Zaaps1

ok FIRST THINGS FIRST WE NEED A PLOT anyone have any ideas?

green i bet

i am leader of harpie military not leader of harpie artistic talent :( but if we work on it as a group effort, im sure we will prevail it can feature ur fellow harpies, zilyana and astea going at it

no ur a beautiful, strong harpie who dont need no man

cuz u didnt do ur pushups yet i am harsh harpie general, but i am fair u do ur push ups and ur good2go

i recruit my own soldiers for my army i AM the harpie military now k? and as my first order i want greens to give me 20 push ups

wanna-be blog with wanna-be spam

so its settled then? plus im good at spamming posts look at my post count they dont call me TROLL general for no reason! in fact, i should be named harpie general

i am no proclaiming myself as king objections?

i like these roles

im recruiter u spastic and sonic is linguist k4ylan is now priest

i like it, ur hired i still want that list tho, and as official harpie janitor, its your job, greens.

someone please make a list of all current harpies and their designated roles pls

you cant marry a harpie until theres an official harpie church established

*considers member's loyalty points system* probably

>26 defense >what type of pure? obviously rune pure also 87 running around the circles@@@@ BUT I TRAIN BY JUMPING ON A ROPE AND TALKING TO OLD STONE MEN INSTEAD

but ltk has 0 PP in both

eddy?

Doesn't that kind of defeat the purpose of... I don't know... Every game on the planet? Every MMO at least. Sort of. Nah, I'd say every game on the planet. (This post isn't directly at you, Kimberly, or Wicked, but Firedruid and the point he made.) How many popular video games or online games do you know of that don't have some sort of leaderboard or highscores? If you look on sites like Miniclip or Addictinggames, every game has a highscores feature or something similar. Yes, you play games for fun. But no matter how much you play it for "fun", at some point it will get competitive. I can't think of a single example where a game started out just for fun, and stayed just for fun for its entire lifetime, that also wasn't a complete failure or otherwise totally unknown. I doubt when James Naismith invented a new game for his Physical Education students to play during the winter, he intended to create an internationally recognized Olympic sport that draws millions of viewers and thousands of competitors of all age levels. Yet today we have basketball that's just that, if not even greater. It's the simple fact that some people play games (sports included as a form of game) competitively because they enjoy playing it competitively. True, some may be in it because they simply think the game is fun, and yeah I'm not going to deny that there are those people who play just because they want to reap the rewards. But if you mean to tell me that every member of a varsity sports team is playing for the wrong reason, I'm going to have to flat out disagree. [hide=Aside] I know I'm drawing a comparison between games and sports, which may not be entirely a good comparison to make. However they are both essentially the same thing. Both are designed for "fun" on a very basic scale, but can be taken to very competitive levels. Thus, for the sake of this argument, they fall under the same category, and to say otherwise, although plausible, would forfeit the purpose of this argument. [/hide]

All of them, you get to select which of the 3 you want each time one is "dropped".

sounds better than what i would do

wow thats more than ltk makes in like a month! teach me how to dks one day tbh

got dlegs from steels today@@@@@ dont let ltk take it, it might double his bank or something

bellhop

how do you have a viceroy without a king