Abstrakt

[WeeBoab]

[LeonardMart]

text is hard to read...

[WeeBoab]

given my name and the name of the topic i didnt think it would take much imagination to figure out what it said

 

 

 

it says

 

 

 

weeboab

 

abstract

[LeonardMart]

i know what it says, but still make it more readable

[runemetsa]

I don't think the text matters in a sig.

 

 

 

But this is a very nice signature. Flow is nice and lighting is good. Could use a bit of sharpening but it good this way too.

[WeeBoab]

its been sharpened

[No_OnE]

I don't think the text matters in a sig.

 

 

 

But this is a very nice signature. Flow is nice and lighting is good. Could use a bit of sharpening but it good this way too.

 

Nah, the fact that some parts are blurry and some are sharp gives it depth. Almost as if it's an actual picture and certain parts were closer to the camera making them out of focus. If all parts were sharp then the sig would be too flat. Anyway, I take it this is the Luigi sig without Luigi? Very nice.

[WeeBoab]

ty :P

 

 

 

and i used to make my text nearly invisible, because it was just an anti-rip measure to be, but i started to realise how it can really make or break a sig :XD:

[venomai]

I don't think the text matters in a sig.

 

I disagree. Typography is an important part of any graphic design.

 

 

 

(Hope you don't mind some c/c)

 

 

 

The text is horrible in this sig. Small, very difficult to read, completely covered by the background shapes. It shows almost no effort put into the typography -- you would be better off leaving text-less out if that was the case.

 

 

 

The background is cool, but the blur is overdone. We see too much of it, and it seems to overpower the sharp shapes. The sparks add a nice touch, but the green dots in front clash with the blues imo.

 

 

 

Needs a border on the sides.

 

 

 

Overall, nice looking eye candy, but not enough attention to colour and composition.

[WeeBoab]

I don't think the text matters in a sig.

 

I disagree. Typography is an important part of any graphic design.

 

 

 

(Hope you don't mind some c/c)

 

 

 

The text is horrible in this sig. Small, very difficult to read, completely covered by the background shapes. It shows almost no effort put into the typography -- you would be better off leaving text-less out if that was the case.

 

 

 

The background is cool, but the blur is overdone. We see too much of it, and it seems to overpower the sharp shapes. The sparks add a nice touch, but the green dots in front clash with the blues imo.

 

 

 

Needs a border on the sides.

 

 

 

ps: 'not enough attention to colour and composistion' i spent a lot of time on both - theyre deliberately the way they are.

 

 

 

Overall, nice looking eye candy, but not enough attention to colour and composition.

 

 

 

the text is deliberately placed tht way. its hidden partially. i dont want the text to be the focal point do i?

 

 

 

the blurred bit at the front is heavilly blurred to give a sense of depth - not to take away from the focal point (the sharp bit with the green sparks) but to enhance it.

 

 

 

its cyan (turqoise (blue/green) i played around with a few colours for the sparks and tht looked the best.

 

 

 

thx for ur comments :