I'm just wondering what the whole "Holier than thou" attitude is for. You don't like the game.. so what?! Just because one likes a simple game that doesn't have a gravity gun means they're dumbed down versions of "real" fps players that play HL:2 or the same tired ol' CS? Get the [bleep] off your high horse, Gordon. Noone cares.

 

 

 

What did I say to make you think that? I didn't say that I was better than you, I had no intention of even implying that. Also, I didn't mention anything about the gravity gun (although, imo, the super gravity gun is cooler than any weapon in any other fps) or HL:2, or Counter-Strike in this topic. I may have mentioned it somewhere else, but that was outside of this topic, and I didn't use that as an argument anywhere in this topic. If you want me to, I could, and I could explain how much better CS is than online multiplayer Halo2, but I won't unless you truly want to have an argument about that. I mean, one of the main reasons I was trying not to compare the two was that they're on two different systems, and can hardly be compared. And to the guy taht commented on how other sequels were successful because of their originals, well, you're just being ignorant and not seeing my meaning behind that. Of course more people will buy the sequels because they liked the first game, that's obvious. What I meant was that, if those games that you mentioned had been stand-alone games and not sequels, they would've done very well. May not be able to say that about Halo 2.

 

And no_one, I played Halo 2. I got it, played it online for about a month. I got pretty good at it. It got boring. Yes, I went back to CS. I may not have had 1337 skillz in Halo 2, but the main reason I got bored of Halo 2 was because of having to play it with a controller. Keyboard and mouse ftw. I'll leave RPGs and adventures for consoles.

 

Ahh, now I see the root of our disagreement. I prefer keyboard and mouse for RPGs and adventures other than LoZ but I prefer controller for shooters. I'd also like to apologize for being an idiot in the past. I've been in an easily agitated mood for the past few days because of a biology project in school. Though that's no excuse.

I'm just wondering what the whole "Holier than thou" attitude is for. You don't like the game.. so what?! Just because one likes a simple game that doesn't have a gravity gun means they're dumbed down versions of "real" fps players that play HL:2 or the same tired ol' CS? Get the [bleep] off your high horse, Gordon. Noone cares.

 

 

 

What did I say to make you think that? I didn't say that I was better than you, I had no intention of even implying that. Also, I didn't mention anything about the gravity gun (although, imo, the super gravity gun is cooler than any weapon in any other fps) or HL:2, or Counter-Strike in this topic. I may have mentioned it somewhere else, but that was outside of this topic, and I didn't use that as an argument anywhere in this topic. If you want me to, I could, and I could explain how much better CS is than online multiplayer Halo2, but I won't unless you truly want to have an argument about that. I mean, one of the main reasons I was trying not to compare the two was that they're on two different systems, and can hardly be compared. And to the guy taht commented on how other sequels were successful because of their originals, well, you're just being ignorant and not seeing my meaning behind that. Of course more people will buy the sequels because they liked the first game, that's obvious. What I meant was that, if those games that you mentioned had been stand-alone games and not sequels, they would've done very well. May not be able to say that about Halo 2.

 

And no_one, I played Halo 2. I got it, played it online for about a month. I got pretty good at it. It got boring. Yes, I went back to CS. I may not have had 1337 skillz in Halo 2, but the main reason I got bored of Halo 2 was because of having to play it with a controller. Keyboard and mouse ftw. I'll leave RPGs and adventures for consoles.

 

Ahh, now I see the root of our disagreement. I prefer keyboard and mouse for RPGs and adventures other than LoZ but I prefer controller for shooters. I'd also like to apologize for being an idiot in the past. I've been in an easily agitated mood for the past few days because of a biology project in school. Though that's no excuse.

 

 

 

I honestly can't tell if you're being sarcastic or not.

I'm just wondering what the whole "Holier than thou" attitude is for. You don't like the game.. so what?! Just because one likes a simple game that doesn't have a gravity gun means they're dumbed down versions of "real" fps players that play HL:2 or the same tired ol' CS? Get the [bleep] off your high horse, Gordon. Noone cares.

 

 

 

What did I say to make you think that? I didn't say that I was better than you, I had no intention of even implying that. Also, I didn't mention anything about the gravity gun (although, imo, the super gravity gun is cooler than any weapon in any other fps) or HL:2, or Counter-Strike in this topic. I may have mentioned it somewhere else, but that was outside of this topic, and I didn't use that as an argument anywhere in this topic. If you want me to, I could, and I could explain how much better CS is than online multiplayer Halo2, but I won't unless you truly want to have an argument about that. I mean, one of the main reasons I was trying not to compare the two was that they're on two different systems, and can hardly be compared. And to the guy taht commented on how other sequels were successful because of their originals, well, you're just being ignorant and not seeing my meaning behind that. Of course more people will buy the sequels because they liked the first game, that's obvious. What I meant was that, if those games that you mentioned had been stand-alone games and not sequels, they would've done very well. May not be able to say that about Halo 2.

 

And no_one, I played Halo 2. I got it, played it online for about a month. I got pretty good at it. It got boring. Yes, I went back to CS. I may not have had 1337 skillz in Halo 2, but the main reason I got bored of Halo 2 was because of having to play it with a controller. Keyboard and mouse ftw. I'll leave RPGs and adventures for consoles.

 

Ahh, now I see the root of our disagreement. I prefer keyboard and mouse for RPGs and adventures other than LoZ but I prefer controller for shooters. I'd also like to apologize for being an idiot in the past. I've been in an easily agitated mood for the past few days because of a biology project in school. Though that's no excuse.

 

 

 

I honestly can't tell if you're being sarcastic or not.

 

Everything I said was serious. I really do hate console RPGs and I don't think shooters are as good on computers with the exception of a few. Also, the apology was sincere. I just gave the my final biology oral presentation yesterday and I'm a whole lot less stressed and less easily agitated. I was just being a jerk before.