also people mean nothing and in real life buildings mean not much in comparison to humans.

My soldiers all attack Mongolia and enter Rocco's place where he retreated. No miltary is I'm that part of china so I just needntocreach out and grab it.

When did we ever have GDP per capita? It's problematic because you can just start spamming people. All the previous hegemonys. We just have a growth rate which Archi can decide. And we can minimise it slightly so condom ban could add 0.3 birth rate with a maximum of 10. We used GDP. Population growth doesn't naturally increase GDP, so if we linked it to GDP per capita, then it would simply be a matter of population growth. No, jobs increase GDP. I belive that we should first work with smaller figures and second if we choose to do GDP we choose only 40% of the populationS

When did we ever have GDP per capita? It's problematic because you can just start spamming people. All the previous hegemonys. We just have a growth rate which Archi can decide. And we can minimise it slightly so condom ban could add 0.3 birth rate with a maximum of 10.

Archi, can I please request a poll? IAG as we have now. or GDP as we had before. Countrys with higher populations start with lower GDP per capita and vice versatile.

Could I take a technological hit? Take nerve study and Archimedes back five years?

Lol Ross, you've already got your 50 metre deep tungsten Walls with guns and plasma windows and whtever else lol. But yeh, Mather. Seriously. I was asking you to please be helpful and you posted information spitefully which to be honest is pretty pathetic. Now, I actually think we should go back to our old GDP system because that was fair and a lot easier to work out. GDP was good because it didn't mean we just went buidlings and weapons, we actually had a bit of a complex economy going, it didn't have a single hole in it either. And large countryside like America, India or China couldn't benefit due to having mainly farming and other crappy jobs. Does anyone agree? Also, people do work not buildings.

Ross, Ill cancel one research project and add five to another?

So whats my new IAG?

Archimage, with my area and funding 1 trillion into infastructure how much is my IAG?

And Americans 'capital punishment' (AKA Hypocritical murder) is cruelty, and they say waterboarding isn't torture. Disgusting. I disagree with the America on most issues. Y'no, I reckon China has a better human rights record. And whats more annoying is those damn traitor Americans who fought the war of independace.

Oppression of populace is almost never a good option. I don't think you understand that. Opression is fantastic if done right. Edit: for the leaders.

Fill it with a poison so if someone trys to break it there put in a catonic state and the police is alerted to see if the person was trying to get rid of it?

Trol, because until ten years I haven't lost any money until the next ten years, so I continue what I'm doing. Retech, Archi said to me that whatever I said then would mean that's what I had due to confusion. I gave all four bombs to Dusty.

.5 trillion, which is about 60-70% of it. Edit, infact - one trillion, about 90% of my money. Rest goes to food.

Thats a bit expensive for a city! In real life I assume its much less then one trillion, i'd say with 100 billion you could still make a pretty nice city. Whats my infastructure increase? From .3?

No way you have .5 trillion to spend, and no way mongolia would join you. It'd be like Afghanistan deciding to join Russia right after the fall of the USSR. Yeh, i'm China - I have that sort of money. And Doom, are we playing all countrys as complexly as we do ours, countrys are like empty shells in this game. Archi, if I spend more on infastructure I get more citys right?