Faux

Does it really have that option? I would think that's bad entertainment. A family of five will have food on the table for dinner. That's all that matters. It wasn't an argument

Culture shock!

Yes, the difference is that we are intelligent compared to them. Well the rooster always has the option of just standing there and take the beating. That could be considered suicide.

I've been doing a 5x5 variation. I think I should go back to the 3x10 I used to do

This thread could be considered humans vs. animals. Humans vs. humans is a totally different thing. Humans are not on the same level as animals. I wish people would stop contrasting each other.

Agreed. Why do people keep putting them in the same level?

The same place where you get the right to eat slaughtered animals. Unless you're a vegan who wholly defies exploitation of animals, you can't really ask that question. As someone earlier said....it was something along the lines of "Food is one thing this is another" Now, as for my own point...when an animal is slaughtered it is quick and painless...this however is cruelty (you know slow and painful possibly leading to death) and it is my belief that anyone who finds this entertaining is nothing short of at least 90% sadistic Oh yeah and dominance? Ok all you Americans out there, feel free to start a new sport. It's called "non-American hunting". The goal is to hunt down and kill as many foreigners as possible, or capture them. The captured ones will then be pitted against each other in a fight to entertain you......fun? Of course it is. Cruel? No! And the right for this is....you are the most powerful country in the world! Same thing, different context You really think that when animals get slaughtered, it's quick and painless? No man. I've seen goats, cows, pigs, chickens, get slaughtered. The only way it can be quick and painless is if you shoot them in the head. How many do slaughterhouses do you think wastes a bullet for each? Pretty much none. When you slaughter an animal, you rip the jugular first and they slowly die. There is nothing quick or painless about that.

Only if you lose. Oh man the feeling of your own chicken winning.... not that I have any first hand experiences. Just the notion of it.

The same place where you get the right to eat slaughtered animals. Unless you're a vegan who wholly defies exploitation of animals, you can't really ask that question.

Yes

Lol, so because you think it's wrong makes it absolute? Should everything that happens in the world depend on your definition of what is right or wrong? You asked him for his thoughts. He gave them to you. Whether they are properly backed remains to be seen, but they are his thoughts and he did not label them as absolutes. I already said a few pages back that I'm not trying to change anyone's mind. I'm just doing this for the sake of discussion.

Lol, so because you think it's wrong makes it absolute? Should everything that happens in the world depend on your definition of what is right or wrong?

Chicken is a food, but not all food is chicken. We eat chicken because we like it, because it's convenient, not because we have to. Not all entertainment is cockfighting. Now are you just trolling me? You just made my point. If we can choose to eat chicken, we can choose to watch cockfighting.

Bingo, that opinion has nothing to do with your argument. It's a fallacy to even bring it up.

Chicken is a food, but not all food is chicken. We eat chicken because we like it, because it's convenient, not because we have to.

Okay without bringing up any type of religion, what suggests that we must survive? I've responded to this. I guess you missed it: Learn to differentiate then. Humans don't have to survive. Humans want to survive. Figure out which one is fact and opinion.

I'm not religious.

Human survival is not an opinion. We have to do it. We eat chickens because we choose to. When someone is dying from starvation, he goes "ohh im dying i need food." Not "oh im dying i need chicken"

human survival is an instinct. not an opinion.

Food is a necessity. Eating chicken is a choice.

cockfights are legal

I don't know, I've never seen one nor do I have any experiences with dogfighting.

That's an opinion, not a fact. Most people have an "out of sight, out of mind" mantra that allows them to be against cockfights but can't care less about how the food on their plate came by. Unless you can prove to me that eating chicken is a life or death situation, relating it to "human life" is a load of [cabbage].

Lol, game[roosters] are probably treated better than the chickens in slaughterhouses. People won't believe it... but it's true. These roosters aren't confined to small spaces, force fed, etc. They are prizefighters. They have decent cages. Made sure to be healthy every single day through food, check ups, meds etc. There's nothing humane about this

Oh please. Ever heard of countries like Spain and Portugal? Bullfighting is considered a grand spectacle. Unless of course you find these countries to be uncivilized...